Gonzales Investigation

Improved Essays
Investigating
Once police have received enough information about a crime they pursue the investigation process. It took police 11 months to gather enough evidence to arrest Gonzales. The investigation process was long and Gonzales repeatedly misled police and gave false alibis which he paid to keep his story. Upon arrival the police witness the father and mother’s bodies of Gonzales, they were lifeless and blood stained covered the bodies and the floor, there was no sight of the murder weapons (baseball bat and knife). These items were never found however after gaining a warrant and starting a private investigation, blue spray paint was found on the wall stating racist remarks, bloody footprints that matched the ones in a box in his cupboard
…show more content…
After this it proceeded to the Supreme Court of Australia. This court is constituted under The Supreme Court Act 1970. R v Gonzales was heard in this court as it was a serious indictable offence, it involved murder and was heard by a jury and a judge. It was first heard in the Local Court to establish a prime facie. The Supreme Court has the highest level of formality and can carry high consequences; this is another reason why the Supreme Court was chosen for the case of R v Gonzales. Original Jurisdiction was used for this …show more content…
The police undertake an investigation process and gather all evidence needed in the criminal trial. In the Gonzale’s case the police investigators played an integral role in gathering all evidence needed. It took 11 months for police to gather enough evidence to arrest and charge Sef Gonzales so this was a huge role in the whole trial process. The police prosecutors gathered evidence such as DNA, papers, files from his computer.
Solicitors
The solicitor’s role is to gather all evidence and information needed to represent either the defence or prosecution in a trial. It is then the role of the barrister to conduct cross examination and present their side’s case.
Identify the Plea
A plea is ‘ a formal statement of guilt or innocence by the accused’ (Cambridge legal studies textbook HSC).
Gonzales pleaded not guilty. He Stated “that he would not plead guilty to offences which he had not committed in order to make other people happy, notwithstanding that he had been told that, if he pleaded guilty and showed remorse, he might receive lesser sentences. “ (www.Austlii.com)

Factors Affecting the Sentencing decision
Aggravating

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION This essay examines the Australian court hierarchy, and the extension power the High Court attains as it has the ability too overturn decisions made by the Supreme Court. As it is the final court of appeal therefore reintegrates the point that the power of appointment is held within the body of the High Court. As the Australian Federal system consists of national court and a court system for each individual state and the two territories.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let’s begin with the killing of Los Angeles Police Department officer Kevin Gaines. He was shot by undercover officer frank Lyga. Lyga was involved in a road rage incident with Gaines and suspected him of being a gang member. After his untimely death it came to be known that on his off duty time he worked as a security guard. It also came to light that this was not his first road rage case where he would threaten drives with a gun.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda vs Arizona 1963 Miranda vs Arizona is one of the most significant Supreme Court decisions in United States history. On March 13, 1963 a man kidnapped a young girl from her job at a movie theater; he then took her to the Arizona desert where he raped her, robbed her and then proceeded to drop her off a few blocks from her home in Phoenix, Arizona. Ernesto Miranda, the convicted criminal, had a long previous record that included crimes such as armed robbery, as well as a juvenile record that included attempted rape, assault, and burglary. Miranda was found shortly after the crimes and was brought in for questioning.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merit Selection In Texas

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The amendment also gave this court full responsibility for all the criminal cases from the local trial courts. Texas is one of only two states that has separate high courts for civil and criminal matters. James Mann Hurt was the first presiding judge for this new court that functioned as the state’s highest criminal court and the judges served six year terms. In 1934 the Court of Criminal Appeals was granted authority to select commissioners whose decisions were considered final once approved by the regular…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Dilemmas of Defense Attorneys Defense attorneys have to face the ethical dilemma every day of whether or not to defend their client as well as whether or not to maintain that lawyer-client privilege. The lawyer-client privilege provides a security blanket for the client. Under this privilege, the client can almost tell the lawyer just about anything in confidence and not have to worry about the possible fear of being judged or incriminating themselves. A defense attorney serves as a guide that you can basically tell all your deepest darkest secrets to. However, some of those secrets may not always be able to be kept confidential, so be careful about what secrets you share.…

    • 3179 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining in the criminal justice system is a controversial practice. There are people who believe plea bargaining is an injustice towards both the innocent and the victims. There are people who believe plea bargaining is morally acceptable. No matter how many people believe it is a defect in the criminal justice system, plea bargaining will always exist. Plea bargaining is a negotiation in which the defendant agrees to enter a plea of guilty to a lesser charge and the prosecutor agrees to drop a more serious charge.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a homicide investigation, there are many factors which may impact the likelihood of a successful case. In order for a suspect to be convicted on trial, investigative processes must be followed that involve several imperative elements. However, sometimes these procedures aren’t followed and it is in these circumstances that major errors and flaws in the inquiry process are exhibited. It is then due to this that recommendations and frameworks must be created in order to avoid such weaknesses in future cases. Although, sometimes extrinsic factors, such as the influence of the media, may also impact the outcomes of such cases.…

    • 1989 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper examines the second critical thinking question found at the end of chapter 7 in Robert Aberle 's text, The Administration of Justice an Introduction to the Criminal Justice System in America. I will present a discussion highlighting the “differences between probable cause and reasonable suspicion and what each of these levels of evidence allow a police officer to do” (Aberle 2014). Aberle 's accretions will be presented and contrasted with my own. First off I 'm going to start with reasonable suspicion for this is most of the time the first step to probable cause. What is reasonable suspicion in Robert Aberle 's text this is how he describes reasonable suspicion "Reasonable suspicion can be defined as the level of…

    • 1035 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thought-out history there has been many pioneers to law enforcement. From the Father of law enforcement August Vollmer and Jim Fisher, who created many criminal investigative techniques just to name a few. The different levels of law enforcement are very important aspect to consider, that being federal, state and local. Each level is just as important as the other is, but different at the same time. Nevertheless one cannot operate without the other which allows the criminal justice as a whole to balance as one.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The prosecutors are considered to be the most influential actors within the courthouse, as they decide which case to prosecute, the cases to plea-bargain, and the case to try. The prosecutor may also influence the factors of setting bail and creating the sentence. In the United States Constitution, one’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel is granted as many defendants cannot afford to hire a lawyer, they are provided a public defender also known as the defense attorney. The defense attorneys encourage their clients to think about how the jury will assess them as guilty beyond reasonable doubt, therefore most will plead guilt. The judge plays a major authority role in the criminal justice system whether it is in state courts, or larger courts.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Offender Vs Prosecutor

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To have a successful prosecution of an offender, the prosecutor must carefully examine the offenses and clearly document the investigations with the highest levels of professionalism. Although different crimes have different penalties, it is the work of the prosecutor to ensure that they analyze the crime and identify relevant facts and charges of the given offense. The first thing that we should understand is that the work of the prosecutor is to seek justice and not merely convict. The prosecutors do this by protecting the innocent and convicting the guilty while still ensuring guarding their rights. In their bid to enforce the law, it is up to the prosecutor to have the knowledge of the work of the police investigating the crimes.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Plaintiff in this case has failed to form a prima facie case that either general or specific jurisdiction exists over the Defendant. The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) was granted and the Defendant was given leave to amend. In order for a District Court to hear a case it must have jurisdiction.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The investigators gets evidence from the crime scene, and takes to a labortory and multiple tests on the it. Sometimes science aspects don’t always help solve the…

    • 1006 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nature of Plea Bargaining in the American Criminal Justice System Many conceptualize the American criminal justice system as consisting of trials where prosecutors and defense attorneys argue over the defendant’s innocence. However, the truth is that the traditional court norm of a full-fledged trial is becoming increasingly rare as time goes on. As the population grows, more court cases will naturally enter the court system.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays