The petitioner could rely upon the decisions in Lamb’s Chapel (1993) and Good News Club (2001), which struck down similar policies against religious groups operating in school facilities in non-school hours on the basis of …show more content…
In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), though the Court sustained the use of public funds for the transportation of parochial school students, it also decreed that no tax regardless of its size could be leveled to support religious activities. Indeed, the construction, heating, cooling, cleanliness, and electricity of public school facilities are all accomplished with taxpayer funds. Despite the facts, it remains necessary for the State to prove that the use of the facilities by a religious organization would serve to further religion and that the challenged policy is, or at least is more, neutral towards religion then a policy without the prohibitions against religious services and