Freud And Erikson Stages

These theories review the different areas of psychological development by different stages that explain the same processes. Within each stage a number of areas conflicts present time with Fraud, Erikson, and Piaget’s time, showing the different interactions of the developmental process that occurs. These stages are also similar in the fact that they are all successful, and when one stage failed with one of these physiologists and there theory’s, the next psychologist learned from it and built a better theory. All three of these psychologists expanded on the ideas of development in person’s life expectance with the learning process that goes with their development. These different theories show the effect on both society and personal development with individuals. This mostly habited during childhood where the child is getting their education and learning a lot. With this being …show more content…
What makes each theory different was how they were viewed. For example Piaget’s theory, wasn’t meant for going through stage by stage but reviewing the individual within a certain time period and evaluating their progress. Then when it comes to Eriksson’s theory he reviewed an individual going through all his stages and really had a lot of similarity to Freud’s stages. On the other hand, passing through all the stages was essential in Erickson’s theory.
Over time we have studied and overseen the modern work of these psychologists and how they contributed to the understand of human development and how It can be overlooked. There were many similarities and many differences but this gave the public the option of seeing different areas of development. We virtually overviewed how the psychologists came up with their theories with similarities and differences with their theories that were based on environmental, social, and physical