In the past years, supporters of globalization did not ever respond to the objection that individuals who opposed globalization had made. Opponents of globalization brought up the concern that the uniform outcome of globalization would cause intense isolation of cultures and increasing disconnection of societies globally.
Alienation Breeds Fanaticism
What the anti-globalization movement guessed about regarding the effects of globalization have been found correct. Wrongly identified as Islamic or religious extremism, crowd uproars, explosives, and bomb schemes are all concerning Islam and Muslim leaders accidently but most importantly the isolation of cultures and detachment of societies that globalization …show more content…
The reducing integration between societies and cultures and its outcomes are more difficult to take in to account, which leaves the society oblivious to the outcomes. However, these outcomes of the reducing social and cultural integration are definitely obvious when they occur. Some obvious indications of these outcomes are explosives being set off in Bali and London, crowd uproars taking place in Paris and Sydney, and bombs being dropped on Afghan and Iraqi. In other words, globalization and terrorism is at fault for all of this. According to Emile Durkheim’s book Suicide, to make sense of suicides themselves and the reason for the dissimilar suicide measures in different places, there should first be a search and recognition of what factors might have given rise to suicide nationally before inferring the effects of suicide nationally. This process of finding out the causes and the effects is necessary for comprehending terrorism also. To perceive what terrorism is worldwide, the worldwide reason of terrorism should be pointed out to make a clear description of terrorism. Globalization being in the year of 1986 with the North American Free Trade Agreement, its system of principles is the real pushing