Thomas Hobbes, John Locke And Jean-Jaques Rousseau

Superior Essays
Theories regarding the source and acquisition of knowledge, the needs of human life, necessity of freedom, inequality, the general will and the collective good outlined the beginning of civil society. It was from here that an understanding of the political society was built. Good government, sovereignty, and legitimate authority are the definitions upon which the modern state is built. Fundamental to our contemporary understanding of the modern government is the work of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jaques Rousseau. The liberals who theories laid the groundwork for the basic structure and principles of the modern political order. Each begin with varied accounts of the state of nature and then furthered their perspective by expanding …show more content…
His notion of the right to “Life, Health, Liberty, or Possessions” (Locke, 271) is found in every progressive constitution. The state of nature was defined by Locke as “Men living together according to reason, without a common superior on Earth” (280). Locke ascertains we naturally belong to “a state of perfect freedom/a state also of equality” (269). This condition is governed by reason, the law of nature that commands everyone (Locke, 271). It is by this law that Locke articulates “all men may be restrained from invading others rights, and from doing hurt to one another” (Locke, 271). His conception of natural rights is the foundation upon which modern government is built. As seen in the constitution of a state, the basis for all legislation is to protect and uphold these rights. The concept of rights, as outlined by Locke require the government to act in certain ways. Natural rights manifest themselves through legal norms which are constituted as legal rights by the modern state. As “all men are naturally in that state [of nature], and remain so, till by their own consents they make themselves members of some politick society” legitimizing those

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rebellion Dbq

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unlike John Locke’s idea that these rights of life, liberty, and property were God given, these rights were King given, and therefore could be taken away by a future king or queen. Later in 1689, Parliament passed the English Bill of Rights entailing the enumerated rights of all citizens of England, and guaranteed clearly the rights to life, liberty, and…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    French Revolution Dbq

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Locke’s book “Second Treatise of Government” he states that “Being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possession” (Locke Sec.6). With these rights that were stated in his book. They ended up becoming the foundation for the primary document during the French Revolution. Some of the French monarchy didn’t agree because this document was used to state that the role of the Government was to protect the natural rights of the citizens. Many might not know but with the ideas of these natural rights were the foundation that helped create The Declaration of…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In it, Locke stated that by natural law, all men are entitled to life, liberty, and the right to own property. One definition of…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cyrus The Great Dbq

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Locke played off of Hobbes idea that the sovereign must justify its exercise of power. In contrast however, Locke went much further into identifying human rights. Locke writes that: The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise maker. (Locke 107) Locke believed that in a state of nature all men are inherently equal.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dorinda Outram’s book The Enlightenment contains the chapter “Enlightenment and Government” which highlights that contrary to popular belief, not all philosophes had the same ideas when it came to the ideal government. Outram focuses on the misconceptions people had about the Enlightenment and bring to light the true differences people had about government during this time period. Outram discusses the relationship between the Enlightenment and government, a relationship that has had few research. Through the lives of three leaders in Enlightenment and government John Lock, Baron de Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, it is clear how philosophes greatly differed yet had many similarities in the way they viewed government. John Locke’s view of government is based on the idea that all men are in a state of nature by God; Locke refers to this state as perfect freedom in Second Treatise on Government.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Beginning in the 1600s, European philosophers began thinking about how a nation should be governed. Many of these philosophers began moving towards a democracy, rather than the absolute monarchy they were under. Two of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers were John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Although John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau lived at different times during the Enlightenment period, Locke from 1632 to 1704 and Rousseau from 1712 to 1778, their thoughts on society and its political form are comparable. Both Locke and Rousseau believed that the people should form a government, however, their ideas of government differed.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Declaration of Independence guaranteed the rights of the colonists that had been violated by the British government. One of the main ideas of the Declaration stated that, “The rights of the people are based on a higher law than laws made by humans… They are given by ‘the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God’ and are ‘unalienable.’” The use of Locke’s theory regarding natural rights delineates the manner in which the oppression the colonists faced led to a larger comprehension of the rights expressed by the theories of the Enlightenment. Thus, the Founders utilized the developments of the Enlightenment to shape the American government.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These ideas were formed on the premise that government’s duty is to safeguard people’s natural rights such as liberty, life, and property. Therefore, these rights could not be taken away as there were ‘unalienable’. However, when the government failed to perform its duties, Locke argued that they should set up a new one. These Enlightenment ideas about natural rights became the reason for the Declaration of Independence. Additionally, the idea of popular sovereignty (political power) was based on the disposition that government’s power comes from people.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction ‘During and after the English Revolution (1642-88), different English thinkers reacted differently toward the revolution, based on their own life experience and philosophical outlook’. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke strongly argued distinct notions of political power. One absolute kinship, the other a democratic republic. In this essay it will firstly state and discuss the relation between state and sovereign according to Thomas Hobbes. In doing so Thomas Hobbes ideas will then be compared to John Locke’s.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, under the law of nature (which suggests that all men are both free and equal) everyone has a right to the natural resources that the earth produces and no man’s right exceeds another. However, how can common available resources become private property thus excluding the right of other men? Locke begins his argument by identifying the property each man has in his own person in which no other man can claim (Locke, 8). One's body, actions, thoughts, and beliefs is the basis on which Locke explains how an individual obtains the right to possess objects outside of himself. Locke argues, “Though men as a whole own the earth and all inferior creatures, every individual man has a property in his own person; this is something that nobody else has any right to.”…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dunn (2003) considers the most important rights Locke believes we obtain in the state of nature, for example, the right to hold to account the person who infringes or breaks this natural law, and punishing them appropriately for this. Locke claims that in this state of nature all persons are free, equal, and independent (II. 4-6 cited in Lloyd Thomas, 1995). They are not necessarily free due to the fact that they cannot disregard natural law. Within the state of nature people are confined to do only what the law of nature permits of them (Lloyd Thomas,…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since it’s important to protect the people and their needs, they should choose the necessary to protect their rights to life. Locke explains the importance of the economy in relationship to man its activities in daily life. According to him, men are laborers who then gain property that should be looked after and it should not be misused. People earn money via land trading but according to Locke people should understand that they should not waste any commodity, hence if it is misused the punishments come into play. Unlike Hobbes and his viewpoint at looking at one’s violence, Locke explains the laws under which these circumstances can be looked over rather than hoping for the government to take action.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people specifically philosophers would question, “Why we need a state?” or “What kind of state should we have?” This question opened up all the different views and perspective of the three following philosophers, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. They all have different but also very similar views on the state of nature, social contract, laws. Hobbes definition of state of nature is a state of war. Morality doesn’t exists and everyone lives in constant fear.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some might argue that John Locke and his philosophy are insignificant. They might believe that life, liberty and property are not mandatory rights that the government should have the power to protect. It is possible for them to not be educated enough on the topic to fully understand it’s impertinence. I argue that our natural rights are the most necessary rights to defend. They are the foundation of our country, government, and society.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays