Theories Of Meat Consumption

Great Essays
1. Meat is so tasty because humans are closely related to meat eaters, humans have eaten meat since nearly the beginning of time, and meat can be viewed as a sign of success. Herzog argues that meat is so tasty because we “evolved from a long line of meat-eaters”. He argues that like chimpanzees, humans enjoy the way that meat tastes. Humans simply eat more meat than chimpanzees do. Another reason describing why meat is so tasty is because, in the words of BoBo, “that’s how our ancestors survived.” When Herzog interview BoBo (Robert) Lee, one of the owners of Po-Pigs, he stated that his theory is that “meat-eating is a part of the natural order of things.” I can agree with his theory; I feel as though eating meat has been a part of my life …show more content…
What determines is food is delectable or disgusting is culture and availability. In this chapter, Herzog explained that culture is influential on what we eat. He explains them with explaining the consumption of dog meat. In Asia, around 16 million dogs are consumed every year. In the United States, Americans prefer pork hams whereas in Asia “puppy ham” is the “preferred cut”. Asians consume vast amounts of dogs per year, and the numbers keep increasing. Americans do not eat dogs, at all. Mainly because dogs are viewed as family rather than food. My stomach churns at the idea of eating a dog when I have two dogs at my house Culture is very crucial in whether humans believe that a type of food is delectable or disgusting. Asians view dogs as delectable, while Americans view the consumption of dogs as disgusting and inhumane. The availability of meats has an impact of how meats are viewed. Herzog writes “lack of availability, however, is only one reason why people avoid eating certain types of meats.” If certain meats, such as “elephant toes” for example, are not available, a person would not have the ability to state if it is disgusting or delectable. The lack of availability limits the option of labeling a food delicious or …show more content…
There aren’t more vegetarians because humans enjoy eating meat and the increase of “eating birds”. Herzog writes that most vegetarians either return back to eating meat or crave eating meat, despite being a vegetarian. A study in the reading showed that “60 percent of ‘vegetarians’ admitted they had eaten red meat, poultry, or seafood within the last twenty-four hours.” Another study in the reading showed that, “‘vegetarians’ actually eat more chicken that non-vegetarian teens do.” There are simply not more vegetarians because Americans enjoy the way that meat taste, based on cultural reasons or biological reasons including that we are closely related with animals that enjoy the taste of meat. Chicken consumption increased from 1975 to 2009, by 200 percent and since then the chicken consumption has still been on the rise. Since studies have been composed, I think that poultry consumption has increased due to the increasing health “fads”. Since most people are obsessed with eating healthier, eating poultry is always a healthier option causing a lower number in vegetarians. People lie about their eating behaviors for social acceptance. In 2017, in particular, people want to be healthy and thin, or at least paint that picture. Lying about eating habits can make someone feel more socially accepted. The University of Pennsylvania researchers discovered that “meat-avoiders are more obsessed with their weight.” Herzog also writes that most college females choose to be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    My Year Of Meats Analysis

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    My Year of Meats has a particular way to display a genre in ways that other novels do not have with her unique way of presenting, Ruth Ozeki uses “meat” not just in the title but as a way that women (like Akiko) believe that they’re seen as which is cattle, I saw the metaphorical “equation” as body = meat and women = cattle. Ozeki also, most likely, did not put the clear use of cause and effect based on the fact that non-literal connections can be made about men towards women and cattle. Also, Ozeki had written this not only to read the fictional story of Akiko but to see a bigger picture of her culture and how people’s differences don't matter and to get past those differences of a person. The particular use of meat throughout the novel has…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Omnivore's Dilemma is a book which modified the way people looked at their food and also what they ate. In Chapter 8 “The Omnivore's Dilemma”, Michael Pollan explains that omnivores like the modern day American can eat just about anything, but the problem is that they are uncertain of what should be eaten. Americans obtain a variety of choices when in a supermarket, but do they recognize what is good for them? Michael Pollan also argues that the reason we experience so many diet fads is that Americans have no food culture to fall back on. So, according to Pollan, the omnivore's dilemma is that the modern-day American doesn't know what to eat because we have no food culture to fall back on.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Encumbered by highly advanced agricultural inventions, the American diet has evolved into a dilemma producing detrimental health affects for our nation. While a plethora of food choices, from chicken nuggets to Twinkies, may appear to be a dietary utopia; the technological advancements in the food industry have produced food-like products rather than authentic food. This nation-wide eating disorder has kept Americans in a cyclical process of attempting to achieve a thin figure while still gaining pounds. Through the course of his book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan investigates four meals: a meal from McDonalds eaten in the car, an organic based meal from Whole Foods, a meal from an organic, sustainable farm, and lastly, a meal that Pollan hunted and gathered himself.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Food has had many roles throughout our history; however, it seems to have outgrown its primary role in just providing us the nutrients we need to maintain us alive. It now has grown into a field of study in which we can explore the different tastes and cultural values apart from our own. This is a useful guidance in helping everyone outside of the culture understand and appreciate another culture's beliefs and ideals. Food can inform us a lot about a culture, whether they prefer food that's: spicy, sweet, or etc.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is no doubt that food is the paramount needs for human beings because food provides nutrients for human and without food human can’t survived in the world. In general, there are many different ways to get nutrients such as fruit, vegetable and animals meat but as we live in a developed science and technology society all you need is money, you can buy any food you want even though delivery food to you houses. As the matter of facts, food industries are mass produce food with chemicals that can make the food stay for a period of time and the price attracted for people to buy more and it turns out that meat is more cheaper than vegetables. However, in the essay of “ Against Meat” written by Jonathan Safran Foer, he described his experience of became a vegetarianism and the influence that he…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lot of people even start considering their dogs as their family members. Therefore, they get terrified when it comes to discussing dog eating. Other animals that people eat every day have the similar feelings and intelligence as dogs. Jonathan Safran Foer’s article explains why this represents such a sensitive subject to many people. On the other hand, he also provides a lot of reasonable arguments why eating dog “isn’t in any way bad for us.”…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While already a vegetarian, reading Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma allowed me to reexamine and thus reinforce my rationale for those choices: I have been a vegetarian since birth, so often times that choice is a passive one. There is a surplus of healthy options available for me without much active effort on my part, as a good portion of my family, immediate and extended, is vegetarian. In the modern age, the claim that humans need meat for optimal survival is unsubstantiated; in fact, a conscious vegetarian diet has been shown to have health benefits as well as environmental benefits.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Payton White Professor Hunsaker 3 September 2016 Articles 26 & 27 After analyzing article 26, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” by Alastair Norcross, a couple things become apparent. Such as (only use “such as” if you are continuing the sentence, but not to start a new sentence.) our author opening up his piece with a fictional scenario that seems a tad bit crazy, but serves as a very serious philosophical point. According to our ( it would be best to just say, “the” author instead of “our” author.) author, Norcross sees meat-eaters-at least those who know of the treatment of factory-farmed animals-are completely at fault for the consumption of meat.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Changing human diet can be a controversial topic and to change this omnivore’s mind one needs to present facts as cold as a fresh cut of meat. Marjorie Lee Garretson’s “More Pros Than Cons in a Meat-Free Life” is an essay that tries to persuade the reader to a vegan lifestyle under the guise of vegetarianism using few cited sources and trying to make the reader feel bad about the way they currently eat. “More Pros Than Cons in a Meat-Free Life” is a college level essay written by Marjorie Lee Garretson about the potential positives to vegetarian lifestyle. The essay first focuses on the health benefits of switching to vegetarianism which is done in three sentences claiming decreased cancer rates and longer life expectancy without any…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans are omnivores, which means that they eat both plants and animals. Ultimately, the human can decide whether or not they are going to consume animal meat. I am analyzing the article “Against Meat” in the They Say I say collection of articles. Jonathan Safran Foer talks about his experiences with his struggles of becoming a vegetarian.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement consists of privileged ideology based off emotion and no logic. Nathanael Johnson explores these ideals in “Is there a Moral Case for Meat?” and a couple in the film “At the Fork” explores the morality of farming. While the article and film seem to take similar stances on the farming of animals, I disagree. Humans do not have a responsibility to avoid meat or mitigate the suffering of farm raised animals.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In everyday life, dieting is the food a person consumes that can show what is and what is not healthy to eat. So, how does someone determine what is healthy or not because everyone in this world has a different body type. However, two authors have set out to write on such a topic. Michael Pollan, a nutritionist (Bullock 850), writes “Escape from the Western Diet” which is about Americans should completely cut out the Western diet because it consists of mostly processed food that is unhealthy for the body (Pollan 851). On the other hand, Mary Maxfield’s, a graduate student (Bullock 872), writes “Food as Thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating” which is about how people should not moralize food because it is their body and they should be…

    • 1294 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Animals are not ours to eat. Animals are not ours to wear. Animals are not ours to experiment on. Animals are not ours to use for entertainment. Animals are not ours to abuse in any way.”…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dog meat has been considered a traditional dish in Vietnam for a long time, and eating dog has been believed to be a way to preserve the national culture and to bring good luck as well (Arthurs, 2001). Currently, however, many animal lovers, animal rights activists and organizations all over the world have been concerned about whether this is an unsound and a barbarian custom that needs eliminating or not. For example, in the United States and Europe, people can treat dogs and cats as part of their family. Conversely, the value in Asia is vastly different, and dog meat or cat meat is regarded as a delicacy and some people loved it. It is undeniable that different cultures will leads to various conceptions, which makes this topic become a controversial…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lifestyle Superiority The debacle between omnivorous and vegetarian diets has been in effect for several years trying to determine which diet is superior to the other, and there are many factors that contribute to each. The omnivorous diet consists of consuming both meat and plant-based foods for a “well-balanced” diet. This diet allows for the consumer to gain necessary proteins and vitamins to help the body function and grow. It also helps in the process of muscle growth and health. A vegetarian diet is comprised of plant-based meals, cutting out any meats from ordinary diets.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays