Flaws Of The Nuremberg Trials

Great Essays
The Nuremberg Trials
Justice is an elusive thing in the world and it is usually undermined by those in power. Consistently in history the victor is the one who determines their own justice. However, after WWII the allied powers of the United Kingdom, United States of America and the Soviet Union set a precedent for convicting war criminals and the means of doing so. The Nuremberg trials sought to bring credible justice, not just victor's justice, to the men responsible for the atrocities committed against humanity during the Holocaust. Twenty-four of the most prominent Nazi figures, who were still alive, were put on trial for various war crimes and crimes against humanity. Though the
…show more content…
A few years from now the lawyers of the world will condemn this trial. You can’t have a trial without law.” -Joachim von Ribbentrop. Today the Nuremberg trials receive a lot of criticism for simply being victors justice. Many lawyers from around the world have enumerated flaws that were present at Nuremberg. Moreover, the biggest flaws at Nuremberg were the double standards the Allies used throughout the trials. First the Allies charged the German defendants with conspiring to commit aggression against Poland in 1939. However, no one from the Soviet Union was charged with this crime despite evidence suggesting they did. Furthermore the Germans were charged with mistreatment of prisoners of war, while France and the USSR both mistreated German prisoners of war. Once again no one from France nor the USSR were put on trial for these crimes. Moreover the United States of America was not held responsible nor was anyone put on trial for the two atom bombs that were dropped on Japan killing thousands of Japanese soldiers and civilians. Also the the London Charter allowed the use of evidence that was normally inadmissible in court. The tribunal was allowed to use any information they deemed to have probative value as evidence. Furthermore the court agreed to dismiss Soviet personal from the trials in order to conceal their own war crimes. A British weekly newspaper called The Economist summed up the hypocrisy and double standards of the trials stating, “nor should the Western world console itself that the Russians alone stand condemned at the bar of the allies own justice. … Among crimes against humanity stands the offense of the indiscriminate bombing of civilian populations. Can the Americans who dropped the atom bomb and the British who destroyed the cities of western Germany plead ‘not guilty’ on this count? … The nations sitting in judgement have so clearly proclaimed themselves exempt from the law which they have administered” To summarize, the Allied

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the aftermath of the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor the United States retaliated on August 6, 1945, at 8:15 a.m. the crew of the Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb over the city of Hiroshima. The bomb detonated 2,000 feet above the center of Hiroshima, destroying 60% of the city and killing an estimated 70,000 to 100,000 people immediately. Due to amount of civilian deaths this led to, we often ask ourselves if the bombings over these Japanese cities were necessary. To debate wether the bombing was necessary we should pay attention to Japans decision to continue to not surrender after the first bombing. If a country is that proud and resilient for them to still refuse to surrender after one nuclear bombing killing between 70,000 to 100,000…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Nuremberg and Tokyo trials were held to punish those that were involved in war crimes. The Nuremberg trials sought to punish “not only the guards and others who carried out the orders to commit atrocities, but also the leaders who planned the atrocities and gave orders (page 197).” This is important because individuals who were simply following government orders would still be punished. The Tokyo trials convicted military and government leaders, and the trials also exposed “many acts of brutality (page 198)”. The Nuremberg trials led the Allies to establish the International Military Tribunal.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Holocaust In American Life is a historical book written by Peter Novick and it was published in 1999. The Holocaust In American Life is a historical review about American views towards the Nazi Party from the Holocaust to the present day. One of the most significant points Novick’s makes in the book is another World War was dominating the United States of America’s thoughts from the citizens of the country to even the government. With this as one the major points discussed in Novick’s book this leads him to break the book into five major parts. The five major parts discussed by Novick about the Holocaust through American viewpoints is; Part One: The War Years, Part Two: The PostWar Years, Part Four: Recent Years, and Part Five: Future Years.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jeffrey Herf’s book Divided Memory: The Nazi Past in the Two Germanys studies the distinct ways in which post-World War II German national political leaders in both the East and West were influenced by both their pre-war beliefs and post-war “political interests in domestic and international politics”. Herf specifically addresses four questions he wishes to find an answer to: why did German politicians place such prominence on to Nazi crimes in mainstream political rhetoric after 1945; why did the “public memory” of the Holocaust differ so much between the GDR and FRG; how did each side “approach the issues of memory and justice”; and finally, “how did the Cold War affect discussion of the Jewish catastrophe in both Germanys? (p.2).” It is…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Truman is a war criminal, for what is the difference between the US government massacring civilians from the air, as at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the Nazis wiping out the inhabitants of some Czech or Polish village?”Goes the quote by G.E.M. Anscombe in Mr. Truman's Degree, and although this quote states that Harry S. Truman is a war criminal, it still applies to his crimes against humanity in Hiroshima. Harry S. Truman is to be charged on the act of a crime against humanity due to the extremity of Hiroshima, Lack of communication to Japan and Aftermath of Hiroshima. As the story of Harry S. Truman and Hiroshima begins to unfold, one should think to oneself, were the horrid attacks upon Hiroshima necessary? To begin with, Harry S. Truman…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Have you ever wondered why holocaust war criminals were imprisoned? Many holocaust war criminals would will be remembered for the acts they committed, the reasons behind there crimes and the consequences they faced. Holocaust war criminals are people who escaped their prosecutions of the murder of six million Jews and have fled to different continents around the world(Pruitt).They have been on the run for years now and many were caught but there is still a few out there. Others killed themselves to avoid being captured and punished. Once a holocaust war criminal was caught they have two options face their crimes or they manage to kill themselves before caught(United States).…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some people would argue that the bombs were justified because they did what they had to do to end the war. Others would say it wasn't justified due to all of all the lives that were lost. The war crime against Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified. Japan was already beaten down and defeated. They had no more allies left and were under a naval blockade.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the 6th day of August in 1945, the United States of America dropped the first Atomic Bomb to ever be used in warfare on the city of Hiroshima in Japan. Three days later, in Nagasaki, another was dropped. No one can contest that the events of these days were some of the darkest in history. However, what is contestable, is the validity of the United States decision to drop the Atomic Bombs. Some historians would argue that it was necessary to attain peace for all those involved in the second world war.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nuremberg Trials were the first trials in history to seek justice against an entire regime for aggressive war crimes. They took place immediately after World War II ended, the indictment happened on October 18th, 1945. The horrible war crimes included invading other nations, violating the Treaty of Versailles and the most horrific crimes against humanity. The Nuremberg Trials prosecuted twenty one defendants, all of whom were Nazi officers and part of six major Nazi organizations. The trials did not serve justice to the victims or the heartless inhumane crimes against them.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    usage of the atomic bombs was militarily unnecessary and immoral. Furthermore, it lead to the extensive loss of civilian life, therefore making these bombings justifiable only to a lesser extent. However, supporters of the bombings generally are of the opinion that they were instrumental in the Japanese surrender. These supporters also believe that the bombings were beneficial in preventing casualties on both sides, and helped in protecting America from further attacks, especially by Japan. Even before the atomic bombs were dropped, Japan’s surrender was imminent (Source B, Extract 1).…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision to drop an atomic bomb on the cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, respectively, was, simply put, a foolish, rash, and depraved action that could be classified as a diplomatic blunder, among other things; certainly it could not be seen as either a military necessity or a scientific experiment: for scientists already knew enough about their project to determine the consequences, at least in the short term, such that if the dropping was an experiment, it was the most morally depraved one ever conducted in the history of man; some historians and other contemporary world leaders apparently believed that the bomb would yield diplomatic benefits and impress the Soviets in such a way as to prevent mounting hostilities--almost fifty years of subsequent history attests to this faulty…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America dropping the atomic bombs on Japanese cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6th and August 9th, 1945, was a very controversial decision and the opinions as to if the attacks were justified or not differ between those living in Japan and the U.S. The U.S’s act of dropping the atomic bombs was not justified because the long lasting health effects the bombings had on the population was disastrous, Japan’s army was inevitably facing defeat, and the mass destruction caused by the attacks lead to social damages throughout Japan. Although the atomic bombs did ensure victory for the U.S and British forces, it was a victory that definitely came with a cost; the significant loss of the Japanese population.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holocaust Persecution

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ever since the Holocaust ended, people have always considered Jews to be the only victims. What about the others? The Holocaust had not only claimed the lives of Jews, but others as well. The persecution of not just Jews was a way to eliminate all those who were considered a threat to the Aryan race because of their disability, nationality, and ethnicity. During the Holocaust if one had any kind of disability, mental or physical, they would be persecuted.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Second World War Memory

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Second World War: Collective Memory and History- Historiographical Essay: Judt, T. “The Past is Another Country: Myth and Memory in Post-War Europe.” In Memory and Power in Post-War Europe: Studies in the Presence of the Past, edited by J.W. Muller, 157-83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. First Paragraph- Judt’s Main Arguments: Tony Judt’s essay The Past is Another Country: Myth and Memory in Post-War Europe details the immediate post-war European past that failed to face the various problems associated with the devastating effects of World War Two.…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays