Four Types Of Relativism

Improved Essays
The world would be terribly boring if we all agreed on the same things. What is considered to be right and wrong merely depends on society and cultural beliefs. With that being said, what may be correct in the moral aspect for one, may be totally despicable for another individual. This way of thinking correlates to relativism. There are several different types of relativism. Cultural relativism, descriptive ethical relativism, and normative relativism. There are many situations in which relativism and descriptive relativism, and normative relativism come into play. Some of the most popular topics for discussion concerning any type of relativism are mutilation of genitals, and which foods can and cannot be eaten, and how one should carry …show more content…
Like stated before, abortion is something that could fall into normative ethical relativism, because there is no answer whether abortion is morally right or wrong. Something like this is only dependent upon personal values, usually developed with the help of society. In conclusion, there is no objective right, or wrong. Relativism is why people will never agree on what is right or wrong. Relativism is multifaceted. Cultural Relativism is related to the morals followed and created because of the culture in which one is raised in. Descriptive Ethical Relativism is almost just like Cultural Relativism, but it has to do with things that are tolerated in one country that would not be tolerated in a different country. Lastly, Normative Relativism just ties in the fact that there is no quote on quote, right or wrong due to cultural and societal differences.

Works Cited
O’Sullivan, Stephen and Philip A. Pecorino. “Ethics, An Online Textbook.” 2002. Web. August 10, 2015.
David Wong. “Online Guide to Ethics and Moral Philosophy.” Version 1.0. caee.phil.cmu.edu/. 2002. Web. August 10,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Subsequently, if a person or culture deems that murder or slavery is morally correct, ethical relativism holds that the actions are morally correct. Further, if one believes that ethical relativism is morally correct and another believes that it is incorrect,…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism has been looked at from several different angles by many different people. Louis P. Pojman is one person that has not only questioned, but rejected the concept. Pojman’s argument stands on four objections. His protests are that ethical relativism leads to ridiculous outcomes, gives way to subjectivism, is logically inconsistent, and provides no rational method to resolve conflicts within and between cultures. Pojman theorized that, if the world were to go by ethical relativism, one could no longer make judgements against any society, including their own, because no external or objective truth exists.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Walter Terance Stace is an empirical philosopher who wrote the article, “Ethics Are Not Relative”, which asserts that “there is no single universal objective standard.” He presents us with two sides, that of the Ethical Relativist (left) vs. that of the Ethical Absolutist (right). The absolutists argue in one true moral code, and that there are no exceptions to this moral code, regardless if it’s contrary to one’s beliefs. While the relativist argues that there are many moral laws, codes, standards. Relativists state that a moral value “is relative to the age, the place, and the circumstance in which it is found.”…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    discusses duty based theories versus consequential based theories. We did the Starving Seamen case write-up to analyze these theories of personal ethics. We found that the court acted on duty based ethics and the starving seamen acted on consequential based ethics. We also learned about the “Golden Rule” and Ethical Relativism. Chapter 3 discusses the legal system and jurisdiction of the courts.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Final Paper Assignment My purpose in this essay is to explain why I believe that morality is objective versus moral relativism, which ethical theory do I ratify and the reasons behind why I do, and express how I would respond to a stranger’s objection to that specific ethical theory. Theory of Morality, also known as theory of the right, is concerned with identifying fundamental moral norms, rules, or principles in which actions are evaluated and may be deemed as right or wrong. In other words, this is explaining what you ought or ought not to do. Moral relativism is to say that there are no moral truths.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Moral Quest Summary

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As humans we are governed by a code of ethics even though sometimes we fail to acknowledge it. It is this innate reasoning that allows us to decide which road we all take in life; this can be seen as us doing things that are ethical in nature. The word ethics as viewed from a Christian perspective as defined by Grenz is “the study of how humans ought to live as informed by the bible and Christian convictions.” It is with this definition that we seek to understand how human beings should operate. It also allows us to differentiate between ethics and morality.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1a. Cultural relativism is the view that no culture is superior to any other culture when comparing systems of morality, law, politics, etc. (AllAboutPhilosophy.org, n.d.) It does not offer a universal right and wrong, but rather offers the notion of morals based on the cultural environment. This diverges from the traditional ethical theories of doing what is right and adopts the ethical theories that are the “lay of the land” as they relate to the local culture in which the dilemma takes place.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Explanations of Morals (Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held) Morals (mor – als) Noun; plural 1. a lesson, especially one concerning what is right or prudent, that can be derived from a story, a piece of information or an experience. 2.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Food Shortage In Canada

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Introduction According to reports compiled by the Food and Agricultural Organisation (2014), it is projected that farmers throughout the globe produce enough to feed the world’s population in its entirety. Even so, this is hampered by wastage that occurs when the food is being harvested, when it is en route to processing plants, and when kept in storage facilities. Even more of it is thrown in the market by retailers, while the largest amount is disposed off in the form of leftover once the food gets to consumer’s plate (Bloom, 2010). In all these cases, people’s mindsets towards food preservation and the utilisation of inefficient practices are to blame.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Introduction to a Caucasian, Conservative, Catholic Woman’s Stance on Ethics: Three C’s and a W Altogether, I firmly believe that an individual’s ethical stance is the summation of that they have been exposed to throughout their lifetime. From childhood ideals reinforced as one ages, to the background that one comes from, to both the political and religious beliefs that one strongly clings to and passionately defends – these factors ultimately contribute to what an individual foresees as good and bad, as well as what is right and wrong. Therefore, throughout this short essay, my own ethical stance will be further explored and analyzed to demonstrate that not only do a multitude of factors affect one’s ethical stance but that one’s…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Philosophy 2306 Final Paper In The Elements of Moral Philosophy, James and Stuart Rachels discuss the ideas of ethics that a novice should challenge. This book consists of thirteen chapters. First, the author begins with the minimum conception of morality; the following three chapters cover cultural relativism and the connection between morality and religion; the middle chapters, five to twelve, focus on essential ethical theories; and the last chapter describes the author’s perspective of what a satisfactory moral theory should be like.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism And Culture

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The moral codes claim what is “right” and what is “wrong”. When it comes to cultural relativism, there is no universal truth, however, it does have a cultural code. There are six main points about the topic cultural relativism that may help an individual understand how cultural relativism plays a role into a…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism is the view that “some moral rules really are correct, and that these determine which moral claims are true and which false.”…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism is the belief that each culture defines their own morality and because of this we should not judge a cultures morality because one is not better than the other. Acceptance is a strength of relativism, because it could promote the idea that we are all different and we should all accept each other for who we are. Another of its strengths is allowing people to choose a moral code to live by and not be subjected to one way of thinking. However there are some downsides to relativism, for example promoting intolerance. Intolerance promoted due to the fact that if a culture is committing genocide relativists say that we are not allowed to judge them because that might just be a part of their culture.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays