The author provides quotations from citizens who were affected by the attacks, and information about how 9/11 affected people’s personal sense of security. The article also analyzes how official intelligence agencies had faulty security systems which allowed the terrorists to get away with what they had done. Gibbs’ article was useful for this research paper, mainly to help shape the argument about government security. The information in the article helped to prove the ineffectiveness of government security before 9/11, which allows the reader of the paper to see how much it has improved since then. The source has changed my personal opinion about how good government security is.…
The Government introduces you to a precedent that has to do with DLK’s case because in this case they intended for their info to be private, but the government used something that goes above the five senses so you would need a warrant to use it. This is important because in DLK’s case he intended for his info to be private, but since the government used a thermal imager without a warrant just like the bug in the Katz case, they found out he was growing marijuana in his home. No one else would want someone else to find out something that they are doing if it is private. While some may argue that the government can do that without a warrant if they are suspicious, no one would want their private info to be found or heard by the government. In conclusion, the Government should not invade your privacy unless given a warrant to do…
Following the attacks that occurred on 9/11, the United States government established the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was put into place to ensure the safety of the citizens of the United States by enhancing the security of the country. The act revised the nation’s surveillance laws, expanding the government’s authority to look into the records of citizens. This law also reduced the judicial oversight, public accountability and the ability to challenge government searches in court. These alterations and additions to the surveillance of the United States was said to ensure the safety of the people from ever having to experience any terrorist attack like the one that happened on 9/11.…
On September 11, 2001, one of the most horrific terrorist attacks in United States history took place. After the planes had collided with the Twin Towers, the masses of the United States of America suddenly was hit with anxiety and concern. America was prepared to lose their confidentiality in exchange for refuge from whatever dangers may follow in the future. When the Homeland Security Act, was passed in 2002 by President Bush, It showed how much the American people favored the constant surveillance by the government than the danger of being in harm's way. H.L. Mencken, an American essayist, and social critic wrote, “The average man does not want to be free.…
Since the government is invading our privacy it’s like having them watching our every move and constantly looking through our photo’s, Facebook messages, and text messages. For example when the FBI wanted Apple to unlock a terrorist phone so that they could look at the text messages. Apple informed the FBI that if they unlock that phone then they would be forced to unlock all of the phones. If they did this then hackers or the government could get a hold of something they don't need to know about. The government need to stop invading our privacy because if something gets leaked it could cost the government a lot of money or ruin someone’s life.…
My thoughts on this issue came from internet and my own beliefs. Because government shouldn’t have total control over your life. Also it’s not affecting anyone else if they’re doing it for their own good. Also the government shouldn 't say it shouldn 't be allowed because that could be government supporting christianity and their beliefs about suicides. I rank myself as a liberal on this topic, because most democrats think we should have the euthanasia procedure.…
There Is No Such Thing as Privacy “It was even conceivable that they watched us all the time.” These are the words Winston Smith and all of Oceania had to live by. George Orwell’s 1984 warns us about totalitarian regimes. The government, Big Brother, abolishes the citizen’s freedom and their own personal privacy, and even into their personal thoughts.…
Many people say that the government needs to be able to have control over people's cell phones and they need to know what everyone is doing on the internet. This issue is called Privacy v.s. Safety. Many people would want to give up their ‘right to privacy’ in order to be safe and other people would just rather have their privacy.…
For as long as the United State’s government has been formed, there has been the argument of how much individual privacy people deserve. Cornell University Law School states the fourth amendment as "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " The government though presents the argument to gain access to people’s lives for safety preventing terrorism, such as the unforgettable day of September 11, 2001. Also, the government uses medical records turned in…
Society has always thought that it had the freedom and privacy it was enlightened to have in the United States of America. Most of society has not been enlightened with knowledge that they are most likely being watched all the time. Just like in the novel 1984, by George Orwell, the citizens are always being watched and have no privacy for themselves. Privacy is something that individuals greatly value but do not truly consider until it is taken away. The totalitarian government 's need to control, manipulate, and subvert the rights of its citizens in 1984 mirrors the United States government operation today.…
There are many disputes debating on whether the Patriot Act should be legal or not. The Patriot Act’s purpose is to “[make] it easier for the government to obtain the orders and allowed for greater coordination among intelligence agencies and law enforcement”(Philadelphia, par 14). But at what point is obtaining information from the American citizens too far? The issue for this debate is does the Patriot Act violate the people's rights. This debate has been going on since 2001 as some view the Patriot Act as unconstitutional while others believe it’s protecting the safety of the people.…
According to the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause…” Yet, in the United States at this very moment, the government is collecting information on everyone who makes any kind of call, sends any kind of email, plays any kind of video game, or owns any kind of computer. They are in people’s houses without actually having a need to be there. This collection of information is unlawful and unconstitutional, violating exactly what the government is supposed to uphold – the Constitution. One can see the same thing happening to the…
The United States has developed into a super power nation and the world has felt the presence from the States. From the early 2001 terrorist attacks, the U.S. has been a hotspot of continuous terrorist attacks and groups forming in order to have a larger presence in the middle east. The U.S.’s presence in the middle east led to a record length war known as the War on Terror. Recent terror attacks in the U.S. have shown to provoke action from the government such as the Patriots Act. Islam has also grown to play a large part in the U.S. and the way the people of the U.S. function.…
In the 21st century, security is a difficult thing to maintain with all the technology and social media that is available we have on hand. Information is entirely too easy to obtain if you put it on the internet, but what if you don’t? The information you share on social media is fair game but the information you share in the privacy over the phone during a call should be respected. Security should not invade liberties without going up for a vote to support the democracy system we have in the country today. The NSA ran a convert operation, ACT 215, where they would tap phones to collect information in the hopes of finding terrorist activity, but the their efforts were futile.…
In agreement with Jeremy Bender from Business Insider “The 11 Most Powerful Militaries in the World” The United States has been known to be one of the top leading forces for national security in the world making it number one. From the US Air Force protecting airspace, and cyberspace to the Navy, recognized as the seagoing service as it protects the oceans around the world making it as secure as possible to travel. From the highest point of the earth to the lowest point, the United States Department of Defense which is based in the Pentagon, works around the clock making sure the nation’s security is stable and out of any possible risks. National security must and should be the nation’s top priority with all things happening outside the United…