Summary Of Marx's Ontological Theory

Improved Essays
Marx’s basic ontological assumptions about humans and the nature of society
Ontology relates to the questions of being and reality. Marx ontologically assumed that humans are altruistic, material creatures and are creative in nature. He explains that humans meet fundamental requirements by creating necessities such as food and shelter out of the environment. Producing these items and structures expand the human capabilities and can be seen as a mode of self-expression. Marx elaborates on these necessary tasks by relating it to the workforce and stating that work should not be regimented and monotonous, but original and personally significant. Work should be something that we want to do rather than have to do. As classes are formed and work
…show more content…
Marx believed that capitalism would have an affect on a global level. He believed that capitalists would do everything in their power to find the cheapest labor, without taking the workers needs into consideration. “By focusing on the forces of production, Marx was able to predict historical trends…”(Reader, 2013:113). We can see this holding true, for companies are outsourcing and moving a lot of production out of the United States to countries with poorer economies and populations. The exploitation had been expanded on a larger scale. Marx believes that this capitalistic exploitation will gradually change to a socialistic society (with the rise of the proletariat) and “will eventually lead to a communist …show more content…
Men were usually the one’s selling their labor, but women were the one’s not getting paid to raise the men who are the future generation of men to be exploited. Marx also didn’t take into account that there aren’t always going to be simply two classes (the owners and the workers). As the state grew and contemporary societies became more complex, these two classes split. Take for example an owner of a “mom and pop” store. They own this business and hire workers, but still have to compete with larger companies, sometimes even exploiting them for cheap goods. Marx believes that this capitalistic society will eventually evolve into one of a communistic state, but there are too many factors in play to assume such drastic change. It would almost need an entire homogenization of the entire population to allow that to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This will lead to the unemployment rate to rise. Marx focuses on the working conditions of the employees. He blames the rises means of production will only harm the proletarians. He declares “Not only are the…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is an understanding of mine that Marx favours the communism lifestyle, even though he can afford to live in a bourgeoisie environment. Ultimately, he is advising the proletariats to cause an uproar against their oppressors and become historic, however, he does not have to suffer any losses as he is the advisor, not the participator. Consequently, these proletariats that do cause the uproar are going to be worse off, if they did not succeed, ultimately they would not be able to pay rent to their landlords and would not be able to buy necessities due to not using their labour for a wage. It seems unfair to advise a revolution to an organisation where they are losing more than their freedom, but their will to live in a bourgeoisie society. However, when he discussed communism to the proletariats it seems that communism is the answer they have be searching for throughout their lifetime.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Marx, the bourgeoisie class controlled the manufacturing system and established “new conditions of oppression” to control the proletariat (Marx, 159-160). Therefore, a class struggle existed and it was worsening for the proletariat class as the bourgeoisie were “constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society” (Marx, 161). However, for Marx, the exploitation of the proletariat for capital will not continue as the bourgeoisie are digging their own graves by continuing to oppress the working class (Marx, 169). Also, in contrast to Nietzsche who says that the slaves are weak and hopeless, Marx does not consider the proletariat as inherently weak. In fact, Marx is clear in stating that the “fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable” especially with the increase in the proletariat’s revolutionary consciousness (Marx, 169).…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1) What, according to Marx in The Communist Manifesto, must one understand in order to understand the course of historical development? What, in other words, is it that moves history along? The Communist Manifesto opens to the reader by stating, “The history of all hitherto societies has been the history of class struggles”, meaning that there is a perpetual tug-of-war struggle between class status between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Marx, 1). Marx states that the bourgeoisie are those who set up the production as “the class of modern capitalists”, whereas the proletariat is the group that works beneath the means of production from the bourgeoisie, “having no means of production of their own” (footnote, 1).…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx talks about the effects of globalization. “In place of the old wants, satisfied by the production of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes” (16). Here he is saying that because the bourgeois are expanding their consumption and production of new and different things, people are developing desires and wants for things they did not previously know existed. Due to this, old businesses of the native country are falling apart and being destroyed. He continues on to talk about self-sufficiency, and how countries are no longer self-sufficient because they are dependent on other places to receive products.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlotte Perkins Gilman argues about the fragility of women within the pecuniary sphere and how the economic standing for all people is defined and controlled by men. According to Gilman, human females are the only ones directly attached and solely dependent on men unlike other female species. In ‘Women and Economics,’ she examines the traditional roles of women and how this limited view prevents them from obtaining any economic dependence or identity outside of their husbands. Women do not “produce or distribute wealth,” which she finds highly problematic and cause for social and economic reform.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human reason can be simply defined as the ability of humans to make interpretations and judgments based on what they have learned and experienced throughout their lives. John Locke and Karl Marx both trust that humans are naturally good and are capable of making decisions and judgments on their own. John Locke expresses his ideas of human reason in his philosophical text Second Treatise of Government. Karl Marx explains his thought of human reason in his pamphlet The Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism The Crucible

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Imagine living in a world where no human oppresses another. Imagine living in a world where no one is poor and no one is rich. Imagine living in a world where the social class system is non-existent. Karl Marx, a 19th century philosopher, foresaw the image of this apparent communist utopia forming in every society; he expected the maltreated working classes to fight back against those who have immense, misused power. He believed that material possessions have a powerful enough influence on our lives to be considered the sole reason of historical change.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are two types of reproduction. The first, the reproduction of the character of a worker. Why does the average person go to work? Is it because she loves what she is doing, or is it because she needs to work in order to live? Marx explains, “the exercise of labour power, labour, is the worker’s own life-activity, the manifestation of his own life.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx stated that proletariat was oppressed and under the exploitation of the bourgeoisie. The workers would create products that the capitalist would sell for more than it was actually worth. There was profit from this system, but the proletariat did not benefit from it. According to Marx, this system would lead the society to self destruct. He believed the the continuation of exploitation would cause the proletariat to hate the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx and Marcuse had similar, but somewhat different, ideas on how society should function, and how the troubles of their society are hurting humanity as a whole. In this essay I will explain what each of their point of views are and analyze how their opinions of the past relate to our society today. On pages 474 and 475 of the Communist Manifesto, Marx explains how the bourgeois came into power. The bourgeois rose into power as the feudal system began failing. The falling of the feudal system fell in line with the rise of industrialization and colonialization.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Their system of administration combined both their own as well as Roman elements. The new social order saw the dominance of the military commander, who became the monarch & a new nobility, drawn from warriors and an educated, Romanised elite. Peasants, who constituted their armies, became impoverished due to continual warfare. This led to their enserfment to feudal lords. There existed 2 kinds of groupings in feudal Europe- serfs and lords in villages and craftsmen & journeymen or apprenti who were part of the guild organization in towns.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays