People can hold firm trust in a person or aspects of life; we associate this feeling with being confident . When we claim someone is ignorant, we assume they have no actual knowledge over something or its topic . And we could mix both of these aspects together in one person then our reference would be a red hearing personality. The question I have is why some people if not most have done this at least once in their life span. We can accept to stand ground in something we have no clue about and support it with wrong facts and knowledge. Our justification can be brought on by ones form of naturally developed ignorance.
The first form of ignorance one can form justifications on is basic or ordinary ignorance. Which can be broken down to the acceptance of not having any knowledge of something, but being able to learn the knowledge needed ; therefore, a better explanation of this form of unawareness would be a newly graduated college student moving to a new state or city for their career. Moving to a new place is hard enough in finding a new home and moving all your belongings there. Now you have to break down the hole city and know where all the street lead …show more content…
I’m at fault for using this type of ignorance because, I know that people are willing to help someone out when they don’t know how to do something. Another good example is when we see a school zone speed limit sign and the times, but given the day some people just willing choice to ignore this sign and they have to knowledge as to what time they should or shouldn’t speed but take the risk in braking this law. Which can lead to marks on your driving record and paying a ridiculous fine. The choice will always be yours to paly dumb, but are you smart enough to know when it is best to use this