Four Theories Of Punishment And Contributions In Criminal Law

Great Essays
PUNISHMENTS & SENTENCES AVAILABLE IN CRIMINAL LAW

INTRODUCTION
The following are elements of a crime: an act of commission or omission on the part of a human being has been provided by the laws set in a country to be harmful, the transgressions of such harmful acts are prevented by a threat or sanction of punishment administered by the state and the guilt of the accused is determined after the accusation against him has been investigated according to the legal proceedings as provided for the constitution.

There are four theories of punishment to support the use of punishment in society. They include Retribution, deterrence, prevention, reformation.
Retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished. Modern
…show more content…
Reformative Theory maintains that crime is a kind of disease and the criminal should be treated well so that he may be able to recover from this disease. Supporters of reformative theory opine that the government should adopt measures to remove bad conditions and hence prevent crime. It seeks to reform the offender by showing him the evil of his ways.

FORMS OF PUNISHMENT, SENTENCES
Age of Criminal Responsibility in Kenya is eight years old hence if a child less than eight years performs an act of omission which by law is defined as a crime he/she cannot be held responsible for the crime hence cannot be charged in a court for prosecution.
If a child aged between the age of eight and twelve commits a criminal offence then before prosecution the court must establish whether the child understood the consequences of his / her actions if not then the child will not be prosecuted but if they understood then the child will be prosecuted.

DEATH
Section 25 of the Penal code provides for death as one of the punishments which may
…show more content…
FORFEITURE
Section 29 (1) of the penal code provides that a person convicted of an offence under sections 118 in respect to obtaining property upon agreement that he will conceal a felony and 119 to the court may in addition order forfeiture of any property which has passed in connection with the commission of the offence.
Forfeiture is also provided for in the following statutes:
- Section 68 of the Forest Conservation and Management Act 2016 makes provisions for conviction of persons of an offence under these act in which the court may make an addition to any other ruling which include forfeiture of vessels, vehicles, tools used in commission of the offence.
- The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances whereby section 7 provides for forfeiture of land used for cultivation of prohibited land. Under section 19 provides for forfeiture of narcotic drugs found in possession of a person who has no legal authority, or is in excess of the quantity or quality is different from what he is authorized to have or in a place other than where it is authorized to be kept. Section also 20 provides for forfeiture whereby any machinery equipment used for the commission of an offence should be forfeited to the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In this essay I will discuss two approaches to punishment which are retributivism, also known as non-consequentialism, and utilitarianism, also known as consequentialism. I will then analyse three justifications of punishment within the utilitarian approach which are reform and rehabilitation, individual and general deterrence and incapacitation. Retributivism is a sociological perspective of crime which looks at the different forms and changes in punishment. It is a backward thinking approach as it does not look at future consequences of punishment and is mostly concerned with offences already committed and getting ‘justice’. This approach is considered similar to ‘an eye for an eye’ as it is based on the idea that if we inflict harm on another…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the modern legal system, most jurisdictions view a person as an adult at 18 years of age. Until a person reaches this age, they are less likely to receive the full extent of a jurisdiction’s legal system. At certain parts in a child’s life, age can be used as a valid defense. If a person is under 7 years of age, they will not be charged in most jurisdictions. From the age of 7 to the age of responsibility, which is usually recognized as 16 but varies by jurisdiction, an offender can be tried in the juvenile system (criminal Law Today).…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our criminal system has numerous felony cases depending on the crime that are committed. Mississippi has a law that allows property to be seized, and possibly forfeited, if it is assumed to have connection with a violation of controlled substances laws. To validate a forfeiture,” the State must essentially prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that an item of property was “used” or “intended to be used” in violation of the law. Some items of property subject to forfeiture are intuitive – drugs, drug containers, paraphernalia and items used to manufacture drugs are all routinely forfeited”. Under Mississippi’s civil forfeiture laws the government has to connect property to a crime by a multitude of evidence in order to forfeit it.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state and federal civil asset forfeiture laws, allows law enforcement agencies to keep or sell the assets and use the profits to subsidize their budgets. Different from criminal asset forfeiture, civil forfeiture, a property owner is not required to be found guilty of a crime or even charged to permanently…

    • 2228 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Forfeiture is the loss of property to the government because the property is believed to have been associated with criminal activity. Under this law, civilians are not required to be charged with a crime to have their personal belongings seized by the federal government because it is an in rem action, meaning the trial is against their possessions, not the civilian personally. The members of the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the United States House of Representatives should place restraints on 18 US Code § 981, commonly known as Civil Forfeiture, because it is an unconstitutional law that allows corrupt police officers to take advantage of innocent citizens, it has proven to be exceedingly expensive and difficult to regain possession…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people would agree that laws are something that were created to help people. Most of the help is figuring out who is right, how to handle something, or rules to follow (Behl, 2016). Hardly anyone would argue that this is a bad thing, until the law itself breaks the rules. Many laws can, in fact, contradict themselves. An example of this is the juvenile justice system and being able to wave the juvenile to adult court.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most citizens possible think it’s not right to fully charge a minor in court as an adult, When others think otherwise , Reason for is that citizens believe that it violates the Eighth Amendment where that would be categorized as cruel and unusual punishment. It is believed by many that a minor is human being that is known as a young , not fully matured , and just loves to have fun, which for the most part is true. For Example , A minor’s brain doesn’t fully develop till the age 25, so if you were to think about a 15 year old teenager, that committed a murder that an adult would possibly commit an then get charged full life sentence but, remember that he wasn’t possibly not in the right state of mind because of some kind of illness or just wasn’t raised by a good family or some unexpected tragedy that had happen in his life that had impacted him in a very emotional or life time tragedy that no one is aware of.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the article written by the CNN legal analyst, Phillip Halloway named ‘Should 11-year-olds be charged with adult crimes?’ on 14th October 2015, there has been an increase in the number of juvenile offenders who have been sentenced as adults. These are the issues presently plaguing the American legal system, as the brutal deeds of juvenile wrongdoers keep on to making headlines (Halloway, 2015). The primary question is, are children able to understand the consequences of their actions? Maybe, not as latest studies suggest that the brain 's prefrontal lobe, which some scientists study, performs an important role in slowing down improper behavior, may not attain full growth until age 20.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction “He who does not prevent a crime when he can, encourages it”, a quote from Lucius Annaeus Seneca that helps describe how society views and “prevents” crime. Criminal theories attempt to construct views on how to prevent and fight crime but often the criminal justice system is working against society. The two theories that are explained within are the social learning theory and rational choice theory. These theories will construct views as to how and why the seven crimes are committed using the concepts within the theories.…

    • 2208 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dylan Lankford English II 12/12/16 “Arkansas” LOTF Essay There are many instances of children killing other kids, adults, and even their own family members. A tough question that countries and states have to decide is when these children should be accountable for their crimes. The age varies from country to country, some allowing kids to be responsible for criminal actions at the age of 7 while others are much higher such as 16, or 18. In the article “Arkansas Boys Who 5 are sentenced” by Rick Bragg discusses an incident where two boys shot and killed 5 people.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Assessment of the Positive Impact of Classical Theory on the Legal System Through Promotion of Fairness and Improvement to the Existing Criminal Justice System Introduction Classical theory traces its origin to the mid years of the eighteenth century. Importantly, during this time, the uses of very severe and intense modes of punishment were common. This school of thought has its roots in Europe, as the region is well known to have used severe torture procedures to obtain confessions and secure testimonies that were self-incriminating. Highlighting the fundamental idea that classical theory is based on: that humans should be left to exercise their free will in making decisions and the modes of punishment used can deter crime given that their extent is proportional, implemented in a proper manner and fitting to the particular…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Punishment is determined based on the weight of the crime, or in reality, on the views of the people determining the weight of the crime. An accused can be sentenced to a lengthy jail time, a short jail time, or a death sentence. As America has progressed, crime has been carefully documented and categorized to help in determining a “fair and just” sentence. Jail Time Jail time is imposed to those convicted of lesser crimes.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Once balance is restored, the chances of the prisoner re-offending are diminished (Inayatullah, 2011). In contrast, there is the punishment model. Inayatullah (2011) states that the argument is that all the rights are given to the offender and the victim has none. Therefore in this approach, the best way to reduce present day and future crimes is to keep serious offenders in jail. Evidence shows that twenty-five percent of criminal activity can be reduced by lengthy prison sentences.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I will also be defending Jeremy Bentham’s position, and the utilitarian view of punishment. To begin, Immanuel Kant was a firm believer in the term retributivism.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The classical school of thought is based on the idea that people are free to make decisions, and that punishment can be a deterrent to crime, the punishment is proportionate, fits the crime, and are expeditiously. The theory that participates in the classical school of criminology is that "criminals make the rational choice and choose to commit criminal acts because of the maximum pleasure and minimum pain," (Classical, 2012). Theorist went further to explain that to discourage and lessen crime, and the severity of certain penalties must be proportionate to the crime committed and not more than what is necessary in order to deter the offender and others from committing more crimes (Classical, 2010). This theoretical framework and thought constitute the classical school of criminology.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays