Garza Vs Farias Case Study

Decent Essays
Garza v. Farias
FACTS
Eduardo G. Garza and Uni-Trade Fowarding, L.C., “the plaintiffs” filed a defamation suit against Dr. Hector Farias and Voices in Democratic Actions (VIDA), “the defendants”. This was in result of alleged political ties with Garza and Laredo city council members. This political tie resulted in his companies winning on a bid for the proposed lease. The defamation among Garza was the importance of this case. The defendants then filed a motion to dismiss to the Texas Citizen’s Participation Act, and the appeal followed.
ISSUES
Was there a violation of the First Amendment on defamation and with what evidence?
DECISION
The trial court denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss. They reversed the trial court’s order and rendered

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Manuel Pina Babbitt v. Arthur Calderon (1998) I agree with the guilty verdict of Manuel Pina Babbitt who was charged with first degree murder of Leah Schendel after she died due to heart failure in the course of his burglary, robbery and attempted rape. In addition, he was also convicted of the burglary and attempted rape of Mavis Wilson. Babbitt’s counsel presented an argument that used his mental health issues caused by Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) as a defense. However, I believe that his actions were a voluntary act. Before Babbitt entered the homes of those two women he had the criminal intent, which means that he intended on committing a crime.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Calder Case Summary

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Calder V. British Columbia Attorney General [1973] SCR 313 Calder case is a pacesetter for aboriginal jurisprudence in Canadian supreme court. It is the first to recognize that aboriginal title to land exist as a sui generis type of right in Canada at the time of time of the Royal Proclamation Order of 1763 and does not devolve from the colonial, Crown law, treaty or statute. The main issue for determination in this case was whether Crown authority lawfully extinguished the aboriginal title to the ancestral land occupied by the Nisga’a tribe that pre-existed at the time of the Royal Proclamation Order of 1763. The case was ended as a deadlock, the court split three to three in favor and against the appeal, while the seventh judge dismissed…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    tes. Gonzales V. Raich was foucsed on medical marijuana. In 1996, California passed the Compassionate Use Act ( CSA) which authorize for the use of medical marijuana. Compassionate Use Act is important because this law allow the paients to have medical marijuana to cut down the pain from disease. Seconds, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is executive barnce who is enfronec the druge usger and Drug Enforcement Adminstration are arrested the patients who are used and consummed marijuana.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Study: Bernardo V.

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tom, I have been talking with Mr. Bernardo (GPC’s lawyer) on a daily basis. Excluding the variables and with the joint effort of all, we understand that the lawsuit will have the following chronology: (A) Yesterday the GPC's lawyer talked with the Administrator of the Judicial Recovery. The Administrator would have said that the petition will be filed today to the case records. He also reported that will be favorable to the intended sale. (B) June 27th to July 6th - Period in which the process should be in the Prosecutor's Office.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    STATEMENT OF FACTS The plaintiff, Adrianna Estrada (“Estrada”) filed a complaint against the defendant, Wide Open Spaces Entertainment (“Open Spaces”) who own and operate (“The Continental”), an Austin, Texas Nightclub where Estrada used to be employed. Estrada claims that Rand E. Travis (“Travis”), manager of The Continental, discharged her in retaliation to a workers’ compensation claim. Estrada, a resident of Austin, makes a living singing and performing for local audiences. Specifically specializing in the sights, sounds, and styles of Carrie Underwood.…

    • 2227 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In her interview, Flores claimed that she never told Aguiar that she was going to arrest Vazquez for drunk in public. Additionally Flores said in her interview that she never told Scheppmann that she intended to arrest Vazquez for drunk in public and they wouldn’t be there on the second call is Vazquez was arrested the first time. Flores admits that she detained and handcuffed Vazquez in her backyard that was not open to the public.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On December 22nd, 2005, a class action lawsuit, Dickerson v. Gretna was filed on behalf of those blocked from crossing the CCC bridge after Katrina. The suit, after two supplementing amending complaints, alleged violations of the constitutional right to travel under the Article IV Privileges and Immunities Clause and the Commerce Clause, due process and equal protection guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizure, and the Eight Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment. The court ruled on a motion to dismiss on March 30th, 2007. The City of Gretna sought dismissal under Federal Rule of Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a federal claim.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The violation of the rights resulted in injury below is a summary of the case and how there was negligence on the defendants’ behalf. Kelly B. Niles was playing softball on a school playground in a recreation program which was operated…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    My client Phelps should not be charged because of the 1st Amendment which guarantees freedom of speech. The charges of defamation against Phelps should be dropped because it goes against his free speech. Snyder claimed that Phelps disturbed the peace of the funeral and has charged my client. My client did infact use obscenities and fighting words, but he was in a public form, and his statements were overall not directed at an individual. It cannot be considered hate speech because it was not threatening.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The title of the case is Short from Order. The case involves a tort case. It was decided in Supreme Court of the State of New York, and entered in November 16, 2017. Marie C. Almonor who is plaintiff brings the action against defendants Penske Truck Leasing and Santos Dlaz-Roman who the action are brought. The case talked about a motor vehicle accident happened in New York State.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    MOTION FOR INJUCTIVE RELIEF COMES NOW, the Defendant, Michael A. McNeil, and moves that this Court grants an injunctive relief to order the Plaintiff to stop permitting Mr. Gary Napier to transport the Defendant’s daughter around and outside of the state and to be alone with her without the presence of the Plaintiff in the mediate area. Additionally, the Defendant moves that the Plaintiff Sarah McNeil be ordered to no longer discuss the pending legal actions before this Court and/or making various pleadings available to be read by the Defendant’s daughter. In support of the Defendant’s motions he states the following: Concerning Mr. Gary Napier 1. Mr. Gary E. Napier is a 54 year old man that lives approximately 32 miles from the Plaintiff.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights Case Study

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Taking place in the year of 1954, during the first trial of Sheppard, one of the biggest economic booms of the time period was technology and its influence in society. Experimenting with this new idea many Americans was easily persuaded to one side or another in the case of Sheppard vs. Maxwell, causing controversy to his right to a fair, unbiased trial. This right is listed in the United States Constitution as the sixth of ten amendments; it writes that public word or media shouldn’t effect the case, and if this is likely to happen the case should be handled by a different court system away from public opinion. The controversy grew even more when Sheppard was convicted as guilty, and the injustice wasn’t corrected until Shepard was given a second chance by the Supreme Court after constant repeals and another trial took place in the year 1966. Under special circumstances the case was retried, to help fix the problem of the unfair, biased trial, but many people believe that he shouldn’t have been convicted in the first…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Source and Purpose of Civil Law Historically, civil law is derived from Rome’s Corpus Juris Civilis and France’s Code Napoleon (Emerson, 2009). It is founded on English common law. Notably, civil law systems are founded on legislative codes rather than judicial precedents. These codes are comprehensive and authoritative collections of rules that cover principal subjects of law. Currently, the main sources of civil law include academicians and legislative bodies.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dog Bite Statute

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court will reject the motion filed by the defendant to dismiss the claims of our client? BRIEF ANSWER: probably not. The defendant Mr Androcles’s motion to dismiss our client’s complaint may not succeed because all the elements envisaged in the ‘Dog bite statute’ are fulfilled. Firstly, the injury caused by the dog to Harvey in response to the throwing the snowball was severe and unproportional in nature. Secondly, there was no provocation as the response of the dog was not proportional or justifiable under ordinary discourse.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In United Kingdom and United States law and business, liquidation is the process by which a company (or part of a company) is brought to an end. And the assets and property of the company are redistributed. Liquidation is also sometimes referred to as winding-up or dissolution, although dissolution technically refers to the last stage of the liquidation. The process of liquidation also arises when customs, an authority or agency in a country responsible for collecting and safeguarding custom duties, determines the final computation or ascertainment of the duties or drawback accruing on the entry. Compulsory liquidation:the parties who are entitled by the law to petition for the compulsory liquidation of a company vary from jurisdiction to…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays