Garcia V. City Of Antonio Case Summary

Great Essays
Garcia v. City of Antonio The issue on whether compensation and overtime pay is applicable to excluded and non-excluded security personnel is a major issue across various states. Even though the Fair Labor Standards Act provides direction regarding this issue, it remains to be a major concern that has attracted huge attention throughout various states. The U.S. Supreme Court and Congress have been forced to make several landmark decisions regarding whether compensation and overtime pay is relevant to exempt and nonexempt security workers. An example of such decisions is in the Supreme Court’s ruling on Garcia v. City of San Antonio case. However, the determination of the issue requires an analysis of such decisions as well as the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Analysis of the Case
…show more content…
City of San Antonio is a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Congress has the authority to expand the Fair Labor Standards Act that mandates employers to provide minimum wage and overtime to their workers as well as state and local governments. The Congress has these powers based on the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. While highlighting the significance of the political process as a protection against infringements upon the sovereignty of states, the Supreme Court ruled that municipal transit employees were not exempt from coverage under certain provisions of FLSA, particularly the minimum wage and maximum hour provisions (Young & Gardiner, 1986, p.599). As a result, the Supreme Court overruled a former decision in Supreme Court in the National League of Cities v. Usery case. The previous decision ruled that regulation of such state and local governments’ activities in conventional areas of governmental functions would be tantamount to breach of the 10th Amendment to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Anna Garcia Case Analysis

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Anna Garcia had an autopsy performed by Dr. King on August 15, 2012 at 11:00 AM. She was a 38 year-old female Hispanic who weighed 165 pounds and was 64 inches tall at the time of the autopsy. Anna Garcia’s autopsy is due to her sudden and unexpected death. Suspects for her death are Alex Garcia, Doug Greene, Erica Piedmont, and Lucy Leffingwell.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    SCOTT V. CARPANZANO United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, 556 Fed. Appx 288 (2014) FACTS: Rick Scott deposited $2 million in an escrow account into Salvatore Carpanzano’s company. Because of his violation of the escrow agreement, his funds were withdrawn. Scott was not able to recover his money so filed a suit Salvatore Carpanzano, which included his daughter Carmela Carpanzano. Scott did not make any allegations on Carmela’s part.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    • There are 5 Ps. P Edwin Santiago alleges assault, mace, and false arrest. P Santiago states that he had attended a block party earlier in the day and was preparing to go back to the block party when MOS entered his residence and maced him. P Santiago claims that he, Jose Melendez (named plaintiff) and Leslie Melendez (named plaintiff) retreated into the apartment. P Santiago claims that he went to the kitchen to wash his eyes and the front door slammed open and MOS entered the apartment and slammed P Jose Melendez against a fridge.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Over 3000 workers claimed that they were paid only for the time they were at their work stations and the production line was moving. c. The employee argued that the company violated the Employment Standards Act of 1938 and Iowa Wage Payment Collection law by not…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    FACTS: Petitioner was charged in Florida with breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor; this offense is a felony in Florida. The petitioner asked the trial court to appoint counsel, but the court denied the request. The petitioner was found guilty and sentenced to 5 years in prison. The petitioner then filed in the Florida Supreme Court for habeas corpus arguing that the refusal of the trial court to appoint counsel denied him of constitutional rights, but was denied the relief. The case before the U.S. Supreme Court is a Writ of Certiorari.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court holds Slim Workman’s Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment was violated.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the case of US vs. Gonzalez-Lopez lies many facts within the case. Some of the reliable facts is that a man named Cuauhtemoc Gonzalez-Lopez was charged with conspiracy to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. His family hired him an attorney by the name of John Fahle to represent him but Lopez had another person in mind. Lopez went ahead and hired attorney Joseph Low to represent him in the hopes of including him with Fahle or instead of. As time went on both attorneys represented Lopez but the Magistrate Judge only accepted Low’s provisional entry of appearance and allowed him to participate only if he immediately file a motion for admission pro hac vice.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is there a Constitutional right to burning the American Flag? Does the First Amendment give permission to destroy a pronounced symbol into ash? In the Texas vs. Johnson case, 1984, Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag in a protest at the Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas . While Texas argued it as a criminal offense, the Supreme Court argued, along with the First Amendment, that even though the proper treatment of the flag is encouraged, the action could be portrayed as a freedom of speech. So, does a state have a right to uphold it’s own laws, even if they don’t align with the federal law?…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    "United Steelworkers vs. Weber: Affirmative Action on Trial." Southern Changes 1979 ser. 1.9. Web. Voeten, Erik. "How the Supreme Court Responds to Public Opinion."…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arbitration Case Study

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Supreme Court's Gardner-Denver decision: a. resulted in trial courts overturning discrimination grievances heard by the arbitrators. b. contended that the arbitrator’s expertise pertains to labor agreement interpretation and not to resolving federal civil rights laws. c. applies only to "reverse-discrimination" grievances (white employees having more seniority who are denied a promotion filled by a minority employee, for example). d. all of these e. none of…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glimer Case Study

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Glimer, there was some ambiguity about the effect of the statutory exclusion for contracts of employment because, the arbitration clause was not in a contract between an employee and an employer, but rather was in a contract between an employee and the agency. The Supreme Court clarified the ambiguity in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, where the Court interpreted the exemption for “contracts of employment” exceptionally narrowly. The Court held that the statute applied to all contracts of employment except those involving workers who, like seamen and railroad workers, were engaged in transportation that crossed state lines. . Therefore, it is now clear that the FAA allows enforcement of agreements mandating arbitration of employment…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Imagine a university professor accuses a student of cheating on a final exam. Before the student can defend herself, the university decides to expel the student. Understandably, the student decides she wants to challenge the expulsion as a violation of her due process rights. Can the student challenge the action?…

    • 1298 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137, 122 S. Ct. 1275, 152 L.Ed.2d 271 (2002), Mr. Castro was fired for his organizing activities, which he was unlawfully terminated (“Undocumented Workers”., n.d.). “The National Labor Relations Board, the agency that administers the NLRA, ordered the employer to cease and desist, to post a notice that it had violated the law and to reinstate Mr. Castro, and to provide him with back pay for the time he was not working because he had been illegally fired (“Undocumented Workers”. , n.d., p. 5.) .”…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Point out which changes are occurring in the business that affect HRM. The external factors due to change in the company revenue which will increase in the next three years due to the up economy affect, with this happening the company will be extremely busy. The company has a total of ten employees that handles the HR functions, in three years five of them will be retiring, leaving only five that are of diverse ages to handle major changes.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays