Federalist 10 Summary

Great Essays
Essay Number 2: Examining Factions within Federalist 10

Federalist 10 is often considered one of the most highly regarded piece of political writings ever put to paper. Federalist 10 addresses the question of how to guard against factions and their propensity to cause a rift in a republic. Written by James Madison working under the pseudonym Publius, Federalist 10 was published on November 22, 1787. In response to Federalist 10 the Anti-Federalists would release two pieces of writing combating Madison’s ideas in the form of Cato number 3 and Brutus I. In his writings Madison does not call for a removal of factions, but rather finding a means to control them. In my opinion I find the side of the Federalists as more compelling than the arguments of the Anti-Federalists. Madison starts of his essay by talking about the dangers of a faction and the threat it poses to a government. Madison describes factions as the following: “By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community”
…show more content…
In a large republic there are men of large fortunes, and consequently of less moderation; there are trusts too great to be placed in any single subject; he has interest of his own; he soon begins to think that he may be happy, great and glorious, by oppressing his fellow citizens; and that he may raise himself to grandeur on the ruins of his country. In a large republic, the public good is sacrificed to a thousand views; it is subordinate to exceptions, and depends on accidents. In a small one, the interest of the public is easier perceived, better understood, and more within the reach of every citizen… (Montesquieu spirit of laws, chap. xvi. vol. I [book

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 51 Summary

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James Madison wrote the Federalist Paper No. 51 specifically to explain to the readers how this new government makes liberty possible. He explains the various checks and balances that have been placed in order to ensure that not one specific branch would have too much power. The Federalist appeared in many different New York newspapers such as The New York Journal and The Daily Advertiser. The Federalist essays were written as responses to the many antifederalist opinions against the Constitution and they were originally intended to be only twenty essays long but were instead continued due to the continued criticisms of the Constitution.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the constitutional convention, the federalist and the anti-federalist went head to head trying to create new laws for government. Many articles were written by James Madison; these articles were the federalist papers. Within these paper, Madison outlines that the constitution protects against tyranny by dividing power between state and government, by separating government into branches, having a checks and balances system, and having equal state representation among the states. In document A, James Madison states that power is “First divided between two distinct governments, state and federal.” This describes the idea of federalism, where state and federal governments share power; powers like declaring war and printing money belong…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, Madison’s idea from Federalist 10 was also incorporated into the Constitution. In his essay, he argued the importance of a Republic, opposed to…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Federalist Paper number ten was written by James Madison to guard against the issues of factions. In any society there will be factions, people with different ideals, religions, and points of view. In a republic this creates the problem of the mob rule, where only to opinion of the majority matters and the rights of the smaller groups are not protected. This is similar to Federalist Paper number nine in which he addressed the destructive role of a faction in breaking apart the republic.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When James Madison outlines the dangers of faction in Federalist No. 10, he defines faction as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united...by some common...interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens.” 1 This wording is critical for examining both the goals and pivotal ideas of the federalist movement. At first glance, this definition seems to reflect the very real fear of mob uprising. Certainly, it’s tone insinuates an image of mob citizenry diametrically opposed to a smaller elite. However, although this image may have captured this political component of the United States in November 1787, a closer inspection yields a less controversial interpretation.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Newly attained independence upon the denouement of the Revolution, provoked fierce debate concerning the proper governmental path. America was divided into two factions: Federalists and Republicans. James Madison in unison with his fellow federalists pursued a centralized government and ratification of the Constitution. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 assembled to address the increasingly overt weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first man to ease the fears and concerns of the people was James Madison. He promised that a Bill of Rights would be added to the Constitution as individual amendments if they would, in turn, be ratified. The greatest dissension and opposition towards the Constitution was in New York. In order to counteract the anti-federalists present in New York, James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote a conglomeration of essays called “The Federalist Papers”. These essays discussed the positive reforms that the Constitution would make, and how they would better the states as a whole.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    • Madison was speaking of bodies of countrymen who make an effort to promote their plans or economic ideals at the price of other citizens or in ways that conflict with the public good. They are also known as special-interest groups. In many governments they have come to control all of the central power, which would be a bad thing as all power would be ruled by one faction that would control the country and not improbably become oppressive. The biggest challenge for the Framers was to organize a government where monopolization would not be conceivable. To produce a political system that would be powerful enough to sustain regulation but would not jeopardize freedom.…

    • 1807 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The federalists support the constitution and want a strong national government. Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and James Madison were federalists. Most federalists are wealthy, educated and believe a strong national government should control the nation. The federalist papers were a series of essays in newspapers that were put together in a book in 1788 to support the constitution.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Madison thinks that the Republic proposed in the Constitution is what America needs. There are enough congressional representatives that a few dissenters will not have a large impact on the government, but there are not so many representatives that the government fails to give the people what they want. The checks and balances put into place on the branches of this government help to ensure that the citizens have rights and a say in the government, but they do not have so much control over the government that it threatens the social order of the…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Now, remove force and independence from the [people], and you will always find only those under its administration and no citizens” (Tocqueville, 64). Tocqueville argues that the passion and civic involvement of the citizens, though perhaps unenlightened, provides a necessary ingredient for any free republic. The clearest example of the benefits civic engagement brings is in the township, a governing structure where “as everywhere, the people are the source of social powers, but nowhere do they exercise their power more immediately” (Tocqueville, 59). The township’s embrace of the citizens ' passions and trust in the people to govern their own affairs creates a remarkable change within the public. In the township, where citizen learn to direct society, their natural “desire for esteem, the need of real interest, the taste for power and for attention, come to be concentrated; these passions, which so often trouble Society, change character when they can be expressed so near the domestic heart and in a way in the bosom of the family” (Tocqueville, 64).…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Following the American Revolution, the Articles of Confederation, the United States’ first written constitution, was ratified in 1781. The Articles of Confederation was designed to give the central government limited powers. American politicians feared that a strong central government could lead to tyranny similar to Great Britain’s government. Essentially, the Articles created a nation of sovereign states. Sovereignty status allowed states to govern themselves and interact with foreigners without the involvement of the central government.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1786 the federal government realized that America would not survive with the articles of confederation (“Articles of Confederation”). In the summer of 1787, 55 men gathered to amend the Articles of Confederation (“Constitution”). The Constitution had to have compromise for it to pass(“Constitution”). One of those compromises was the Bill of Rights (“Constitution”). There were two sides the federalist and the anti-federalist (“Constitution”).…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalists had the better argument overall because they had clear instances showing how a strong central government could become corrupt and lose interest in its citizens. They wanted the power to stay in the states because it would allow more control over what was happening within the nation and it would give citizens more protected rights. In the end, after several debates between the groups, they agreed on creating the Bill of Rights, which gave the citizens protected rights. In addition, they agreed on forming one central government that was made up of three branches, all with restricted powers because of the checks and balances between them.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    10 and No. 51 assume that it is in our human nature to be selfish. In Federalist Paper No. 51, Madison states that factions will always exist. The only way to prevent a faction from being too powerful is to have numerous factions competing with one another. Democracy and self­interest creates factions. Federalist Paper No. 10 gives specific ways to eliminate the negative effects that factions create.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays