Scientists are developing ways to edit the DNA of tomorrow’s children. In the short story “Flowers For Algernon”, by Daniel Keyes, there is an intellectually disabled man named Charlie Gordon that is also going to be operated on to promote his intelligence. As informed scientists are developing ways to edit the DNA of babies. That means that people are making their babies with requested traits: intelligence, eye color, athleticism, and disease prevention. They are known as designer babies. As informed, scientists are developing ways to edit the DNA of babies. That means that people are developing ways to edit the DNA of babies That means that people are making their babies with requested traits: intelligence, eye color, athleticism, and disease
…show more content…
Charlie was better before the operation. For example, Charlie’s job at the bakery, everyone thought he was funny. They admired Charile even though he wasn’t as productive as the other employees. Also, the text states, “I’m going back to work because I miss my job and all my friends and all the fun we have there.”This shows that Charlie has fun at his job because all of his friends are there. He was better before the operation. for instance,, the text states, “Before, they laughed at me and despised me for my ignorance and dullness; now, they hate me for my knowledge and understanding.” This shows that with the operation, he lost his job and his friends. Another example from the text is, “Now I’m more alone than ever…” It will be hard for Charlie to adapt to not having friends. This proves that his old friends are scared of him, and they don’t want him to be smarter than them. Again, Charlie was better before the operation. On page 39, it states, “Everybody around here’s been saying, ‘Charlie, it’s not right.’” That summarizes that he is how this will completely diverse that he was before the operation. In conclusion, Charlie Gordon should not have had the operation to promote his intelligence. It is dangerous to tamper with human nature because in the article “The Ethics of Chlidren to Order,” by Tia Ghose, it expresses, “There are
Charlie was better before the operation. For example, Charlie’s job at the bakery, everyone thought he was funny. They admired Charile even though he wasn’t as productive as the other employees. Also, the text states, “I’m going back to work because I miss my job and all my friends and all the fun we have there.”This shows that Charlie has fun at his job because all of his friends are there. He was better before the operation. for instance,, the text states, “Before, they laughed at me and despised me for my ignorance and dullness; now, they hate me for my knowledge and understanding.” This shows that with the operation, he lost his job and his friends. Another example from the text is, “Now I’m more alone than ever…” It will be hard for Charlie to adapt to not having friends. This proves that his old friends are scared of him, and they don’t want him to be smarter than them. Again, Charlie was better before the operation. On page 39, it states, “Everybody around here’s been saying, ‘Charlie, it’s not right.’” That summarizes that he is how this will completely diverse that he was before the operation. In conclusion, Charlie Gordon should not have had the operation to promote his intelligence. It is dangerous to tamper with human nature because in the article “The Ethics of Chlidren to Order,” by Tia Ghose, it expresses, “There are