Dystopia (noun) — an imagined world or society in which people lead wretched, dehumanized, fearful lives. Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 is a book that introduces a dystopian society, founded on concerns about where the world was heading in 1953. Fears of how censorship and anti-intellectualism are affecting the world. The year is 2023, and there are no longer mass book burnings, but Bradbury’s concerns are still prominent today. Anti-intellectualism controls much of the censorship in society, redacting our history, culture, and diversity. Redactions motivated by paranoia that are left unchecked can be our ruin, which will create a very real dystopia within this world. Fear stemming from anti-intellectualism destroys our individuality and diversity
…show more content…
a complex of ‘related propositions’ that can be characterized as ‘resentment and suspicion of the life, of the mind’. . . and a disposition to constantly minimize the value of life.’” Essentially, anti-intellectualism stems from fear and paranoia that ultimately ruins existence. In a way, anti-intellectualism is very similar to anxiety. In life, our most meaningful experiences don’t happen every day, and oftentimes they don’t just happen out of the blue. Anxiety often prevents acceptance or willingness to experience change in a person, and if people let their anxiety win, they live very dull and fearful lives, too anxious to let themselves live. Had I let my anxiety win, I would have never met my best friend, had never made some of my best memories, and would have never gotten to where I am. Anti-intellectualism is like anxiety, in the form that both are derived from the same base of paranoia and overthinking. Both are destructive in the way that they can negatively impact a person, community, or society. Anti-intellectualism is the most harmful to mental health, specifically when anti-intellectualists go after content regarding diversity, culture, or history. The age group most affected by this focus on censorship is
a complex of ‘related propositions’ that can be characterized as ‘resentment and suspicion of the life, of the mind’. . . and a disposition to constantly minimize the value of life.’” Essentially, anti-intellectualism stems from fear and paranoia that ultimately ruins existence. In a way, anti-intellectualism is very similar to anxiety. In life, our most meaningful experiences don’t happen every day, and oftentimes they don’t just happen out of the blue. Anxiety often prevents acceptance or willingness to experience change in a person, and if people let their anxiety win, they live very dull and fearful lives, too anxious to let themselves live. Had I let my anxiety win, I would have never met my best friend, had never made some of my best memories, and would have never gotten to where I am. Anti-intellectualism is like anxiety, in the form that both are derived from the same base of paranoia and overthinking. Both are destructive in the way that they can negatively impact a person, community, or society. Anti-intellectualism is the most harmful to mental health, specifically when anti-intellectualists go after content regarding diversity, culture, or history. The age group most affected by this focus on censorship is