Genetically Modified Salmon Case Study

Improved Essays
To create genetically modified salmon the salmons' DNA is altered using genetic engineering. In the genetically engineered salmon, there are the added growth genes from the Oncorhynchus tshawytscha or more commonly known as the pacific chinook salmon, and the switch-on gene from the Zoarces americanus, or more commonly known as the ocean pout. To input these genes from the pacific chinook salmon and the ocean pout into the salmon, recombinant DNA technology is used. The scientists first identify what genes they would like to add, in this case the genes of interest are the growth gene and the switch-on gene, and isolate them. After identifying the desired genes, restriction enzymes, which cut the DNA at specific areas, are used to remove …show more content…
These added genes give the result of faster growth, increased nutrition and the need for less feed for the salmon to grow. To add these genes to the salmon, the same restriction enzymes are used on the salmon's DNA to have the correct bases for the desired DNA to attach to (Phelan, J. (2015)). The desired genes are then inserted into the genome of the salmon using the plasmid and finally added into the egg and grown like natural salmon. In my opinion, in terms of development and sale, there are more benefits than risks in introducing genetically modified salmon into the market. Many fear the sale genetically modified salmon because it is the first animals to be sold to the public as only genetically modified crop has been sold so far. There is also fear for human and environmental health. Many fear that the genetically modified salmon could cause allergic reactions because the modified salmon …show more content…
Manufacturers have the option and choice of labeling the modified salmon, meaning they could not label the modified salmon. Because labeling is not mandatory, it is not likely the manufacturers will label the genetically modified salmon as it could potentially reduce sales. Many avoid genetically modified food products and prefer organic produce even though organic products are more expensive. It would be more likely the manufacturers of organic salmon will label their natural salmon to increase prices. The labeling of genetically modified salmon should be mandatory and enforced for sale. The labels should have the names of the animal the added genes come from in case there are certain species or animals consumers are allergic to. By enforcing labeling, any negative reactions and health problems due to the genetically modified salmon could be quickly and efficiently treated. The consumer would be well informed of what they are purchasing and consuming.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Flavr Savr Research Paper

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ninety percent of feed grain production is due to dramatically changed corn (techrepublic). Industrial livestock benefits from this feed grown by farmers in the midwest over eighty million acres (techrepublic). Corn is also produced as the main ingredient in some foods we use everyday such as sweeteners and corn oil (techrepublic). Crop yield monitors invented in 1990 through technology has caused the production of corn to dramatically increase in the last twenty-five years (techrepublic).…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gmo Salmon Research Paper

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    GMO Salmon Paper: Intro Genetically altered organisms are that of organisms that have been added or reduced traits and characteristics of their native counterparts. The genetically engineered salmon is one such organism. The genetically modified salmon, dubbed the AquAdvantage Salmon is an Atlantic salmon with a growth hormone from a Chinook salmon and a gene from the ocean (Dennis, B. 2012).…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Tomato That Kills: GMOs Negatively Affect People's Lives Genetically modified organisms are present in 60 to 70 percent of foods on US supermarket shelves (Cadwell). In 1982 the FDA approves the first GMO. Then in 1994 GMOs are put on the grocery store shelves. The first food that was approved with GMOs in them were the Flavr Savr tomatoes (Shireen). Since GMOs were made, many controversies about the health risks associated with the foods have occurred.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, labeling should be a very important part being made in a product in the GMO industry, making sure people understand how dangerous it truly is for us. Also major companies that work with GMOs are starting to monopolize their own products to increase productivity with their own farming using biotechnology. The result of this will mean farmers will have to start buying these seeds instead. If GMO use is going to be here to stay then the government should create laws that will force these companies to have labels, not protect them, and force that are creating and using these products. With the amount of known effects Genetically Modified Organisms Should not be allowed in our foods today.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gmo Overfishing Benefits

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Pages

    GMOs are beneficial, and the benefits of using GMOs outweigh the risks in most circumstances. Genetically modified crops decrease insecticide use and help prevent overuse since the crops are able to produce an insecticide; the insecticide produced by genetically modified crops is not harmful to humans and only kills specific insects. There are also ways that help prevent insects from becoming resistant to the insecticides used. Genetically modified crops, like golden rice, can also help provide more nutrients to people in developing countries that are suffering from malnutrition. Genetically modified animals, such as salmon, that are modified to grow faster, can help reduce the pressure placed on wild salmon stocks that are caused by overfishing.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    GMO products should and do follow the existing rules for labeling products. To require GMO producers to follow a different set of rules for the same product puts them at an unfair disadvantage in the market place. Labeling would not address any real safety concerns and serve only to misled consumers. Don’t be misled on the need for labeling, there isn’t…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ones that design the labels would have to figure out where to place it, how big of a font to put it in, and if they want that to catch the attention of the customer or just have it as extra information on the label that no one can read. This topic is really up for anyone to grab because it affects everyone since it’s in all foods that we consume. The opponents of GMOs being labeled are the farmers that make products through mass production and the companies that buy the food from them. These people would have a problem with it because if the customers don’t want to buy their products because of the GMOs the company will have to change and adapt to please the customer.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Requiring Labeling of GMO…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genetic Modifying them moves discrete genes or blocks of genes at a time. For example the growth of genetically modified salmon can make the salmon grow larger from their offspring before. Almost 3x the length that they usually are. These traits that are transferred can be more predictable for the scientist the wondering how big these baby salmon will grow. This example shows that having a more predictable reproduction can benefit our research and the way that animals can reproduce faster can help animals from going…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Technology Won’t Feed the World’s Hungry,” Anuradha Mittal discusses the problems with genetically engineered food and economic issues of India. Mittal argues genetically modified food is not a solution to global hunger, because world hunger is an economic problem. I disagree, because GMOS can cure world hunger. The world is becoming more educated and tolerant of genetically modified food, such that any health concerns about GMOS are outweighed by the benefits. There are various kinds of GMOS, however I will be discussing GMOS as it relates to agriculture needs.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Salmon is one of the world’s most popular fish to eat and therefore the need for a viable solution to preserving the species was needed. Salmon farms utilize genetically modified fish to be raised to full grown fish in a confined area. However good this is for the salmon eating population we can still see a slight negative impact on the environment due to some of these genetically modified Salmon escaping captivity and breeding with ordinary Salmon, thus creating a slightly different Salmon breed. This great source explains some of the challenges we face "Salmon Farms Pose Significant Threat to Salmon Fisheries in the Pacific Northwest, Researchers Find: 9/03." Stanford News.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Organic grocery stores only sell foods which have not been altered in any way. Many people who are against GMOs rather spend a little more money on organic foods than buying foods that contain genetically modified ingredients. Another reason to as why those who are against foods that contain genetically modified ingredients avoid them is because in the United States companies aren’t required to label their foods so many don’t like that they don’t really know what they’re eating. I understand that it’s good to know what the food we consume contains, but when foods are genetically modified they are being modified to either have more nutrition values or the food derives from a crop which has been modified to withstand certain conditions. FAQs About GMOs state that, “GMO labeling is mandatory in more than 60 countries but not in the U.S. opponents to mandatory labeling here often say that it unfairly implies that foods with genetically engineered ingredients are unsafe” (2).…

    • 1048 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I still believe that they should be labeled. I don’t think the government and GMO companies should be deciding what we should know about our food. If the food is safe and has almost no difference from organic food they might as well label it. When they do not label it, it makes it seem like they are trying to hide something from us People should have a choice in what they eat and feed their…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquadvantage Salmon Paper

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Biotechnology company, AquaBounty Technologies engaged in the research, development, and commercialization of products using biotechnology to increase the productivity of aquaculture. In the late 1980s, AquaBounty Technologies developed first genetically modified animal, AquAdvantage salmon (Varela 2013, Greenberg 2014). AquAdvantage salmon defined as genetically-engineered Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) which have a rapid-growth phenotype. This salmon contain a single copy of the stably integrated α form of opAFP-GHc2 at α locus in the EO-1 α line. OpAFP-GHc2 is a recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (rDNA) compose of regulatory sequences from an ocean pout (Macrozoarces americanus)…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics