The US Constitution is built up of many sections in order to form a better union. Federalist Paper 68 is a document written by Hamilton introducing the correctness of electing President through an Electoral College. It was decided that the election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities of our future leader, and the delegates running beside him.
Written in Federalist Paper 68 ¨The Vice-President is to be chosen in the same manner with the President; with this difference, that the senate is to do, in respect to the former, what is to be done by the House of Representatives, in respect to the latter.¨ The US Constitution also states ¨The other consideration is, that as the Vice-President may occasionally become a substitute …show more content…
Since the Constitution has been in place, there has been many faults to appointing new magistrates. Presidential candidates are now buying votes, many candidates have hired special populace to subjectify the citizens in order to compel their votes. As proven from the recent election of 2017, Hillary Clinton was accused of allegedly paying residents to protest in front of Trump Tower owned by a fellow candidate in which she lost to. Not only during the election but after, a past candidate bought the citizens, and rejoiced in their protesting. These acts of dishonor brought on many faults to the system of electing President. In fact much censure has been redeemed. For these reasons, Federalist Paper 68 is fallacious. That being said, The Constitution is just as, if not more, …show more content…
In recent years young inhabitants have been apt to follow their parents and or peers political point of view. In late years young citizens were more apt to stray from their parents and think for themselves. As a result Presidents such as Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, JFK were put into power. Young minds, during past years, have been distinctly more able to determine righteous Presidential Candidates for President. During the years 2008-2016 the first African-American President, Barack Obama, was in power. In the recent run for Presidency a women, Hillary Clinton, was in the race. The father figure, and even some mothers, believed that a women president following the first African-American would be a mistake. This statement is completely fine, other than the fact that most parents force this assertion into their youth. The youth nowadays are more influenced and less likely to stand on a leg of their own. Some may say that influence is a given, but should present and future candidates be elected by an influenced youth? Most of the youth judges who they are going to vote for from a biased source that dote on either the good or bad of a candidate, such as the news, instead of doing research
Written in Federalist Paper 68 ¨The Vice-President is to be chosen in the same manner with the President; with this difference, that the senate is to do, in respect to the former, what is to be done by the House of Representatives, in respect to the latter.¨ The US Constitution also states ¨The other consideration is, that as the Vice-President may occasionally become a substitute …show more content…
Since the Constitution has been in place, there has been many faults to appointing new magistrates. Presidential candidates are now buying votes, many candidates have hired special populace to subjectify the citizens in order to compel their votes. As proven from the recent election of 2017, Hillary Clinton was accused of allegedly paying residents to protest in front of Trump Tower owned by a fellow candidate in which she lost to. Not only during the election but after, a past candidate bought the citizens, and rejoiced in their protesting. These acts of dishonor brought on many faults to the system of electing President. In fact much censure has been redeemed. For these reasons, Federalist Paper 68 is fallacious. That being said, The Constitution is just as, if not more, …show more content…
In recent years young inhabitants have been apt to follow their parents and or peers political point of view. In late years young citizens were more apt to stray from their parents and think for themselves. As a result Presidents such as Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, JFK were put into power. Young minds, during past years, have been distinctly more able to determine righteous Presidential Candidates for President. During the years 2008-2016 the first African-American President, Barack Obama, was in power. In the recent run for Presidency a women, Hillary Clinton, was in the race. The father figure, and even some mothers, believed that a women president following the first African-American would be a mistake. This statement is completely fine, other than the fact that most parents force this assertion into their youth. The youth nowadays are more influenced and less likely to stand on a leg of their own. Some may say that influence is a given, but should present and future candidates be elected by an influenced youth? Most of the youth judges who they are going to vote for from a biased source that dote on either the good or bad of a candidate, such as the news, instead of doing research