Foner notes in his book, “ There is nothing unusual or sinister in the fact that each generation rewrites history to suit its own needs, or about disagreements within the profession and among the public at large about how history should best be taught and studied”. This furthermore enhances the idea that one country, group, museum or person will display history as to what they see as important and unnecessary. This is a perfect example of why we should study history because without knowing the full scenario, we tend to believe one side of the argument is better than the other when in reality, we are only given a portion of the truth. Foner then continues, “ Of course, there is nothing intrinsically wrong with young people either developing from history a sense of identity or taking pride in their nation's accomplishments. But when history locates supposedly primordial characteristics shared with members one’s own group and no one else, it negates the interpenetration of cultures that is so much a part of our nation’s past”.…