George Orwell

Improved Essays
George Orwell condemns the ugly as well as inaccurate writing of English and examines the link between political convention and the degradation of language. One of Orwell's major points is that the great enemy of clear language is insincerity (Hopkinson, 2013). The insincerity of the writer perpetuates the decline of the language as people particularly politicians attempt to disguise their intentions behind euphemisms and convoluted phrasing.
As Orwell says that this decline is self-perpetuating. He takes it as poor English since the language is in decline. And as the language declines, "foolish" thoughts become even easier, reinforcing the original cause. According to Orwell meaningless words are used to stop the reader from seeing the point
…show more content…
Currently people are taking classes to learn English or are using grammatical apps to correct them and come up with correct and simpler word for people to understand. More so when it comes to spelling correction we use dictionaries.
English language was designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind in politics. In politics English language used was necessarily vague or meaningless since it was intended to hide the truth rather than express it. This unclear prose was a contagion which had spread to those who did not intend to hide the truth, and it concealed a writer's thoughts from himself and others. Here we find that Orwell encourages concreteness and clarity as an alternative of vagueness and individuality over political conformity.
People have a tendency of using hackneyed imagery and prefabricated phrases which are of no importance so long as one makes one's meaning clear. Mostly they use it to have good prose style and to decorate their work and as well to express a meaning that they cannot explain further what it means so they use the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Body Paragraph 2: • Orwell indicates that may people interpret words differently from what the writer intended. • “Words… are often used in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different” (Orwell 5). Body Paragraph 3: • Orwell understands what would not be said in regards to political writing. • “Consider for instance some comfortable English professor defending Russian totalitarianism.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Australia we are never going to speak the same way. Why is that? Antstralia is arguably one of the most culturally diverse nations in the world. Our diversity extends from food to culture to our widely varying language.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Orwell’s essay talks about something that most people do not think about very much. I mean when you are speaking to someone or writing an essay you are not thinking about the proper language to use you are mostly just saying things the way you hear others say it everyday. In some ways I would have to agree with Orwell though because we use so much slang today sometimes it can be just plain confusing especially if the person is using it wrong. I am going to admit I have caught myself writing a paper and starting to use slang but catch myself before I finish typing it and I also probably break at least a few of his rules each time I write a paper.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Lutz, “it is a language designed to alter our perception of reality and corrupt our thinking” (352). In other words, Lutz believes that the intentional misuse and abuse of the English language is intended to deliberately manipulate and sway people in a direction that they would not normally take. My feelings are that if people do not know the difference between what is true and what is fabricated, people will easily fall prey and play into the hands of the manipulators. As these manipulators influence more people’s way of thinking, their jargon will seem more convincing and less questionable to the susceptible uninformed. This not only reflects the power that the English language carries when it is used nefariously, it also reveals the large influence it plays on whether a given situation is perceived as favorable or unfavorable.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Orwell explains that his writing is a product of the times, and that if he had lived in peaceful times it would be likely that his fiction would be very different than it is ow. However, he writes about what is necessary to write about: anti-totalitarianism and pro-democracy. What is interesting to this reader was Orwell’s confessions at the end of the essay, stating that all writers are rather possessed by a strange demon because writing is really not very enjoyable.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not everyone has the gift to speak, those who cannot express themselves by verbal means must find other ways in which they are to express themselves; some who cannot speak use sign language to communicate with those who are able while others may use writing to communicate. Although, these various forms of communication differ they all similarly end up being converted into words. People don't necessarily realize the importance of word they underestimate them using thing as they please never asking how when or why words function exactly the way they do. For centuries man has continued to create more and more words as well as various ways to use them. we don't know when words first starred for their debut exactly however it doesn't take much to…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1984 Individual Vs Society

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Orwell argues that the English language is declining ad that this may have “political and economic causes”, but this process could be reversible where the decline in politics and economy is caused by poor language (Orwell, Politics and the english language, 1946, p. 1). Orwell says that the English language is “full of bad habits”, but ridding the language of these bad habits is the “first step toward political regeneration” (Orwell, Politics and the english language, 1946, p. 1). Orwell gave many examples of how the English language was deteriorating. His first example was dying metaphors which Orwell describes as lazy. When metaphors are repeated over and over again they lose their “evocative power” and emphasizes laziness, because no one is attempting to invent new metaphors (Orwell, Politics and the english language, 1946, p. 3).…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deliver Us from the Labyrinth of Madness: Character Affect in Djuna Barnes 's Nightwood Language is a labyrinth we are born into lost. Only by leaving breadcrumbs, threading our subject, does one remember whence s/he came, where his/her subject ends and begins. Language may offer a solution to reduce problems into simplicity, but for such problems it conceals in language the people suffering within it. The alcoholic, the prostitute, the shameful, are made into monstrous forms by the epithets defining their subject: where language presumes they have no shame, immoral epithets drown those in pity for a subject "incapable" of change.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1984 Figurative Language

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Nineteen Eighty-Four the ethical principle of human probity that can easily be subverted, is shown through Orwell's use of vocabulary choice. Orwell’s style of words that incorporate this ideology includes a wide range of figurative language, symbolism, and motifs. The style of language is embodied to show the human morals can be compromised due to the effectiveness of vocabulary choices. As Nineteen Eighty-Four…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1984 George Orwell

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Human beings, personal memory and personal experience are all history that exists. "1984," by George Orwell, tells the story of Winston Smith (the protagonist), the thirty-nine year old man who is part of the Outer Party and is living in the mystical place of Oceania ruled by a totalitarian Party that monitors every movement of every member in their society. In regard's to Gary Alan Fine's news article, "George Orwell and the N.C.A.A.", the problem of erasing all the wins of Penn State's football victories from 1998 to 2011 because of a crime not committed by the actual team but, by one person. That is like saying a whole class of students participating in a game tournament should be stripped off of all their achievements, because one person cheated. The N.C.A.A. is wrong in the sense of vacating all the wins that were made by the hardworking team, and this is similar to 1984 because, changing history is controlling the past and by controlling the past, the present is…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the novel 1984 George Orwell creates a dystopian future. He imagined a system of public surveillance where people do not have privacy in public or in their own homes. Orwell predicts that people will give up their personal freedoms, and right to privacy out of fear. The system created in 1984 seems clumsy and avoidable but the surveillance system imagined by Orwell pales in comparison to what our government is capable of doing. What Orwell presented in his novel has not only come to pass, but has superseded his expectations and in reality what the government is able to do is far more sophisticated.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    No matter how big or small the issue, he wanted women to depend on the men of of the society to help them. This shows how narrow Orwell’s thoughts are about women and how much they can…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Farm Essay

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Texts are commonly written as an expression of the attitudes or ideas within a certain time period. Furthermore, the way in which these texts are produced often reflect the social and political sensitivity at that certain time. During the mid-1930s, George Orwell like many of his literary partners became progressively more observant of the social and political concerns of the era. Orwell’s knowledge of the social sensitivity at the time allowed him to decide upon a proper medium through which he could communicate his message safely. This contrasts modern literature, represented in weddings and beheadings, in this text, the cruel nature of the topic is not euphemised, rather, the cruel nature of the topic is enhanced and strategically used by…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    George Orwell is clear that humans should use their own thought into language and outdated words should no longer be used because that is restricting understanding and creativity. As language develops with time, Orwell stresses that using “pretentious language” is just another tool for creating a false sense of sophistication, and it fails to create easy understanding of a message. Language is fluid and using outdated terminology regresses the process; a nation and society grows only if the individuals can progress with time and old phrases fails to aid that process. He also mentions that “using stale metaphors, similes, and idioms, you save much mental effort, at the cost of leaving your meaning vague, not only for your reader but for yourself.” Language is a process by which one evokes thought and expression of ideas, but when one relies upon other individual’s phrases to convey a meaning, the process of thinking is lost and only memory application exists.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Language

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Even the words we have used as recently as the 30’s have developed, things are no longer ‘spiffing’ they are great. This example becomes even more exaggerated and apparent when we compare the language of Shakespearian England to today. If there had been a band of people to rally against the word ‘thy’ becoming ‘thee’ and then ultimately the word we know today ‘the’ then we would perhaps still have linguistic feet planted in the past. As is stands new words enter the dictionary every year. There is not argument when ‘copernicium’ enters the dictionary (a word so new the spell check on my computer doesn’t recognise)…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays