Examples Of Confirmation Bias In Riveted By Jim Davies

Improved Essays
We as humans tend to have the belief that our opinions are based on conclusions that resulted from completely rational, objective reasoning. We think that we have considered all evidence equally before arriving at a conclusion, and if we were to be presented with enough evidence opposing it, we would be quick to correct ourselves. However, people have again and again proved that this is not how we form our opinions. In reality, we have the tendency to ignore information that challenges our established beliefs, choosing to pay a disproportionate amount of our attention to information that confirms our beliefs. This phenomenon is known as confirmation bias. Its implications were introduced in class by Dr. Jim Davies and expanded upon in his book, “Riveted”, which I will use to explain how the confirmation bias can cause problems in our …show more content…
Congruence bias is the tendency to avoid all other possible conclusions after a first conclusion is made. In other words, when a person feels like they have “found the answer”, they are unlikely to consider other possible answers. Davies suggests that confirmation bias and congruence bias originate from the same psychological mechanism. In both cases, it is a tendency to avoid information that challenges previously accepted views. Both of these behaviours can lead to errors with serious implications. In “Riveted”, Davies gives the example of a study done by Deanna Kuhn on how juries reach a verdict. The participants were given evidence and asked to determine guilt or innocence. The result was that most participants quickly came to a conclusion on what they thought happened and proceeded to search for evidence that supported their idea, rather than first look at the evidence and then reach a conclusion. This example demonstrates how this psychological mechanism of bias when looking at information can lead to irrational decisions and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The film, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest directed by Milos Forman, is the story about a man named Randle McMurphy who gets transferred from prison to a mental institution. In this film, there are examples of various concepts discussed in class. These concepts are, confirmation bias, overconfidence phenomenon, fundamental attribution error and false consensus effect. This paper is going to explore these concepts.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The act of actively combating our inductive bias in Kathryn Schulz’s Evidence in Kathryn Schulz’s essay, “Evidence”, the argument of the essay follows various situations brought up by Schulz, showing that people should take a positive approach to being wrong, and accept our error-prone nature, rather than obsessing with a perfect inadvertently-free ideal. Schulz ties together a lot of strong evidence, but fades back from a clear conclusion, steering the readers toward a relationship between error and the self. She further studies moral transformation on conversations, our attachment to a view wrongly identified due to our pre-conceived opinion off prior experience. Schulz stresses that in order for us to improve our relationship with to evidence,…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth Kolbert's article, “Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds,” in the New Yorkers February 2017 issue looks at some main ideas in three different psychological books about patterns in human reasoning and attempts to connect them to today’s politics. Her explanation of the studies and their outcomes were superb, though she could have done a better job at connecting these points to her political conclusion. It is difficult to distinguish what her main point is. She starts the article by describing a couple experiments done at Stanford on human reasoning.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of believing someone words or having solid information towards a subject has people misinterpreting what is fact or fiction. In the article Things People Say, Niel Degrasses Tyson crafts an argument that heavily relies on analogies and explains them to get the point across. Tyson begins his essay by questioning why people believed Aristotle’s theories and the negligence of religion to facts. The rest of the author’s article compares various heavily misinterpreted concepts like “what goes up, must come down” and “the sun is yellow” for example and corrects the reader why others believe this as factual information. Tyson concludes his argument by stating, “”.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Imagine placing yourself in a situation where you see someone getting stabbed or raped and somewhere in the back of your mind, something is telling you to not believe it’s actually happening, what would you do? Would you immediately take action or dismiss the situation and not believe it’s happening? After reading chapters four and five of Lauren Slater’s book, Opening Skinner’s Box, it explains both the meaning of the diffusion of responsibility and cognitive dissonance. The connection between these two chapters show the human mind can be such a powerful and curious thing, but can be dangerous as well. We as human beings may not realize the psychological traps that our mind can play on us when facing certain situations that we may not believe…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, when people think about the Pit Bull dog breed, they may immediately think of the words dangerous or aggressive, because that is what they hear the most from the news or other sources. Finally, another common bias that is evident in this situation, is the confirmation bias. This bias is defined as the tendency to pay the most attention to information that supports our beliefs, (Kassin, et al., 2014). When individuals are taught to fear this dog breed or have had personal experience with this breed in which it was aggressive, they may be very biased to believe that the breed is terrible. No matter how much evidence they are given that goes against their beliefs, they don’t budge.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is in human nature to search for and come up with answers, even when there is not enough factual information to back it up. The opinions formed by using minimal details are often wrong, but once formed they are hard to overcome. These unfounded judgments can follow a person forever, or at least until the one who made the judgment bothers to get to know the subject of their uninformed opinion. Even though people are aware that initial impressions are often incorrect, it is nearly impossible to surpass human nature and wait for facts to reach a conclusion. When reading "Fireweed", I immediately noticed the theme of restless tragedy.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Illusory Causation in the Courtroom, published in Current Directions in Psychological Science, G. Daniel Lassiter explores illusory causation in terms of the role it plays in courtrooms. This is the possibility of the effect that camera perspective has on jurors’ judgements on the suspect’s guilt, whether it was a voluntary confession and sentence recommendations. The Death Penalty Information Center had documented cases in which death row inmates were released due to new evidence and in many cases, the cause of wrongful convictions can be traced back to the interrogation phase in which false confessions are extracted. Many experts believe that the solution to suspects being coerced into wrongful confessions are videotaping confessions.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Public discussion is frequently a positive platform for opening discussion topics and easy worldwide access. However, in Merchants of Doubt authors Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway presents the dangers of relying on the public or popular platform. One of the major issues is the public platform is the number of people in the discussion only fuels to the argument, thus it takes longer to achieve their objectives. The other issue is the stakes and implications the debates have on policy. In general, Merchants of Doubt teaches readers it is important to understand the source of the issue versus what is being debated and to further examine the purpose behind each side.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans are more likely to agree with the first thing they see even if the information is not completely true, or they do not understand it fully. People then attempt to explain their opinion without fully understanding it themselves. Elizabeth Kolbert asserts that human ancestry predisposed humans to make irrational…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Conformism In Gryphon

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How do you know the color of the shirt you are wearing? Can you be sure that blue is really blue? Our knowledge comes from many years of schooling and facts taught to us by our parents, teachers, and what we saw in books and media. We regurgitate these facts in our daily lives. When something different comes along, we may get uncomfortable and resist it.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Confirmation Bias Essay

    • 2410 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Confirmation bias can be found in many stages of the investigative process. This is when one seeks or interprets evidence in ways that are in favor of existing beliefs, expectations or a hypothesis. (Nickerson, 1998). Confirmation bias can have two ways of going about it in an investigation one way is that you select information based on what your thoughts, or opinions line up with or are biased towards the evidence that is already available (Ask & Granhag, 2005). The issue of confirmation bias is very important because it can happen even in our day to day lives but when it is in the legal system it can be very dangerous to the person that is in the hot seat.…

    • 2410 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Every human being has the ability to decide what they believe and what they do not. At a very early age, we develop judgement that allows us to choose whether or not to accept certain claims. These assertions may be tempting, but our reasoning allows us to critically analyze the information with respect to all of our previous knowledge. These claims may be faith based, fact-based, or opinion. Without recognizing it, we take every bit of information we gather, analyze it, and decide whether we accept its validity.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The problem with people believing what the mass media, government officials, religious figures, and professors say is that it goes against the scientific approach. Their statements are bias, based on their own opinions, therefore, it lacks real evidence.. This information is not resourceful because it is being taught, shared, and written based on the person’s own perspective and…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Concepts are not mental images, but not word like entities either. Concepts are mental representations. The dictionary refers to a concept as a general idea or notion that corresponds to some class of entities that consist of characteristics or essential features of class . But it is not just a general idea. They, in fact, shape the way we live, through the way we think, act, judge, and more.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays