Explain Why A Lot Of Compromises Were Made At The Convention Of 1787

Improved Essays
A Lot of compromises were made at this convention. Some of these i will discuss during this essay. The convention was held in Philadelphia from a to September of 1787. All of the founding fathers of this convention retained the suspicion of concentrated power. They chose George Washington to be the moderator and then closed it to the public. One of these was known as the Madison’s Virginia Plan. This was by James Madison who was from Virginia. A national form of government should be established consisting of the branches Legislative, Executive and Judiciary. This type of government was very different than that of the Confederation. The delegates were set very much in their ways that they voted to accept this after only a very little …show more content…
This like the Virginia plan wanted a two house government. In the Great compromise the lower house would be based on the basis of population. Each one of the people that were slaves would be counted as three fifths of a person while the others would be counted as one. This was for the representation and taxation that was direct. Another thing that they talked about was the Constitution of 1787. People contributed this to James Madison. He had done the Virginia plan and talked more about the Constitution. There was two questions that arose during this called sovereignty and the question of limiting power. This also produced an answer to the problem of authority. This would be a less likely to produce tyranny. due to the fact that not one group would rule. They would have the power to check each other out. Separation of powers is a big deal in this. This created checks and balances. They also wanted the three main types of government which is judicial executive and legislative. These would constantly compete with each other . There would be two things that the bills would have to go though before they could be put through congress. This was created to help protect the united

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Question #1: The first compromise was the decision to replace the Articles of Confederation rather than amend it. The initial plan of the Constitutional Convention attendees was to amend the Articles of Confederation. Two attendees, Governor Randolph from Virginia and William Patterson from New Jersey, shared their own modifications early on, known as the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. As these plans were discussed, it became obvious that a new document was needed.…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison, an American statesman and a political theorist, wrote the Virginia Plan in 1787. The Virginia plan called for a strong central government with three branches known as executive, legislative, and judicial. The Virginia plan also called for a bicameral (two branches) congress. The bicameral Congress would have two houses (an upper and a lower house) and the two would meet separately and would have to agree upon a bill before it became a law.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Convention Dbq

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    6) After deciding on the rules that would govern the proceedings, delegates prepared to hear proposals on the critical issue that led to the convention: amending and improving the Articles of Confederation. They ended up writing the constitution. Therefore it exceeded its authority. 7) Would the United States have been better off if the Virginia Plan had been adopted as presented? a) States with a large population, like Virginia (which was the most populous state at the time), would thus have more representatives than smaller states.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The author of the book A Brilliant Solution, Carol Berkin, a successful American historian that was born in 1942 in Alabama and was awarded the Bancroft Dissertation Award, from her college at Columbia University where she was awarded and an M.A. and a Ph.D. He has written many books In her book, she summarizes the key elements in the creation of our current government and constitution. She goes into detail factoring in people's beliefs and views to help generalize an individual's standpoint on an issue. In the book, Ms. Berkin is trying to argue that the creation of the constitution was not an easy process but was very tedious work. The book A Brilliant Solution is divided into many chapters but its best summarized in the parts starting…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also suggested the idea of checks and balances. This is a great tool to use in America’s kind of government because it means no one section of government could become more powerful than the other, the government stays true to the equality values, and it avoids possible corruption. Madison also presented the Virginia Plan which recommended using three branches in our government, a legislative branch, an executive branch, and a judicial branch. This plan is now used as the basis of today’s…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to the “Articles of Confederation” inability to tax, and the rising debt, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison organized a conference at Annapolis in 1786. They planned a convention at Philadelphia to revise the constitution to make it more efficient. Two plans for the new government were discussed. The “Virginia Plan” included an executive and a judicial branch of two houses. The lower house representatives would be assigned by state according to population then the lower house would elect an upper house.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jack N. Rakove Summary

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After the convention, the ratification debates began and Madison (along with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay) was at the forefront with his Federalist Papers, arguing for the many points of his plan. In 1788, the Constitution was ratified…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the Great Compromise American leaders had to decide what plan of action they should take when improving America’s weak government. State representation was a major controversy between the north and the south. In my personal opinion, I think that states should have a proportional representation in Congress according to its population also stated in the Virginia plan. The reasoning behind my conclusion is that, yes, some states are larger than others and may be split in opinion.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Debate

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Prior to The Great Compromise of 1787, the two main plans put forth at the Constitutional Convention were the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. The larger states favored the Virginia Plan, as the number of representatives in both houses of Congress per state was based strictly on population, giving them more power. The smaller states preferred the New Jersey Plan, which ensured that all states had the same number of votes. The Great Compromise, which became the basis of the new American government, was possible through the coming together of the small states and the large states. In this new plan, the number of representatives per state in the lesser House was based on population and the number of representatives in the upper House was the same for each state, satisfying both sides of the debate (Lapsansky-Werner, 356).…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Small states were in favour of New Jersey Plan, under which all states would have equal representation in the legislature. On the other hand, large states advocate the Virginia Plan to form a Bicameral (two-house) legislature in which representatives would be appointed according to population. The Great Compromise between the states gave rise to a bicameral Congress in which states were given equal representation in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives. Roger Sherman played a decisive role in success of Philadelphia Convention. He is remembered as the architect of the Connecticut Compromise.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A bicameral legislature is defined as one in which the legislators are divided into two separate assemblies, chambers or houses. This system is what we Americans use in order to create balance between the powers of its citizens, and it’s government. The Framers being our founding fathers, believed that we needed this system to help America not return to the same overpowering form of government that they left behind when they departed from the British. The Framers of the Constitution created a bicameral legislature as part of their efforts to create separation of powers and to more generally, make it harder for the government to do just about anything without its citizens at hand. Before the start of the American Revolution, the British levied…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They implemented several anti-majority rules such as the electoral college system, a bicameral legislature and the judicial review process in order to safeguard minority rights and prevent “tyranny by the majority”. By creating the electoral college system, the founders ensured that the election of the president was not directly decided by majority vote but rather by well-informed representatives elected by the people This system would prevent the selection of the president based on the whims of people, allow less populous states to have a voice, and strengthen the concept of federalism, the sharing of powers between state and national government. The creation of a bicameral national legislature, a Congress composed of two separate chambers, the Senate and the House of Representatives, also eliminated future rule by the majority. In designing the republic, framers opted to have the House of Representatives elected directly by the people while senators would be elected solely by the state legislatures.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Weakness of the Article of Confederation During the course of the Second Continental Congress in 1777, the Articles of Confederation were adopted for the proposal of a central institution. This meeting started in 1775, gathered many of the most brilliant minds of that period at Pennsylvania. Delegates were sent from the thirteen colonies to represent in the convention. The convention was a series of meeting, on the attempt to solve political and social issues. One of the major concern was the concept of distribution in power.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Decision in Philadelphia: the constitutional convention of 1787 primarily revolved around analyzing the vast array of ideals brought to the convention in the attempts to create a free and prosperous United States of America. Being one of the more active members, a great majority of the book concerns itself with James Madison from Virginia but also examines the ideals of Hamilton, Paterson, Pinckney among a handful of others. Other ideals brought about by the other 54 members concerned problems of small vs large states, rights of its citizens, and the powers that the government possessed. Of all the members sent to the convention, easily the strongest and most outspoken was James Madison of Virginia. Well spoken and intelligent, James Madison worked from the minute he arrived.. Prior to the convention even starting, James drafted up a document eventually known as the Virginia Plan with served as a platform for which the convention to work off of. Although the Virginia plan was more of an outline than a hard copy, this was a benchmark for the convention and the constitution, leading to James being called by many the “Father of the Constitution”.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays