History Of The Warren Court Era

Improved Essays
Throughout history, there has been countless ways in which a judge has conducted themselves within a courtroom. Throughout this interval of recreation, there has been only a handful that have ultimately transformed the world we live in today. One of those is known as the Warren Court Era of 1953-1969. Within the courtroom, the Warren Court era has represented a time of trial, struggle, and change, crossing the lines that were once put in front of us to follow. This was a time when judicial philosophy re-defined the way in which we viewed the judicial system as well as a copious outbreak of judicial activism. There were a series of judicial decisions that exceedingly alter many aspects of this era, including; an individual’s civil rights, the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Storm Center Summary

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Like Amar, O’Brien goes into extensive details in his writings to better explain his point of view. Throughout chapter six of storm center, O’Brien gives multiple examples and details on how the supreme court and American way of life impact one another. After reading this chapter I feel more educated on the impact of the American life and supreme court and gained knowledge on information I did not know before. Three main points that caught my attention throughout this chapter were: the impact of public opinion on the supreme court, media coverage and the supreme court, and the implementation of unpopular supreme court decisions.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secret Life Of Bees Essay

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Laws have been an essential component to the peace and stability in society. The United States have been involved in some of the world's most significant treaties and agreements, but for the welfare of the country, the Civil Rights Act is arguably the most influential. It was signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, but many political and historical figures including John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., and Rosa Parks aided in this monumental movement. Undeniably, it was for the greater good and has changed history, but “The Secret Life of Bees” proves that there are always downsides to something seemingly beneficial. The laws were extremely controversial, especially in the Southern side of the country, so there were bound to be consequences.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a 1962 book entitled The Least Dangerous Branch American legal scholar Alexander Bickel coined the term “counter-majoritarian difficulty” to refer to the inherent issues between judicial review and democracy (16). When a judiciary strikes down a piece of legislation and declares it unconstitutional it is going against the will of democratically elected representatives (Bickel, 1962, 16-17). Although Bickel was not the first scholar to point out the issues in reconciling judicial review and democracy, his critique inspired a new wave of academics to engage with judicial review (Friedman, 2002, 202). The critique became especially pronounced during the activist Warren Court of the 1960s (Friedman, 2002, 202). The counter-majoritarian difficulty…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Media Court Case Study

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Media court cases are very interesting and often have lasting effects even years after the case is made. There are numerous cases dealing with media that have had substantial effects. One of those cases Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster has shaped the way media is today and made some huge changes in how media is viewed. Grokster, and similar programs, enabled users to share files and content through the internet from computer to computer for free (MGM Studios v. Grokster). The software was quicker, more protected, and cheaper than servers (Casebriefs.com).…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Attempting to comprehend the High Court’s most contentious and complicated figure, Clarence Thomas, is not a feat many would be able to undertake, yet such is the exact endeavour both Supreme Discomfort by Kevin Merida and Michael A. Fletcher and Dean Martha Minow of Harvard Law School wished to engage in. Be that as it may, the conceptualization of a man whose image is riddled with contradictory politics, sexual harassment allegations, and a bitter-sweet public response, was different across two different portraits, geared towards two different audiences, constructed by two different types of individuals. Although the perception of Thomas as an individual was different on many personal and emotional degrees between both academic works, the…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Warren Court Case Study

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Polarized Court Prior jurisprudence says a lot about the Supreme Court today. The Warren Court—one of the most memorable Court’s in our nations history—hit many hot button issues of its time. An interesting juxtaposition is looking at the Roberts Court, who has had equally hot button issues of more recent times, and its approach. When I reflect on the Warren Court I am mesmerized by its legacy and impact on a more equal society, specifically, Brown v. Board of Education.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Major Warren Planner Case

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After stepping into Major Warren’s position, there are several considerations that could be made and certain activities that could be done differently from his initial implemented plans. When preparing for such an extraordinary meeting, it is important when the planners consider other factors apart from the intelligence reports that are available. As a planner of such an event of this magnitude, the first thing to do is to assess the past events that have taken place in the country of such weight. These events would offer each individual with a great opportunity to understand what the event will require, and specific measures that should be to be taken for the event to be as a success. Such an assessment may also involve assessing the nature…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Court ruled unanimously that President Richard Nixon had to surrender the tapes. Chief Justice Warren Burger delivered the opinion of the Court. Burger wrote, “The impediment that an absolute, unqualified [executive] privilege would place in the way of the primary constitutional duty of the Judicial Branch to do justice in criminal prosecutions would plainly conflict with the function of the courts under Art[icle] III.” Burger then turned his attention to the damage that a privilege of confidentiality would cause to citizens' constitutional rights: “The right to the production of all evidence at a criminal trial similarly has constitutional dimensions. The Sixth Amendment explicitly confers upon every defendant in a criminal trial the…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Techniques for judicial selection vary across the United States. Each state has a set of guidelines and rules overseeing how they fill their state and neighborhood judiciaries. During the judicial selections there are several debates, decisions and questions that have to be made and answered. “There are three methods that are used in selecting judges in the United States: 1) appointment by the executive or legislative branch of government, 2) elections which are partisan or non-partisan, and 3) a merit selection” (D.Neubauer & S. Meinhold). At least one of these methods is used in each state to select a trail judge and another for an appellate court judge.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Non-Majority

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the creation non-unanimous established prior to the civil rights movement, it withstood the times and revolution in the state, exploited to accuse and convict whomever the court desired to, exclusive of the difficulty of being acquitted by jury members who opposed the majority’s verdict. One particular illustration happened in 1970, Frank Johnson, an African American, was incriminated “with the crime of armed robbery. He was tried by a jury of twelve, convicted (the verdict was nine to three), and sentenced to serve thirty-five years at hard labor in the Louisiana State Penitentiary,” (72). While imprisoned, Mr. Johnson attempted to appeal for his case by asserting that his arrest was unlawful in the first place in that “the arrest…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Warren Court Era Analysis

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This class has been a very fun and enjoyable experience in learning about the very important Warren Court Era. The Warren Court has led the way for variety of changes in the United States of America through landmark decisions like Brown v. Board of Education and Miranda v. Arizona. A very interesting thing that I learned was that Earl Warren was appointed by Dwight D. Eisenhower with the intent that Warren would be a very conservative judge, but as cases were presented to the Supreme Court the American people soon learned that Warren was a very liberal and revolutionary Supreme Court justice. Warren must have been a very convincing justice to have many case decisions go his way. This course was very good in showing how the atmosphere at the time was many a times in…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The current U.S. campaign finance system is definitely a problem. The U.S. campaign financing system has never been one of the hallmarks of our democracy as influence has always been susceptible to monetary benevolence. But in 2010 it was dealt a lethal blow by the U.S. Supreme Court when they decided by a narrow majority to trample a century of precedent and declare that corporations, and by extension labor unions, have a first amendment right to spend unlimited amounts of money to influence the outcome of elections. There are few Supreme Court decisions that have received as much public debate, backlash and attention (except by most of the students in our class who had never heard of it -- scary). “Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg called it…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This constraint suggests that courts effective produce social change because they lack independence to do so. After the Brown decision, there was not much seen in terms of judicial independence. There was much scrutiny that the courts were unable to produce social change because not much change was seen after the decision. However, the Dynamic Court view argues that courts can produce social change and Brown did ultimately influence the other branches of the government to intervene to support the decision. Eventually, in the 1960s, the congressional and executive branch began to expand their agendas to focus on the civil rights movement.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federal courts have recently made headlines when they blocked several of Donald Trump’s executive orders sparking rigorous debate as to what the role of the Judicial Branch is. Much of this debate is centered around whether the judges blocking the orders is judicial activism. The argument for or against judicial activism is always heated around important supreme court cases, but in the end no consensus is reached. In order to take an alternate approach to the argument against judicial activism, I will examine the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Supreme Court case which is the center of much of the judicial activism debate, and show the adverse effects that judicial activism can potentially cause. By establishing that…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Legitimacy

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “The judicial system of the United States promotes the equal right of participation by allowing a single individual who has been harmed by a law to challenge its constitutionality. People who have financial resources or who can find support from organized interests may fare better than those who have to act on their own” (Geer et al, 2016, 532). In the last decades, the Supreme Court has lost its capability to base its legitimacy only in its legal experience, nevertheless it has won public support as a new source of legitimate authority. Because of the increased in public understanding that legal experience does not award the Court with specific answers, the Court has lost some experience as a source of legitimacy. As a result of scientific surveys/polls of public opinion and its current centrality in the public mind, the Court has open a new source of…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays