Garrett Hardin's Lifeboat Ethics: An Interminable Paradox

Improved Essays
Tragedy of the Commons: An Interminable Paradox
Essayist Garrett Hardin, in his paper, “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor”, argues that human beings are involved in a slowly increasing state of world devastation as they continue to misuse the world’s resources and, consequently, refuse to provide the adequate resources in return for their plundering. Hardin’s purpose is to educate the intellectual public of this matter so that measures might be taken and unreasonable solutions disposed of. He adopts an informative and serious tone in order to covey the urgency of the matter; additionally, he speaks practically and intellectually in order to appeal to his academic audience.
Hardin centers his prophetic analysis in the section titled “The Tragedy of the Commons”. It is evident through his eloquent and thought-provoking writing that Hardin addresses his analysis to an educated group, and particularly to those of a scientific and agricultural predisposition. As a section introduction, Hardin compares the world to a pasture. Succeeding this comparison is the author’s analysis of the public’s treatment of the pasture: everybody requires something of the pasture, but not everyone is willing to provide the resources necessary to upkeep it. Referred to as the commons, Hardin argues that this
…show more content…
Hardin attempts to provide a thought-provoking solution to the supposed issue of the time, world overpopulation, and he does so with intellect and an admirable understanding of his relationship with the audience. Through possession of an informative and serious tone, Hardin effectively conveys his ideas for supporting the world’s ever-growing population, and his predispositions to the ultimately fallible morality of man in the world’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Tragedy of the Commons: The Lorax meets the Dakota Access Pipeline The tragedy of the commons is an economic problem popularized by Garrett Hardin in the late 1960s. This widely accepted theory states that “every individual tries to reap the greatest benefit from a given resource. As the demand for the resource overwhelms the supply, every individual who consumes an additional unit directly harms others who can no longer enjoy the benefits.” (Investopedia)…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life Boat Ethics Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Garrett Hardin, the author of this essay, is trying to explain this topic as survival of the fittest by saying that the wealthier countries and the people that…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sea Otters Pros And Cons

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “The Tragedy of the Commons" is a term used to describe what happens to common resources as a result of human greed. It was first coined in an article in Science in 1968 by Garrett Hardin. The commons dilemma was seen long before Hardin, but he brought widespread attention to it and described it in a common-sense fashion that made it easily accessible.” For instance, “at its core, the Tragedy of the Commons demonstrates that, in a situation where the consequences of a course of action are shared among a collective, while the benefits are reaped by an individual or single group within the collective, people will tend to take actions that in the long term are detrimental to the group as a whole. This is a tragedy because, in seeking their own personal gain, the members of the group actually ultimately hurt themselves…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout the essay, Hardin relates overpopulation and tragedy of the commons to the Lifeboat analogy-thus Lifeboat ethics should be used. (Main Argument) Singer’s essay is trying to convince that everyone should reduce suffering by any means necessary. He puts a great emphasis on helping those who are distant from us. Singer links this case back to the analogy of the drowning child, he argues that if there are a lot of people surrounding the drawing child and no one is helping him out-…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In defense of the survivors’ guilt arising from not helping the poor, he claimed that “the net result of conscience-stricken people giving up their unjustly held seats is the elimination of that sort of conscience from the lifeboat”. He defined guilty about one’s good luck as a type of conscience and the newcomer’s lack of guilt about the rich people’s loss as conscience drain; but the author deliberately omitted the morality of rich people’s indifference to the poor asking for help. Counting the negative effects on total conscience in the lifeboat if no rescue is attempted, the final solution to the lifeboat dilemma might be changed. Essentially, the author’s negligence of social injustice against impoverished people and the ethical issue indifference is just a result of his bias for the rich countries.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Through examples from lecture and the article, I will review how this is a beneficial article to understand. Hardin goes into detail about how with every country having a different population causes for unequal resources needed. In the article it discusses the options that could be used to help countries where there is overpopulation and hopefully stop the hunger of many people. This is done through the discussion of The World Food Bank and a number of programs for improving agriculture in hungry nations called “Green Revolution”.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garret Hardin in his article “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, is attempting to show that we should not give money or resources to poor countries. Hardin recognizes that two-thirds of the world’s nations are poor and one-third of the nations are rich, with the U.S. being the richest. By recognizing this, he understands that there is some moral luck involved depending on if your rich or poor. However, he believes that giving to the poor is a destructive and terrible idea. He uses the analogy of a lifeboat to show that giving to the poor is a bad idea.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction: In the article “Living on a Lifeboat,” Garrett Hardin believes that our obligations to the poor and hungry are metaphors based on the ethics of living on a lifeboat and the tragedy of the common. The ethics of living on lifeboat is based upon the rich and the poor. Rich people are in the lifeboat and poor people are in the sea. The wealthy has only three options in the situation with the poor people.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead he’s advocating that more can be done to help people in poorer countries. He gives an example of how a lot more money is spent of questionable things such as the Anglo-French Concorde project which was projected to cost £440,000,000, while Britain to that date, had only given £14,750,000 to the East Bengal refugees. In addition, Hardin’s argument doesn’t prove that Singer is wrong because Singer accepts that giving and helping is important but controlling population growth is important as well. Singer says that “I accept that the earth cannot support indefinitely a population rising at the present rate… The conclusion that should be drawn is that the best means of preventing famine, in the long run, is population control”.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1) By a “commons”, Hardin refers to a shared resource, such as public land, National Parks, and the seas. One of Hardin’s most prominent example refers to herdsmen on commonly-shared land. Each herdsman will attempt to raise as much cattle as possible, Hardin argues, on the land. However, the land can only sustain a certain number of cattle. The tragedy occurs when each herdsman continues to add more and more cattle, in order to maximize their profit, without thinking about the negative consequences adding more cattle to the land will have.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The prominent philosopher Thomas Malthus addressed sustaining our resources in his essay, An Essay on the Principle of Population. Malthus proposed that human population would grow faster than our resources; our resources are limited and, therefore, we cannot sustain the population. Malthus himself writes, “to meet the needs and aspirations of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (552). Basically, Malthus is warning us that we need to find a way to control overpopulation, so we have enough resources for the future…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Space exploration is a vital part to how the world is today. People believe that it is just a waste of money, but in truth it could save the entire human race in the future. Without space exploration, we will overpopulate the earth. The earth does not have enough space for the rate of people being born. Also with overpopulation, means that we will also use up all of our natural resources.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction Throughout two scholarly articles written by William Freudenburg and Garrett Hardin, both authors seek to present their arguments about controversial topics. Within Garrett Hardin’s Tragedy of the Commons, Hardin focuses his attention on overpopulation. Hardin attempts to weight possible options to address this issue and their likelihood of impact throughout today's society. In William Freudenburg’s Pollutor Shell Game, Freudenburg seeks to address the necessity to change the way people view economy and the environment.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction The Earth is composed of various environmental resources. Often times, these natural resources can be used extensively by groups of people (Wang, Du, Su, Chen, 2012). This was portrayed in the movie DamNation (2014), in which dams were built to utilize the environmental resource of water, as a way to benefit humans. However, if individuals continuously overuse these natural resources for their self-interest, without its protection, the resources will eventually become damaged or depleted (Hardin, 1968).…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deciding how to interact and improve the world through ethics and moral reasoning is an ongoing contentious debate that has lasted for thousands of years. Two of the largest moral theories to develop in the twentieth century, that try to deal with the world around us, is environmentalism and animal liberation. Environmentalism is best summarized as the moral principle that biotic communities and the relationships within those communities are of the utmost importance to preserve. Animal Liberation represents the belief that sentience of a being qualifies that individual for moral consideration. If Leopold’s maxim is followed as the standard for land ethicism and the “when” in his maxim is read as a necessary condition then animal liberation…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays