Just after voting when Three said to Eight that” That person is dangerous killer you were at court and heard all the things.” Here this point is fallacy (cherry picking or begging the question) because he is only looking at points which are favor instead of looking at suspected points.
Again when Three said to eight”he is old enough and he murdered his father he is not innocent” . That statement is fallacy because court had not yet decided and again …show more content…
three said” The boy yelled it out. That’s enough for me.” It’s Ad Hominem fallacy because he is trying to prove his argument by presenting boy’s circumstances instead of providing facts.
When No. Twelve person said “you are trying tell us the old person is lied because he could be important” It’s fallacy he is ignoring fact of being his old and misinterpreting previous argument so it’s a fallacy.
When Ninth person replied to Third that” I am speaking from experience “ Is a fallacy because he said he is saying from experience but experience can’t be taken as proof so it’s fallacy argument.
When No. Three said to Eight that “When boy said I am going to kill you he means to kill his father don’t try to argue with me on that.” It’s a Equivocation or ambiguous argument saying I am going to kill you because people use it many times but most of the time they didn’t mean it so Third person is trying to put this ambiguous line as his supporting fact so it’s a fallacy.
When no. seven said that Ran walk what’s difference is a fallacy argument because both things are different.
When third person said that “he is a old man half of time he was confused how can he positive at any point?” Now he is contradicting himself initially he was trying to old man as his best claim but now he say he is old enough so it’s a