Genetic Enhancement Essay

Improved Essays
This ethical study will define the limitations of genetic enhancements for children in the theories posited by Julian Savulescu (2007) and Michael Sandel (year?). Savulescu (2007) defines some of the overarching responsibility of parents to use whatever means necessary to improve the lives of their children, which is a moral and ethical obligation in the use of genetic enhancements. However, Sandel (year?) countermands this argument by claiming that parents will more likely use genetic enhancement to control the outcome of the child’s development, and more dangerously, crate a child that will out-compete other children. This form of ambition and hierarchical perspective is a damaging and conflict-based problem in genetic enhancement because …show more content…
This perspective defines the potentially devastating view of perfection, yet these perfections are simply not possible in the natural world: “Overly ambitious parents are prone to get carried away with transforming love—promoting and demanding all manner of accomplishments from their children, seeking perfection” (p.7). In this manner, it is important to understand the limitations of human life, which is always changing and morphing tin the evolutionary process, which makes perfection a very dangerous objective to “overly ambitious” parents that do not understand the ramifications of genetic enhancement for their child …show more content…
In this context, it is important to understand the medical technology does offer surgical repairs to the human body, which does improve the life of the patient. More so, parents are traditionally obligated to provide the best training and diet for their children as part of the healthy family unit,. Certainly, no one wants to neglect their child, but there are more complicated issues related to genetic enhancement that is part of using medical technology to alter the genetic structure of a living entity before it is “born.” I agree with Savulescu on the already present state of technology in medical and surgical progress for already developed human beings, but I think it wrong to pre-form children through genetic enhancement. Children should have the right to choose their own destiny, but it is apparent that parents will be able to choose this role for them through their own premeditated life choices. In this manner, Sandel provides a more compelling understanding of the freedom and randomness of birthing a child, which should not be constructed around the personal whims of the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The author talks about how the conversation around eugenics is similar to the Pro-Choice movement in the 1960-70s. She explains how there is a stigma behind the word “eugenics” and questions whether it’s wrong to use new technology to improve the human race. She concludes the article by talking about the political opposition of eugenics. This article will be useful in the paper because it provides a different perspective of the ethics behind biotechnology.…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One controversial topic that provokes debate is genetic modification. In the essay “Proposed Treatment to Fix Genetic Diseases Raises Ethical issues” the author Rob Stein explains the process of genetic engineering and suggests a solution. The government is debating if the should let scientists “make changes in some of the genetic material” in the egg so the baby will not have certain genes. The main goal is to “help women deliver healthy, normal children.” There are some risks with this process such as birth defects.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this enthralling, enlightening book, Ronald M. Green’s Babes by Design: The Ethics of Genetic Design explores the potential promise and threat in the innovation of genetic engineering. Babies by Design offers several elements of the complicated subject: it presents an eloquent description of the sophisticated technology and science, it clearly recaps the reasonable arguments for and against numerous exercises of biotechnology, and it relates the ideas of science fiction to that of the uncertain future. Green graduated Summa Cum Laude at Brown University, before receiving his Ph.D. in religious ethics from Harvard University in 1973. Green has written nine books and more than 170 articles on theoretical and applied ethics. This gives him…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Walter Glannon explores several moral problems with genetic enhancement in his article “Genetic Enhancement,” published in Glannon’s book, From Genes and Future people: Philosophical Issues in Human Genetics (and later in Bioethics Principles, Issues, and Cases.) Glannon believes that “gene therapy is permissible if it is intended to ensure or restore normal functions, but it is morally illegitimate if it is aimed at enhancing functions beyond normal.” (577) Glannon, a professor of bioethics and philosophy at the University of Calgary, holds the Canada Research Chair in Biomedical Ethics and Ethical Theory at the University of Calgary in Alberta. He is well known for publishing 4 books and over 27 articles related to bioethics and philosophy.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter four of Michael Sandel’s book The Case against Perfection: Ethics in an age of Genetic Engineering, he brings up the notion of the controversial notion of eugenics. Sandel divides this chapter up into three types of eugenics- all of which he eventually finds unconvincing at the end of the chapter. Sandel begins this chapter by defining what eugenics is and its origins. However, as he does this, he also goes in to describing this notion as a shaky and righteous movement coined by Sir Francis Galton and others who thought like him.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crispr Code Of Ethics

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For scientists who are waiting for an alternative to existing genome editing tools, Crispr-cas9 is the solution which is comparatively easy and effective in using. Crisper allows the researcher to edit, target, excise and stitch genes of their choice between two end cuts. Crispr has the potential to make such advances which researchers used to dream about. It worked so well, scientists began to issue ethical statements for its use particularly about the power of Crispr to change germline in humans which presents a hotly debatable issue. Genome editing in human germline could have unpredictable effects on future generations.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The development of this technology will lead to a society gap between those who are genetically enhanced and those who have “natural genes”. Additionally, this manipulation will also deprive a child from its natural rights and will cause hardships in the future. Lastly, genetic engineering has the potential of ending the life of the embryo due to its relatively new technology. This manipulation of genes will result in catastrophic outcomes that will harm…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states that the four main concerns about gene manipulation are the effect of gene modification on the parents, our freedom, our social divisions, and people’s religions. The first concern is if parents will replace the love for their child “with a consumerist mentality that seeks perfection” (Green 2). Parents who wish for healthy children and have one born with disabilities love their child unconditionally regardless of having perfect genes. Gene modification would not change this fact because “that child is already remarkably influenced by the genes they inherit” (Green 3). The second concern is if our freedom will be diminished “by making us creatures of our genes or of our parents’ whims” (Green 2).…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today, there are more thoughts about allowing parents to bioengineer their children. Instead of relying on fate to see how their baby turns out, some people want the power to genetically modify their kids before birth. For example, if a parent wanted a tall boy, they could predetermine this. Contrastingly, Michael Sandel argues bioengineering because again, it takes away the giftedness of children. He explains, “To appreciate children as gifts is to accept them as they come, not as objects of our design, or products of our will, or instrument of our ambition,” (45).…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Sandel in “The case Against Perfection” talks about benefits and drawbacks in genetic engineering, designer children, and bionic athletes. The benefit is that improving technological advancement, we will be able to treat and prevent many diseases that are prevalent today. The downside is that exponential growth of technologies will allow us to manipulate our own nature, to enhance our cognitive abilities, physical strength, and choose genetic traits of our children to make ourselves “better than well” (Sandel, 2004). Sandel argues that Genetic engineering offers us the power to master our nature, but that kind of power & choice threatens our ability to appreciate life as a gift, and erode human agency by allowing us to serve our purposes…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, many people think that if a child was genetically altered to be ‘better’, then they would be prouder or happier, but this is not necessarily true. If a baby was genetically altered to be smarter but they turn out to be average, the parents might criticize or reject them. This can have great effects on a child psychologically, as they will feel like they had not met their parent’s standards. This as well can lower the child’s self esteem. Another harmful effect is on designer saviour siblings is they may feel like their sole purpose is to save their sibling, and that they were not born because their parents wanted…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Babies

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Children affect the future and altering and correcting the genes of the child make these children different from the rest. Not only will this cause separation and individuality issues, however, this can also affect these genetically engineered children’s health, which may result in…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Designer Babies Imagine a society where kids grew up in a defect-free environment. Even if the technology that would create this seems distant, geneticists are actively researching it and there’s even a term for children that could be genetically modified. They’re called designer babies and could revolutionize the effects impairments have on our society. However, this new project could also have a negative effect on our society as well, such as the unsure success rate of the procedure. The use of this technology is a double edged sword, but I believe it could help create a more nourishing environment for youth for every child to thrive.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some believe that giving parents the option of genetically engineering their baby will result in eugenics driven by egoism. People might take advantage of germline manipulation by creating embryos that will be their own idea of what is perfect, thus objectifying and commodifying children. Some opposers even say that because these embryos will not have a say in whether they want to be modified or not, their rights will be taken away. Furthermore, regulating laws ensuring that genetic modification is used only for the correction of genuinely medical genetic conditions as opposed to enhancing a child’s appearance will be nearly impossible. Rich parents will use…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Future for Human Genetics People have been around long enough to know that everything changes (for the better or worse). Within the past few years, there has been a lot of debate over the scientific breakthrough of being able to modify the human genome. Many doctors and scientists have welcomed the idea with open minds while others are hesitant to become involved. Some see the dangers involved with the process while others see the endless possibilities coming out of this revolutionary discovery.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays