Fourth Amendment Drug Testing

Improved Essays
Is drug testing of students who participate in extracurricular activities permitted under the fourth amendment?

fourth amendment states that a person has the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Meaning that the people are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government while it does not guarantee against all searches and seizures, only those the law deems unreasonable. Which is determined by the balance of two important interests being
…show more content…
My answer to that question is yes, the search falls under public safety. Seeing as drug use is against all school rules and is a matter of public safety, drug testing is permitted under the fourth amendment. Participation in extracurricular activities is a privilege by meeting and maintain a minimum grade point average to play sports, as well as following the rules set by the school one being no drug usage.

When taken to court The Supreme Court claimed that as long as there is reasonable grounds for suspecting that evidence will turn up during a search proving that the student has violated or is violating either the law or the rules of the school. Allowing for School officials searching a student who is under their authority without obtaining a warrant.

The case of New Jersey v. TLO (1985) being an example of the search without warrant. A young lady who was a student at a public high school was caught smoking on school premises, leading to the school performing a search of her personal belongings. She was charged for the dealing and ownership of the drugs found in the search. After the Supreme Court deemed it to be a reasonable search, because the school officials had a reasonable suspicion being the cigarettes to perform said

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    . The court ruled that the warrantless search of the dormitory room by the campus police violated the defendant's constitutional rights and that all evidence obtained as a result of the search should be suppressed in the case Commonwealth v. Eric W. Neilson, 423 Mass 75 (1996). College officials searched the room because they had reason to believe that there was an animal inside the room, which is against school policies. When they got in the room they proceeded to look in the closet; there they found a marijuana plant. The college officials immediately called the police and when they arrived they took pictures of the plant for evidence, and then with the help of the college officials, removed it from the room.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1984 case of New Jersey v T.L.O., a fourteen year old freshman student’s attorney argues that evidence collected by school officials should be excluded due to a violation of the student’s Fourth Amendment rights to unreasonable search and seizure. The student and her friend were caught smoking cigarettes in the restroom of the high school by a teacher, and escorted to the principal’s office. After claiming that she was not a smoker, the principal demanded that she reveal the contents of her purse. Upon opening the purse, the principal found not only cigarettes; but, marijuana, drug paraphernalia, a substantial amount of money, and a list of other students that owed her money.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore there was not any probable cause or reasonable suspicion for the search of the cell phone. The contents of the bag, including a vaseline jar and a sandwich wrapper, do not give reasonable grounds for the search of the phone. If Sanders and Turpin found no marijuana on L.O.L. and sent him back to class, what was the purpose of keeping his cell phone as there was no reasonable suspicion and probable cause. Similarly in the case G.C. v. Owensboro Public Schools (2013), the Sixth circuit had ruled against the school’s search of the student’s cell phone.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Supreme Court's decision in New Verses versus T.L.O was that the search was legal and that it didn't violate the 4th amendment. The Court also held that school officials need "responsible suspicion" instead of a higher level of "probable cause" and that such a warrant wasn't needed. There should be "responsible suspicion" since students still have some rights at schools, and without a "responsible suspicion", the school officials would be breaking the Fourth Amendment. Yes, the Supreme Court's decision was the correct one because students should have some rights when at school, but if associated with what could lead to a bigger consequence or investigation, the school officials should be able to search and do what they can without a warrant…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vernonia v. Acton Does drug testing violate the fourth amendment rights of students? In 1995, Vernonia v. Acton sought to answer that question. This case was brought to the Supreme Court, and the Court ruled in favor of the Vernonia School District. Since then, drug testing has been widely used throughout the nation. Vernonia v. Acton is a landmark court case; therefore, it is important to understand the history, background, constitutional issues, and the current impact of the case.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    T. L. O. Case Study

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1980, New Jersey filed charges against T.L.O. in juvenile court after T.L.O.'s assistant vice principal searched her purse and found cigarettes, rolling paper, that led him to suspect marijuana usage after she had denied any accusations. T.L.O. moved to suppress the results of the search violated the 4th Amendment, and the juvenile court denied the motion suppress. They had an idea that she might have been selling drugs. T.L.O. was then suspended and that is when the case was set in motion.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The exclusionary rule became very specific as to what was excluded and what wasn’t overtime due to certain cases. In Katz v. United States, 1967 abstract items were protected from unreasonable searches and seizures and found objects like waste and garbage are not applied in the fourth amendment (California v. Greenwood, 1988) The biggest concern after this was whether or not this clause also apply to students. Two students in Middlesex County,New Jersey were at their high school and were caught smoking in the restroom by a teacher. T.L.O. (Tracy Lois Odem) and the other student were taken to the principal’s office.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    T. L. O. Case Essay

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    T.L.O. may have had illegal items in her possession, but the search conducted by the school was unlawful, unreasonable, and violated two Amendments in the Constitution of the United States of America. T.L.O. suffered many charges pressed against her in the lower level courts, so she has now been brought to The Supreme Court’s attention. T.L.O. was first discovered smoking in a school lavatory along with an acquaintance by a teacher. Her accomplice admitted to smoking but T.L.O. denied it. She was brought…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mapp Exclusionary Rule

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If a police officer suspected a criminal of violating the law, the officer had the right to search the suspect without any warrant. Moreover, Mapp v. Ohio limited what police can do to a citizen. For example, a police can’t search another person without any “reasonable suspicion” or “probable cause”. Furthermore, Chief Justice Warren introduced a new rule: inevitable discovery rule.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since in this case the circumstance is all an interpretation, it is later disputed in the court as to whether a warrant should have been issued. Another example of when you do not need a warrant is the plain view doctrine. This state anything in plain view of an officer my be seized without a search warrant. The court case Arizona v. Hicks, is a perfect example of how the plain view doctrine is used. In this case, police officers investigated a shooting in Hicks apartment.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most commonly known amendments are those that are considered part of the Bill of Rights. However, one of the most important amendment that every citizen should know is the Fourth Amendment. This Amendment is broken in three parts that imply that people should have the right to be secure in and of their property, no warrants should be issued without any unreasonable cause and that if there is a warrant, then they should specify the place and people of search. Many citizens do not completely understand this amendment to the extent to exercise this right.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure In the Fourth Amendment, it states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated” (Cornell University of Law). The Fourth Amendment states its main idea in this statement and through it American citizens and their belongings and records are protected from surveillance, searches, and seizures. However, in today’s digital world government officials have used what could be called an unconstitutional approach to the Fourth Amendment, causing them to monitor phone conversations. There have also been instances where personal records have been gained by law enforcement without any relevant reason.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment grants property rights to citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures. Consent is one of the most frequently used exceptions to the Fourth Amendment. Determining if a person has the authority to grant consent is an issue unique to computers. Today, technology enables multiple users to log on to a computer using multiple passwords and profiles and create multiple accounts and screen names. A password is analogous to a key that can be used to open a locked container.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The amendment I chose is the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment is “Citizens cannot be forced to subject themselves to seizure and search without a search warrant and probable cause”. The Fourth Amendment was included to the Constitution so that police do not have the power to just look through your things and they can’t take anything if they do not have permission, a warrant, from a judge. You must also show that you have a good reason to be able to get the warrant.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays