Genesco V. Visa US Inc. Case Study

Improved Essays
Genesco V Visa USA Inc. et al Genesco filed a motion suggesting partial summary judgment several days after Visa U.S.A Inc. filed another motion to dismiss. Genesco’s motion was a request to the court to determine the noncompliance of Visa’s PCI violated contracts made by Visa and the acquiring banks and this surmounted to unenforceable penalties. As a response to Genesco’s motion, Visa managed to raise a total of six defenses. One of the main issues that were raised in Visa’s defense was that Genesco totally ignored that it was obligated with the burden of proof to show that the facts presented regarding Visa breaching the contract were not disputable. Visa further extended its argument claiming that, basically, Genesco is requesting the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In the case of Casimaty v FCT 97 ATC 5135, the taxpayer was doing fencing and farming business, which his father inherited an amount of 998 acres land that was known as “Acton View” (Australian Tax Casebook p.162). He then purchased another 40 acres of land, which he built a homestead. As time goes by, he suffered some sort of difficulties as there were drought, severe financial debts, and as well as poor health condition. As he had no alternatives, so he decided to sell-off portions of the land from time to time as to reduce the burden of his debt. There was a series of eight subdivisions and a large portion of property was sold.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I’m surprised a plea deal was not discussed between the two parties involving a licensing or sponsorship contract as it seems these two companies may be targeting an overlapping…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case: U.S. v. Orozco-Santillan Citation: 903 F.2d 1262 (9th Cir. 1990) Procedural History: The United States District Court for Central District of California indicted Alfredo Orozco-Santillan on three counts of threatening to assault a federal law enforcement officer. Evidence regarding threatening telephone call received by immigration officer was sufficient to establish defendant's identity as caller, as required to support conviction for threatening federal law enforcement officer; officer recognized defendant's voice, contents of call revealed information contained by the defendant, and the defendant admitted to making the call. He was sentenced to 18 months in confinement and three years probation. He appealed on count two and three, arguing that the government failed to prove his statements were threats, and on count one that he was the actual caller. The Court of Appeals reviewed the denial for motion and the evidence, and found Orozco-Santillan was guilty on all charges since there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict by the jury.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my court case Witherwax v Transcare, Inc. 2005 NY. Transcare ambulance transported Witherwax to the hospital 2000, and the transcare employee didn’t recorded the right address for Witherwax resulting in Witherwax not receiving a bill for the services performed by transcare. Transcare sent witherwax bill to a collection agency. Witherwax claims that Paul Michael reported the debt to the three credit reporting agencies as being "seriously past due. Witherwax tried to resolve the debt, but learned that the invoice had been sent to an incorrect address: 30 West 61st Street, New York City, 10023, Apt.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: Bratton et. al. v. McDonough 91 A. 3d 1050 (2014) Background of Case: This is a civil case. It was tried by jury on July 16, 2012 in the State of Maine Superior Court of Somerset County. The jury found for the defendant.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thelma Agnes Smith v. David Phillip Riley, Statement of facts. The plaintiff and defendant cohabited together for numerous years without entering into marriage or civil union. Although, there was a romantic relationship. Unfortunately, the relationship has soured resulting in the need to liquidate assets that were acquired within joint ownership. The plaintiff and defendant had both agreed previously to how the assets would be divided, this agreement was not followed therefore litigation commenced.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Elridge V.: Case Study

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Elbridge’s divorced in 2010 and Mrs. Gwen Eldridge was awarded custody of their two minor children. Mr. Eldridge was ordered to make child support payments of $700 per month. He lost his job as an electrician in January of 2011 and was unemployed from that date through October of 2011. Upon which Mr. Eldridge received a job in his field as an electrician. Unfortunately, Mr. Eldridge did not make child support payments for the 10 months that he was unemployed.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judge Casas’ Ruling In APUSA Inc. v The State of California the court rules in favor of APUSA,Inc. The court finds the State of California violated the establishment clause using the Lemon Test and Agostoni test. In both instances the CCQEA explicitly violates the establishment clause by way of money being directly distributed from the government to the religious institutions, joined with a lack of specificity of how the money is to be used. The State of California would be served in adding guidelines to the law clearly dictating that grant money is not to be used for secular purpose.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. Name: Sillasse Bryan v. United States II. Legal Citation: 524 U.S. 184 (1998) III. Statement of Facts: On trial was Mr. Sillasse Bryan for a conviction of “willfully” dealing guns without a federal license. The Firearms Owners' Protection Act (FOPA) was added to the Criminal Code to prohibit anyone from "willfully" dealing firearms without a federal license. If proven guilty of conviction, a fine or imprisonment may be imposed against anyone who "willfully" violates certain requirements of the Firearms Owners' Protection Act.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Identification: Legal Services Corporation v. Velazquez 531 U.S. 533 (2001) Facts: Carmen Velazquez, a 56-year-old grandmother, claimed her public assistance benefits were wrongfully terminated. Her benefits were terminated for failure to participate in a job search program without a pre-termination hearing. Without the pre-termination hearing, she was not allowed to present her physical impairment as cause for her inability to work.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the case of US vs. Gonzalez-Lopez lies many facts within the case. Some of the reliable facts is that a man named Cuauhtemoc Gonzalez-Lopez was charged with conspiracy to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. His family hired him an attorney by the name of John Fahle to represent him but Lopez had another person in mind. Lopez went ahead and hired attorney Joseph Low to represent him in the hopes of including him with Fahle or instead of. As time went on both attorneys represented Lopez but the Magistrate Judge only accepted Low’s provisional entry of appearance and allowed him to participate only if he immediately file a motion for admission pro hac vice.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument 1. The judgement for Appellee should be affirmed because the Appellant’s mother had apparent authority to consent to the search of the shoebox. Appellant’s mother, Ms. Fallsbauer, demonstrated apparent authority to consent to the search of the shoebox when she stated her prior ownership of the shoebox. (R. at 5.)…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did the Supreme Court determine that the plaintiff had a valid CEPA claim?…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Decision: Gonzales v. Raich The case of Gonzales v. Raich begins with the passing of the Compassionate Use Act, a California law that allows marijuana to be used medically. Angel Raich’s doctor recommended the use of medical marijuana for medicinal purposes; however, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents found the growing of Raich’s six marijuana plants to be a violation of of the federal law under the Controlled Substances Act. Passed using the interstate commerce clause, the act stated that possession of drugs was illegal, and did not recognize the use of marijuana medically.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genzyme Corporation Environmental Analysis By Dinithi Fernando S00177109 Executive Summary This report presents a decisive analysis of internal and external environments of Genzyme Corporation prior to its acquisition by Sanofi Plc. The analysis of environments is measured with the help of SWOT analysis, PESTEL analysis and Poter’s five force analysis. Moreover, this report also hit upon some problems that the company had to encounter while running the business in changing environment and recommendation as how Genzyme could sustain their independency through improving their production strategies.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays