Friction Lab

Decent Essays
From the percent difference I can conclude that neither surface area, surface texture, nor mass of block has that big of an impacted on the friction. The higher the percent difference is the more effect friction would have on it, with the lower percent difference says it wouldn’t affect friction. For surface area testing side A against side B on smooth sliding for percent difference was60.78%, over half (50%) but not by much. For weight off sandpaper the difference was only 40.00%, where on sandpaper it went up to 45.71%. Still less than half meaning it does not have much effect on the level of friction on the block of wood.

Conclusion:
In conclusion this lab it did meet the purpose, as it was discovered that surface area (due to the percent difference) affect levels of friction more than surface texture and weight. Sources of error for this lab are inaccurate measuring as the scale went up by two so it was more of a guess what number it was pointing too. A way to fix this is to get a motion sensor. A second source of error was that it was hard to get a constant velocity on the sandpaper as the block kept getting caught on little pieces sticking up. A way to improve this is to use another
…show more content…
As to recap the start friction should have been bigger then the slide friction (which it wasn’t), but after research on matters of friction it said that surface area shouldn’t affect friction levels (to a certain amount) and surface texture and weight should be the main factors affecting friction. It makes since for a heavier object should be harder to push, making it have a higher friction than a lighter object. Surface texture has the most effect on friction as done between a table and sandpaper, the table has nothing to stop the block from sliding. Yet on the sandpaper there are many “bumps” grabbing the block, trying to hold it back this makes the friction great as it is trying to dislodge the “spikes” in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gummy Bear Experiment

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For our diffusion experiment our group decided to work with salt water and gummy bears. Our experiment tested the weight of the gummy bears per salt dilutions. Our tests included 1g 2.5g 5g, 1.5g, and 10g of salt diluted with water. We knew that the higher the concentration of salt diluted into the water the heavier the diffused gummy bear would be, therefore we measure weight as our numerical data. My hypothesis was that the 10g dilution of salt would have the gummy bear with the largest mass.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Penny Lab

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduction: For this lab, the two main topics are surface tension and pennies. Pennies are a part of the US currency, which holds a value of one cent. They were mostly made by copper until 1982 when the government realized the expenses of using copper; thus, the composition was changed to 97.5% zinc and 2.5% copper or copper plated zinc. It has a diameter of 19.05 mm and a thickness of 1.52 mm and is forged using four procedures: Blanking, Annealing, Upsetting, and Striking. The design of the penny holds two alternative sides (heads or tails) which has a picture of Abraham Lincoln engraved on one end and a variety of pictures engraved on the other end (usually the white house).…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bennet Clark Analysis

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This law is when a force is being put on an object but it isn't balanced nor equal. When Bennett pushes off the block he is no longer at rest therefore unbalanced forces are acting upon him. Bennett is the object and his mass compared to the block’s mass causes his acceleration to happen when he pushes off the block and into the air. There is also a friction force when he is positioning his feet on the block to move his feet kinetic friction is in action.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paper Towel Lab

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The question is, “Which paper towel brand is the most absorbent?” The hypothesis is, “If a dropper drops water equally on a paper towel of each brand until it started to drip, then Bounty brand would contain the most water, in grams. The independent variable is the brands of paper towels. The dependent variable is the grams of water that was contained in the paper towel. The control variable was that every paper towel sheet was cut to be 15.2 centimeters by 28.1 centimeters.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Paper Towel Lab Report

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this unit of my 9th grade Physical Science, we are learning and experiencing with labs. In this week's experiment, my class did the paper towel lab. Here, we tested the quality of three different paper towel brands, Viva, Up&Up, and Bounty. Each lab group was testing for a certain quality of each brand, such as strength and absorbency. Through different experiments, each lab group came to the conclusion that one paper towel brand had more strength or better absorbency than the other two.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For this lab there were two debriefs, in these debriefs we, as a class, discussed the topic of surface tension, meniscus, and how they affected our experiment. The meniscus, also stated before, gave the students a measuring problem in the beginning, when filling up the graduated cylinder to 100 mL. In Lab Debrief Part One, we discussed this situation and later found out that the meniscus was a curve of the liquid and could be either convex or concave. An observation in the experiment was when the pennies were displacing both water and milk, which created convex meniscus; this was the effect of surface tension. Surface tension was a large aspect of our experiment because this was what made more pennies fit into the water rather than the milk. Surface tension is defined as the cohesive force between particles which ties them together, and creates an elastic bubble on top of the graduated cylinder.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beaker Experiment

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fill the flat beaker with water. 6. Place a plastic bag over the top of the cylinder and place it, upside down, in the flat beaker. Make sure the bottom of the beaker is always underwater. 7.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To summarize my data that I got was mostly in the 300-400 ´s. Also you can tell that the M&M did not make such of a difference so that was a bummer. This is because my hypothesis was that the M&M would do a difference and probably weigh down the rocket. I think our accuracy was off because the M&M did not do to much for us. Finally my question is why did the M&M not do anything with the paper…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sugar Cube Lab

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Pages

    James Beehn Feb 27/ 2017 Sugar Cube Lab The lab was to use sugar cubes and put them in a jar and shake it up and down. That was to show erosion and how erosion works. The hypotheses for this lab was for the sugar cubes to break into small pieces when you are shaking the jar up and down.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Water Erosion Outline

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Water erosion Water erosion is a natural force that is caused by things like water, ice and wind. This can also happen by human activity. It wears out rocks and soil. Water erosion occurs on streams,rivers banks, sea shores and seaside cliffs. Usually muddy water is a sign of erosion.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Snow Globe Essay

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is because the object is increasing its speed due to the force of the gravity which is pulling the object down…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This way is increasing or decreasing force. The first trial with 6 newtons accelerated the 2.27 kilogram Lenny Board to 1.04 m/sec2, then on the second trial 8 newtons accelerated the Lenny Board(same mass)to 1.77 m/sec2. Then the final trial with the same mass and 10 newtons accelerated the Lenny Board to 2.30 m/sec2. The slope of my or any speed vs. time graph tells acceleration. This is because speed is on the Y axis and time is on the X axis so you could think of it as speed/time which equals acceleration.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discussion From this experiment, it can be determined that the value of the coefficient of friction between the wire and the belt is 0.2782 (which is dimensionless). In addition, T1 becomes smaller (so the belt tension ratio becomes greater) when the angle of contact is increased, which can be explained by considering equation 2, as T2 cannot change for a given stationary mass. Comparing the experimental results to the theoretical predictions (made from the calculated value of μ, there is a relatively good agreement, especially when neglecting the πc result. The slightly higher gradient of the experimental results is likely due to an error (systematic) in the calibration of the load cell, causing it to become more inaccurate at higher tensions.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The influence of EP parameters on the surface roughness is using main effect plot as shown in Fig.2. The surface roughness decrease with increase in temp. When time increase from 9 min to 12 min there is decrease in surface roughness but from 12 min to 15 min there is no change in surface roughness. In third case, when current density increase from 0.0054 A/mm2 to 0.0058 A/mm2 , there is decrease in surface roughness but from 0.0058 A/mm2 to 0.0062 A/mm2 again surface roughness will be…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shear Stress Lab Report

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The frictional coefficient (μ) varies and depends on the types of material used. For the lab, we conducted four different experiments. Three of the materials (paper, plastic film, & sand paper) used had different frictional coefficient (μ) values and the forth experiement was a repetition of one of the three materials previously used. We observed that among the three materials used, the sand paper has a higher coefficient of friction than the two remaining materials. This is true because sand paper was the roughest material of all the three types of material we used in this specific experiment.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays