Exclusionary Rule Essay

Improved Essays
The Supreme Court adopted the exclusionary rule as a way of prohibiting the use of evidence in a court of law in situations where government officials directly or indirectly violate an individual’s constitutional rights to obtain evidence to secure a conviction. In other words, the exclusionary rule is a means of protecting the constitutional rights of the people from authoritative misconduct in violation of the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments against unreasonable search and seizure, coercion, and provides the right to counsel under due process of the law (Cornell Law School, 2007).
The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine can result in the dismissal of evidence collected at a crime scene as proof of guilt found in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment clearly states that the rights of the people are to be secure in their homes and person, papers and effects, and shall not be violated by unreasonable search and seizure, and no warrants shall be issued unless it is supported by probable
…show more content…
A warrantless entry and search for a suspect and to help victims in emergency circumstances is also permitted. Officers can secure evidence in emergency situations if the officers have reasonable belief the evidence will be destroyed in circumstances when there is no time to secure a warrant from a judge or magistrate. Plain view and consent given by the legal owner is also a cause for warrantless search and seizure procedures. Although the burden of proof to afford a warrantless search and seizure must be proven, given the totality of the circumstances involved (Brooks,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Aguilar-Spinelli Test

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the essence of lawfully securing the ability to invade and search someone else’s property to look for evidence of a crime, two approaches have been examined. One being the totality of circumstance approach which states that all facts and circumstances in the given situation should be looked at in each case individually, meaning that the whole picture needs to be examined in order to determine if there is probable cause to enter someone’s property for searches and seizures; the other approach being the Aguilar-Spinelli two pronged test, which was developed in Aguilar v. Texas and Spinelli v. United States and the two requirements were that, “The magistrate must be informed of the reasons to support the conclusion that such an informant is…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    cases also relates to the Fourth Amendment, which requires "search and seizure" of evidence, also known as the exclusionary rule (Srinivas, 2012, p. 179). The exclusionary rule states that, “Evidence must be collected and analyzed without violating the rights of the defendant; if the rights of the defendant are violated, then the evidence will not be upheld in court” (Srinivas, 2012, p. 179). Savana Redding is a 13-year-old eighth grader enrolled at Safford Middle School. She is an honor student who has no history of disciplinary problems or substance abuse.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth, I do concede that Dripps model of the contingent exclusionary rule is fascinating; yet, it is my opinion that there are pros and cons. It is without doubt that the present exclusionary rule is controversial. I also concede that there isn’t a need to completely re-invent the wheel. Conversely, Dripps argues in regards of the contingent suppression order in which prosecutors would have to choose between accepting exclusion of evidence obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment against the state under an administration of statutory damages (Tipton, 2010).…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fourth Amendment Warrants

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In chapter six, the author examines searches for evidence. The fourth amendment commands the use of warrants. As previously stated, warrants usually consist of three elements to meet the fourth amendment standard. I believe the knock and announce rule is truly effective procedure because this standard can protect officers from injury and more than likely preserve physical evidence from being destroyed. This is also a valuable tool in preventing a high risk target from escaping the scene.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States v. Leon case, the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule should not be applied so as to bar the use in the prosecution's case in chief of evidence obtained by officers acting in reasonable reliance on a search warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate but ultimately found to be invalid. Pp. 905-925. (United States v. Leon, (1984) No. 82- 1771.)…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lawful arrest Lawful arrest does not require a search warrant when arresting someone. The officer can search the person and any area surrounding the person. The police search the surrounding are for evidence that could be throw or destroyed within the suspect wingspan. The lawful arrest is also helps when searching a vehicle, when the suspect is arrested. The Supreme Court can let a police officer search a vehicle if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the vehicle has weapons or drugs that belongs to the suspects.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Probable Cause Exists

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Consent is one of the many types of exceptions that typically involves an individual giving law enforcement the right to search him or herself or their residence without a warrant. In order for the consent to be valid, it must be given without coercion or deceit. For the second exception, search incident to lawful arrest, law enforcement officers are allowed to legally search a person or their surroundings immediately after their arrest no matter what the individual was arrested for. Once the suspect is removed from the premises where the arrest took place all searches must come to an end. The purpose of this exception is to locate any possible weapons and provide a sense of safety to the officer during the process of an arrest.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This search eventually uncovered a different offense. Since the police did not have a reasonable suspicion that Mapp was committing this crime that he eventually was charged for, the Supreme Court later reversed this decision. One law that can over rule the Exclusionary rule is the Good faith Rule. If a search is conducted without knowingly breaking the law, the evidence found may still be used in…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a part of the exclusionary rule, there is a doctrine called the fruit of the poisonous tress, also known as derivative evidence (Gardner & Anderson, 2016). The fruit of the poisonous tree rule excludes evidence that is collected indirectly during police misconduct (Gardner & Anderson, 2016). Such evidence will be excluded as a result of this doctrine if the evidence illegally collected…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is drug testing of students who participate in extracurricular activities permitted under the fourth amendment? fourth amendment states that a person has the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Meaning that the people are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government while it does not guarantee against all searches and seizures, only those the law deems unreasonable. Which is determined by the balance of two important interests being…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Probable cause also plays a factor when attempting to acquire a search warrant. A search warrant must be signed by a judge where it authorizes police officers to search a specific place. The warrant must be convinced by affidavits that establish probable cause by their observations or those of informants or private citizens(Hayes, n.d). Doing so, this would prompt the judge to issue the search warrant and must act upon within 24 hours or so to put the warrant to effect, depending on the city or state as the time can…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Once the officers’ have obtained everything on the search warrant the search is done. They have to leave the location. Before leaving they will and should inventory all the evidence or items seized, all the people, and people not there, even if the people are not included on the search warrant. The search warrant should have information of where the warrant was issued, names of people who are the witness or that signed the affidavits, the reason why they issued the search warrant, the officer(s) name that requested the search warrant, time of when search will be done, if possible, the name of the judge or magistrate to whom the warrant will be returned to, date it was issued, magistrate or judges signature and their official title. The police may search a person and the immediate surroundings without a search warrant when they arrest someone.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is common for a search to be defined as any action by government officials, which involves seeking for indication of a violation of law. Nonetheless, according to the Court’s cases, a search ensues when there is a physical invasion into one of the “constitutionally protected areas” which can be associated with the Fourth Amendment: persons, papers and effects (Whitebread and Slobogin, 120). Silverman vs United States (1961) exemplify how searches have conditions. Evidence officers gathered by…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Exclusionary Rule

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the most controversial, and perhaps,most important American legal principle, is the exclusionary clause which under Constitutional law, holds that evidence collected or analyzed in violation of defendants constitutional rights is not permitted for use in criminal persecutions. Sparked by the famous case Mapp v. Ohio, the exclusionary rule has a fair share of critics who argue that police blunders let criminals go free. In the 1961 Supreme Court case, Dollree Mapp was convicted when police searched her house ,under a false warrant, for a suspected bomb fugitive and found “lewd, lavicious, or obscene material”, otherwise known as pornography. Mapp claimed the police had no probable cause to search for the obscene materials found; the Court let her go because the material had been seized without a warrant. Despite the occasional occurrence of criminals going free, the exclusionary rule is vital to democracy because the principle ensures liberty and justice in America for all.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays