Like in case of Diamond gang, initially constructed in common interests for music, after the accidental murder of one of its members the group has been transformed into a violent gang, …show more content…
Because, his need in the gang, such as level of income, won 't be dismanted. If those members of former gang will not find easily a convenient place to belong, they might decide to construct the new gangs, and become a leader, due to their gained experience, like in case of “older guys” ( Padilla, 2006). In such a case, the violence will in contrary grow, but not diminuish. Same way, as the decision to to “throw the book” at any gang member caught in possession of drugs, will not resolve the problem of the others gangs violence and their will to gain over the new territories, and to destroy the exsistent …show more content…
Klein et al. (1991) concluded after doing their reserch that “the world of crack in Los Angeles belonged principally to the regular drug dealers, not to street gangs.” Subsequently, the growing violence will be the sourse of inter drug dealers conflicts, and not the one of the street gangs.
(Padilla_2006) admitted in his reserch that there are some young men who simply establish drug-dealing network or grew comprised of several members, but these are not gang”. (P1)
The problem reside into the grouth of gang, “once gangs reach their highest stage of development, they come to resemble not just “crime that is organized” but also something altogether more sinister and difficult to deter: organized crime.” (Densley, 2014)
q.e.d. ("that which was to be demonstrated") that the violence spread is not forcely related to the gang drug activities, but also due to the growth of experience and notoriety of the organization. Also, changes occured due to the incoming exteriour violence, may influence the group to develop violence in order to protect their lives and interests.