Hiroshima Bombing Justified

Improved Essays
The debate of whether or not the atomic bombing on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is justified still goes on today. There are those that believe that President Truman made the right choice and those who believe that other options were ignored. The U.S. air force dropped the atomic bombs hoping to intimidate the Japanese which resulted in the surrender of Japan to the Allies on September 2, 1945. Although Japan attacked Pearl Harbor first on December 7, 1941, the casualties were far less than the fatalities in Japan. The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is not justified because there could have been another way to end the war than killing millions of Japanese civilians.
The decision to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki is justified to the US during
…show more content…
The Japanese did not have enough time to surrender since the second bomb on Nagasaki happened only three days after the bombing in Hiroshima. These bombings targeted civilians who are innocent and not involved in the war. Tsutomu Yamaguchi, a survivor, was in both cities when the bombs dropped (The Washington Post). He was in Hiroshima on a business trip and suffered severe burns to his upper body after the bombing (ibid). Yamaguchi returned to Nagasaki, his hometown, and the second bombing occurred a few days later (ibid). He died at age 93 on the fourth of January due to stomach cancer(ibid). Yoshitaka, a thirteen year old student, was in class when he saw a pale flash and collapsed (Stevenson). When he regained conscious, his classmates that were stuck under the debris grabbed his ankles asking for help as he tried to escape the building (ibid). Not knowing about the radiation, he went to the river near the school to get drinking water (ibid). People at the time did not know that radiation poisoning from the bombs made the cities unsafe to live in. Some survivors developed illnesses from radiation exposure, including cancer, liver problems, and genetic damage in future generations (Kimura, …show more content…
had time to reflect on whether or not the decision made to bomb Japan was justified. Americans during the time of the war thought it was necessary. Now, they believe there could have been another solution and that nuclear weapons should not be used indiscriminately again. President Barack Obama neither apologized nor justified the attack when he mourned the victims of the atomic bombing at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park but, instead, focused on a non-nuclear future (Lee, Carol E., and Alexander Martin). The victims of Hiroshima said that it took courage for Obama to visit because there are still many people who are suffering (ibid). Shigeaki Mori, a survivor, said, “I suffered so much, so today was the best day that was given by America” (ibid). The United States wanted to prevent such a tragedy from happening again by limiting nuclear weapons and avoiding another nuclear war with the Prevention of Nuclear War

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Truman Hasty Decision Dbq

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From order of President Truman, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thus ending World War Two. President Truman’s hasty decision is not one to be honorable. This choice by the president was made with ignorance, lack of empathy, and lack of critical thinking. The bombing is unjustified due to Japan’s inevitable surrender, the amount of civilian casualties, and alternative opportunities to the bombing.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the aftermath of the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor the United States retaliated on August 6, 1945, at 8:15 a.m. the crew of the Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb over the city of Hiroshima. The bomb detonated 2,000 feet above the center of Hiroshima, destroying 60% of the city and killing an estimated 70,000 to 100,000 people immediately. Due to amount of civilian deaths this led to, we often ask ourselves if the bombings over these Japanese cities were necessary. To debate wether the bombing was necessary we should pay attention to Japans decision to continue to not surrender after the first bombing. If a country is that proud and resilient for them to still refuse to surrender after one nuclear bombing killing between 70,000 to 100,000…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945, in response to World War II and Japan’s vicious attacks on the U.S., the United States launched the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. 80,000 people died, and sixty percent of the city was destroyed. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, in which killed 70,000 people instantaneously and many more in the following weeks. These atomic bombs resulted in pure destruction and chaos for Japan and its people. Although the atomic bombs destroyed part of Japan and took many lives with them, the dropping of the atomic bombs were justified because the U.S. aimed for the complete and utter destruction of Japan and Japan remained a major threat that needed to be eliminated.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the Dropping the atomic bomb was the only correct decision for the United States because of casualties being less than what they would have if America had invaded, the brutality of Japanese towards the American POW, and the importance of intimidating Stalin. By dropping the Atomic bomb, the United States rightfully saved thousands of potential lives. After the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the amount of Japanese lives lost totaled to 105,000. (Doc E)…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In early December in 1941, Pearl Harbor had been attacked by the Japanese, resulting in the deaths of over 2,400 American soldiers. This infuriated the U.S and caused them to officially join the war. Four years later, on August 6, 1945, a US B-29 bomber had dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima instantly killing about 70,000 people. Three days later, a second bomb had been dropped on Nagasaki which caused the deaths of 40,000 more people. The United States’ decision to drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a diplomatic measure calculated to intimidate the Soviet Union.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Apparently, the Japanese didn’t think the Hiroshima bomb was a clear enough message and still did not surrender-- this was a major mistake they made. America then, finally dropped the second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. 60,000 people died instantly. After the bombing on Nagasaki is when Japan finally got the hint to surrender.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Even today, many debate whether or not the US should have dropped the atomic bombs. Not only have the bombs killed many Japanese, the bombs also caused radiation sickness. However, these bombs were effective in that they ended one of the most costly wars the world has seen. Although the results of the atomic bombs were devastating to Japan, the US was justified in dropping the bombs because it swiftly ended the war, which effectively saved more lives than it costed.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1945 during the high of World War II, the United States dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. Many historians and government officials have argued that the atomic bombing was a War Crime or unjustifiable by any means. However, the world was at war thus, the United States were completely justifiable for dropping the atomic bomb of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. There are three main reasons why dropping the bombing on Hiroshima and Nagasaki justifiable first, it prevented a million American soldiers from losing their lives, and secondly, it causes Japan to quickly surrender, and lastly, it helped the Allies draw closer to the end of the war. Due to these reasons dropping the atomic bomb was worth it, beyond a reasonable…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Japan had fought for four years before the bombing of Hiroshima. They did not know that it would come to an atomic bomb. Another argument is that the atomic bomb saved millions of lives. President Truman defended his decision to deploy the bombs by saying that the bombs were dropped on a military base as a way to quickly end the war. This statement was false, because although soldiers were killed during the strike, a majority of the victims were civilians.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Decades after the atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Americans still question whether it was a good idea to drop them. One of the reasons the bombs should have been dropped is the bombing of Pearl Harbor. The United States and Japan were at peace until Japan bombed a military base in Hawaii and afterward, president Franklin D. Roosevelt declared war on Japan. In his well-known infamy speech, FDR stated, “I ask that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, December 7th, 1941, a state of war has existed between the United States and the Japanese empire.” America and its people saw the bombing as an act of war and in return, they declared war.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. Conclusion To conclude, it was reasonable for America to bomb the Japanese during World War two, as there are many logical explanations. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were unspeakable tragedies but despite many beliefs, the decision of the atomic bombs and the motives of the U.S leaders, have saved many of lives. The U.S was justified as the droppings of atomic bombs were a collaborative method of ending the war, and to hurry up the Japanese’s surrender.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this argument, though a popular one among critics of the bombings, is fictitious. According to Thomas Flagel, author of The History Buff’s Guide to World War II, “the cabinet of Prime Minister Suzuki Kantaro agreed to a cease-fire but not capitulation” (284). In other words, Japan would peacefully demilitarize, but would do so on its own terms. The Japanese generals and politicians who refused unconditional surrender would only settle for “‘honorable’” terms, like withholding parts of the Japanese empire that the Allies wanted (Hastings, Inferno 627). Furthermore, on July 26, 1945, several days before the bombing of Hiroshima, the western Allies forewarned the Japanese that, if they refused surrender, their country would be met with “‘prompt and utter destruction;’” however, the Japanese practically disregarded this declaration, thinking that the Allies were threatening more of the usual “firebombing and eventual invasion” (Hastings, Inferno 626-627).…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays