Determinate Sentencing

Improved Essays
Before committing a crime, would you think about how much time you would spend incarcerated for it? During colonial times, criminal sentencing in America was introduced initially on retribution and then later on in prevention. By the late 1800s, sentencing in America had become dominated by rehabilitation. The goal of criminal punishment was to transform the offender by changing their ability to commit crime again. In order to accomplish this, sentencing needed to be uniquely flexible per individual. This led to “intermediate sentencing,” named because the exact term of punishment was uncertain. By this meaning an offender could be sentenced to 6 months, however that offender could spend 6 months or more, the sentence time was uncertain. …show more content…
Determinate sentencing was a definite sentencing that was not subject to review by a parole board or other agency. A sentence of 9 months in the county jail is determinate. The offender will not spend more than 9 months in a facility, in some cases offered parole after some time served. Different jurisdictions have adopted different sentencing terms, some in the case of overlap prisoners. For example, Detroit Michigan is one of the highest ranked cities for crimes. Their process of individuals would be much more faster than Wichita Kansas. This might mean that 2 offenders who commit the same crime, in Detroit and in Wichita may be released sooner in Detroit to avoid over capacity in their facilities. Now along with this example, determinate sentencing has set standards. Offenders sentenced to long terms in jail or prisons are offered “good time” credits. But this discount for good behavior is capped at 15%, so offenders must serve at least 85% of their sentence. With this “good time” reducement available, some facilities believe that drives inmates to serve safe and impacting time. With the hope of sentence reducement inmates riot less and become more adaptive to their restricted surroundings. Given those who do not spend safe time and are repeat offenders there are standards to their sentencing as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Commerce law assessment task 3- Lachlan O’Malley Mandatory Sentencing in New South Wales 1. Mandatory Sentencing- a mandatory sentence is a court decision where legal discretion is limited by law. Most frequently, people convicted of certain crimes such as armed robbery or murder must be punished with at least a minimum number of years set in prison. 2.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to federal and state courts their sentencing methods are different in away because federal courts deal with all federal crimes and the sentencing as well as the trial takes place in a federal court close to where the actual crime happen. Now in a federal court the judge uses a manual known as “The Federal Sentencing Guidelines” (avvo.com. n.d.). This helps them to calculate the penalties for a serious offense sentence. Unfortunately, this sentencing guideline cannot be used mandatorily; it is still used in helping make penalty considerations. Now in a state court penalties and sentencing are often guided by the state legislation.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ms. Hoss strong point of view. Intermediate sanctions can change an individual way of thinking. By enforcing the shock incarceration program, it allows offenders to be productive in the community by developing into law-abiding citizens without being a threat. This therapeutic sanction gives nonviolent offenders the opportunity to receive help, substance abuse treatment, and academic education to promote their reintegration back into the community. The shock incarceration regimen is a 90-day program designed as an alternative to traditional incarceration.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sentencing Proposal

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Aaron I think it's cool you picked Idaho. To be honest I here about Idaho constantly living in Montana I'm glad you gave some incite in on the sentencing guidelines for the state of Idaho. I also read the Idaho I was thinking of doing my post on Idaho as well, and I read according to U.S. Probation & pretrial District of Idaho (2014), "The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 radically changed the philosophical model for sentencing offenders in the Federal Courts" (p. 1). After this occurred congress adopted a determinate based off of national guidelines. Which lead to the supreme court in 2005 ruling in the"United States v. Booker, 125 S.Ct.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the process of sentencing an offender, we follow a set of rules known as the due process which considers the severity of a sentence, what charges have been laid, court hearings, and whether or not an arrest should take place. Such primitive procedure is used to prove the fact that a person is innocent until proven guilty.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Smarter Sentencing

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I am writing this letter requesting you vote in favor of the Smarter Sentencing Act. Sentences regarding possession and trafficking of controlled substances are due for much needed review. Taxpayers spend several thousand dollars to hold a single inmate in prison for a year, and there are thousands of individuals currently incarcerated for such offenses. By essentially halving the minimum sentence of these crimes the billions of taxpayer dollars saved can be applied elsewhere.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Australian Sentencing

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hypothesis: although indefinite sentencing appears to ignore the rights of the individual in favour of the protection of the community; as one item of choice in a raft of sentencing options, it has improved the capacity of the criminal justice system to protect individual rights and keep peace and order in society. The Criminal Justice system is a system of laws and rulings aiming to protect community members and their property. It determines which events causing injury or offence to community members are criminal offences. Criminal offenders may be punished through the law by fines, imprisonment or community service.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent discussions of the jail system, a controversial issue has been whether incarceration has helped contribute to the efforts of decreasing crime On the one hand, some argue that mass incarceration is a horrible failure. On the other hand, however, others argue that incarceration brings crime down. In sum, then, the issue is whether mass incarceration is the solution to lowering the crime rate or not. Though many people assume that mass incarceration drops the crime rate, it still does not change how the same criminals that are incarcerated are being released from jail committing the same crimes over and over making it almost impossible to drop the crime rate.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sentencing Disparity

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sentencing Disparity among Men and Women Does sentencing disparity exist among men in women who are being sentence for violent, property, and drug offenses? Is sentencing disparity based on race or what ethnic group you belong to? Does judicial bias really take place in the sentencing process? If you are convicted of a crime, the best thing you can having going for you is your gender. Fair sentencing is individualized sentencing.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By keeping these offenders imprisoned and from continuing their illegal activities, it is seen as keeping the public safe from any further harm. Before mandated minimums, it was possible to receive a fair sentence from a judge who could assess the situation and decide based on their experience. With minimums, one can argue that it reduces sentencing disparity (Caulkins, J., Rydell, C., Schwabe, W., & Chiesa, J., 1997). Now offenders committing similar crimes will all receive the same sentence, no matter the circumstance. When an offender is faced with a lengthy sentence for a crime committed, it provides a tool for prosecutors to use to find others involved.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life Without Parole

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mandatory Life Without Parole Juveniles, or someone under the age of 18, shouldn’t be given a sentence of mandatory life without parole but, they should be given quite a bit of time in prison. Although some may consider it cruel and unusual punishments because of the wording of the 8th Amendment, some juveniles are just natural born killers and deserve to be in prison for the rest of their life. A juvenile committing murder of the 1st degree, breaking the law knowing that what they were doing was wrong should be given large amount of time in prison but not life without parole. I believe by giving this person a large sentence of let’s say 10 to 20 years in prison, would help the families of…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the semester, we have repeatedly discussed statistics regarding current crime and incarceration rates. In comparison to previous rates, from earlier decades, it is clear that society’s viewpoint on crime has changed significantly. Beginning in the early 1970s, the United States initiated a more punitive criminal justice system (1). In The Punishment Imperative, authors Todd R. Clear and Natasha A. Frost created a concept for the reasoning behind this mass incarceration. Referred to as the “Punishment Imperative,” its basis for reasoning focused on the symbolic image that crime held in society; meaning, as crime rates grew, the societal fear for basic safety began to emerge.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Sentencing Essay

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The criminal justice system maintains different goals when attempting to correct deviant and illicit behavior. In accordance to the sentencing guidelines established by United States Sentencing Commission (2011), punitive sentences are to incorporate a purpose for the sentence. Criminal sentencing can be categorized into six areas with distinctive goals: general and specific deterrence, incapacitation, retributive, rehabilitative, and equity/restitution. The sentencing goals are not exclusive and at times overlap in achieving its purpose. Furthermore, one goal is not better than another, but rather one would be more applicable in certain situations than another.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last 40 years, incarceration in the United States has reached epidemic proportions. We have the highest incarceration rate in the world; we hold 5% of the world’s population, but house 25% of the world’s prisoners (Kelly 2015). The use of incarceration has gradually become a more acceptable and more used form of punishment. As a result, our prison population is overflowing with offenders ranging from petty theft criminals to violent offenders. As cited in the textbook, purposes of our justice system should be retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation, (Clear, Reisig, & Cole 2016, p.72-73) but we focus far too much on punishment first and rehabilitation second, if ever.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nonetheless, the program is not for every offender trying to work their way back into society. Hence, the program’s overall purpose is to “reduce the number of offenders serving state prison sentences by permitting them to be resentenced to an intermediate form of punishment.” With this approach, more prison rooms are opened for criminals who have committed rather heinous crimes while less serious offenders are placed on intensive…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays