9/11: The Inside Job
The war on terrorism has been a crisis for decades, a major event in the war against terrorism began after the supposed terrorist attack on the twin towers. The September 11, 2001 attacks also known as 9/11, were four coordinated terrorist attacks which caused the deaths of over 3000 people, the most deadly terrorist attack on US soil. As well as it has been reported to have been perpetrated by the Islamic terrorist group known as al-Qaeda. After further research it has come to my attention that 9/11 was an inside job crafted by the government. There are too many inconsistences concerning the supposed plane crash on the pentagon, the structure damage from world trade center (Twin towers) and the uncalled for collapse …show more content…
One of which ended up to be the pentagon (Headquarters of the United States department of defense).What seemed to be reported as a Boeing 757 with a total wingspan of 125 feet and a length of 177 feet. Yet many questioned have been asked from the public like “where is the plane that crashed into the Pentagon? Where are the wings, the tail, the two 9-foot Rolls Royce steel engines, the fuselage, etc.? How does a Boeing 757 with a wingspan of 125 feet fit into a 16 by 20 foot initial impact hole” (911 Blogger), wouldn’t there be some damage from the wings hitting the pentagon, the wings wouldn’t disintegrate on impact because there was not enough time, it’s made out of aluminum alloy which a strong metal. This attack on the pentagon seems more of a cover up than an attack. After the incident and further investigation on the pentagon the damages given do not related to the damages estimated by the size of the plane. Could it be that it was a US missile that hit the pentagon? Witnesses state that there were no planes that hit the pentagon although there are some witnesses that say there was a plane that hit the pentagon. Unfortunately no footage has been released to the public. This makes in quite skeptical to people because this brings the point closer to the fact that 9/11 was an inside …show more content…
“Building seven was a 47-story skyscraper and was part of the World Trade Center complex. Built in 1984 with a steel structure, it would have been the tallest high-rise in 33 states in the United States. It collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, 2001. It was not hit by an airplane and suffered minimal damage compared to other buildings much closer to the Twin Towers”, (Remember building seven). Again this proves the point that armed demolition was used because the building collapsed in a symmetrical matter, it did not tip over but fell vertically, and from what was left was a small pile of rubble. Some floors on building seven were on fire but they were small compared to other fires. The fire was not enough to melt the steel in fact no steel frame building have ever suffered a collapse. So how did building 7 ended up as a small pile of rubble after collapsing? Another stronger point for piece of evidence for controlled demolition of building seven is the speed at which the building fell. “It was a 576-foot tall building, and from video footage it shows that it fell in 6.5 seconds. A marble, with nothing but wind resistance in the way, would fall for roughly 6 seconds” (9/11 hard facts). This being said somehow, the top of the building fell to the ground in a perfectly symmetrical downward trajectory, with 47 floors of steel, concrete, and thousands of tons of upright standing debris in its path providing huge amounts of
The war on terrorism has been a crisis for decades, a major event in the war against terrorism began after the supposed terrorist attack on the twin towers. The September 11, 2001 attacks also known as 9/11, were four coordinated terrorist attacks which caused the deaths of over 3000 people, the most deadly terrorist attack on US soil. As well as it has been reported to have been perpetrated by the Islamic terrorist group known as al-Qaeda. After further research it has come to my attention that 9/11 was an inside job crafted by the government. There are too many inconsistences concerning the supposed plane crash on the pentagon, the structure damage from world trade center (Twin towers) and the uncalled for collapse …show more content…
One of which ended up to be the pentagon (Headquarters of the United States department of defense).What seemed to be reported as a Boeing 757 with a total wingspan of 125 feet and a length of 177 feet. Yet many questioned have been asked from the public like “where is the plane that crashed into the Pentagon? Where are the wings, the tail, the two 9-foot Rolls Royce steel engines, the fuselage, etc.? How does a Boeing 757 with a wingspan of 125 feet fit into a 16 by 20 foot initial impact hole” (911 Blogger), wouldn’t there be some damage from the wings hitting the pentagon, the wings wouldn’t disintegrate on impact because there was not enough time, it’s made out of aluminum alloy which a strong metal. This attack on the pentagon seems more of a cover up than an attack. After the incident and further investigation on the pentagon the damages given do not related to the damages estimated by the size of the plane. Could it be that it was a US missile that hit the pentagon? Witnesses state that there were no planes that hit the pentagon although there are some witnesses that say there was a plane that hit the pentagon. Unfortunately no footage has been released to the public. This makes in quite skeptical to people because this brings the point closer to the fact that 9/11 was an inside …show more content…
“Building seven was a 47-story skyscraper and was part of the World Trade Center complex. Built in 1984 with a steel structure, it would have been the tallest high-rise in 33 states in the United States. It collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, 2001. It was not hit by an airplane and suffered minimal damage compared to other buildings much closer to the Twin Towers”, (Remember building seven). Again this proves the point that armed demolition was used because the building collapsed in a symmetrical matter, it did not tip over but fell vertically, and from what was left was a small pile of rubble. Some floors on building seven were on fire but they were small compared to other fires. The fire was not enough to melt the steel in fact no steel frame building have ever suffered a collapse. So how did building 7 ended up as a small pile of rubble after collapsing? Another stronger point for piece of evidence for controlled demolition of building seven is the speed at which the building fell. “It was a 576-foot tall building, and from video footage it shows that it fell in 6.5 seconds. A marble, with nothing but wind resistance in the way, would fall for roughly 6 seconds” (9/11 hard facts). This being said somehow, the top of the building fell to the ground in a perfectly symmetrical downward trajectory, with 47 floors of steel, concrete, and thousands of tons of upright standing debris in its path providing huge amounts of