Amino acid sensitive reagents can be used for detection of latent fingermarks only if the evidence is not wet (as water may wash away the amino acid residues). [5] The usual procedure of using amino acid sensitive reagents on evidence (porous substrates) involves dipping or spraying the items of interest with a solution of the reagent, followed by the application of heat and pressure. [1, 3] The first amino acid sensitive reagent to be used for the detection of latent fingermarks was Ninhydrin, which gave visible purple prints, due to the formation of Ruhemann’s Purple. [8] Another amino acid sensitive reagent is 1,8-Diazafluoren-9-one (DFO). A pale purple ridge pattern is visible upon the application of heat. [9] The quality of the print is thus directly related to the quantity of amino acids present. [5] All these detection techniques rely on the differences of the adherent, optical and fluorescent properties of the fingermarks and the porous substrates. …show more content…
Diane Hauze and Dr. Olga Petrovskaia, from the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn). During the evaluation of the compounds at the U.S. Secret Service (USSS) by Dr. Tony Cantu and Robert Ramotowski, it was discovered that this compound was capable of visualising latent prints. [10] Dr. Joseph Almog and researchers from the Israel National Police also synthesized and evaluated a considerable number of indandiones. [2] Australian researchers compared 1,2-indandione and 5,6-dimethoxy-1,2-indandione to ninhydrin and DFO. [11] Wiesner et al. evaluated the performance of 1,2-indandione (2 g/l in HFE-7100 solvent containing 7% ethyl acetate) on used checks. [13] These research papers concluded that indandione can visualize latent prints as well as or even better than DFO. Like DFO, the indandione do not produce strongly coloured initial print development (typically a pale pink colour), but they do produce strongly fluorescent detail when excited with green