While many people refuted the letter as any shred of a possibility of truth, his words were still seen and read. The British minister in Brussels, even after having a stern lecture on Williams’ faslehoods by none other than Leopold himself, wrote back to his home country acknowledging that despite Leopold’s interference, there was “a good deal of agreeable truth in his pamphlets.” In another instance, a missionary who had visited the Congo credited all of Williams’ claims. However, the man didn’t think it was his place to question Leopold’s
While many people refuted the letter as any shred of a possibility of truth, his words were still seen and read. The British minister in Brussels, even after having a stern lecture on Williams’ faslehoods by none other than Leopold himself, wrote back to his home country acknowledging that despite Leopold’s interference, there was “a good deal of agreeable truth in his pamphlets.” In another instance, a missionary who had visited the Congo credited all of Williams’ claims. However, the man didn’t think it was his place to question Leopold’s