Evaluating The Divine Command Theory (DCT)

Improved Essays
In this essay, I have decided to explain and evaluate the divine command theory (DCT). The divine command theory focuses on the conception that God’s commandments are the foundation of ethical choices (Holt, T 2008). The theory states that whatsoever God wills as moral is moral and what God forbids is immoral. (Rachels, J., S 2007). The theory is very clear on its views in that if you want to know if something is moral go to God those that live by this theory look to religious book such as the bible to find the answers to life’s questions. This theory is also a matter of great dispute with the most well-known being Euthyphro’s Dilemma which asks if something morally correct because God commands it, or does God command something because it is morally correct? …show more content…
For example, the bible states that whoever strikes his/her parents shall be put to death (Exodus 21:15) the offense is a direct disobedience of the sixth commandment honor thy mother and father, but it is also in direct conflict of the seventh commandment thy shall not kill. This is the dilemma with this theory is something moral because God says it is, Gods says it is wrong to kill it is one of his highest rulings, but also say that those who disobey him or his other commands shall be put to death, does that mean murder is moral if God says it is in certain situations? This theory can also be hard to understand or justify to someone who is an atheist, you cannot sell someone on a something that they don’t believe in from the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The book is designed to provide a textbook that gives insight defining the differences and differing perspectives to Christian Ethics. The book also provides a comprehensive analysis three of the distinct phases of western Christianity. The book is divided into five sections, the first section pertaining to the methodological issues in Christian ethics. The second through section four focuses on the issues in social ethics. Section five pertains to the personal status.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many opponents of the Divine Command Theory but very few have plausible arguments. Bertrand Russell argues that if piety is because of God’s authorization, then to God “there is no difference between right and wrong” and because of this, Russell says it cannot be said that God is good (Russell 12). He also says that in order to say that God is good, one must agree that morality and immorality have meaning separate from God’s authorization because “God's fiats are good and not good independently of the mere fact that he made them” (12). One valid point Russell brings up is that to assume God is good would mean that He is unable to command anything that is evil. This argument allows that God can haphazardly change whether an action is moral or not.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Protagoras, a Greek thinker and teacher, while commenting about his affliction to human reasoning and logic, quipped, “Man is the measure of all things.” (Jowett, 1871, p. 17) Just as Protagoras held this philosophy, and the reliance of man to act as man, it is unlikely he could have ever known how Socrates, some many years later, would prove him right. This affirmation was best evidenced by the philosophical argument held between Socrates and Euthyphro regarding man’s moral obligations, and holiness.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are six evaluative principles that are used to evaluate moral theories. They are Consistency, Applicability, Publicity, Internal Support, External Support, and Explanatory Power. I am going to evaluate Divine Command Theory, Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, and Virtue Ethics using these six evaluative principles. First is Divine Command Theory (DCT). For Consistency, DCT is consistent because God either commands an act to be either right, wrong, or it is permissible if God has not claimed if it is right or wrong.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Romans: The Natural World

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For example, Christians believe that murder is a sin and the Bible tells us “you shalt not murder”, and yet abortion is legal in the United States. This just confirms more of what Romans teaches, that the law cannot solve humanity’s problems (Romans…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This problem proves that there is a separate standard of right and wrong that has nothing to do with God or His commands. Most believers want to acknowledge an idea that right and wrong was created by their religion and God because they think they are not religious if they don’t associate right and wrong with God. Since this theory fails to connect morality with God, then believers of Him would dismiss it. This dismissal of the theory should not alter their faith in God, though. Many scholars and believers, like St. Thomas Aquinas, refused the Divine Command Theory for this reason but still believe in God and His instructions.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Is something good because God likes it? Or does God like things because they are good?” This was the question asked by Socrates during his discussion on Piety with Euthyphro. This question is still a point of contention for philosophers to this day, and is known as “Euthyphro’s Dilemma.” There are two main forms of thought on this issue.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Divine Command Theory explains that actions are good if and only if God commands them, and actions are bad if and only if God forbids them. This makes the Divine Command Theory independent of human thought and feeling, it is God who determines what actions are moral. If we were to disobey God that would be an immoral thing to do and thus, we would be punished. We are motivated to follow this theory because it is the only reason why we still follow moral laws.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Divine Command Theory is a theory that proposed that an action’s status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God. There are two objections to the Divine Command Theory. Even if all religions agree about how God regards some action, there is still the question of whether or not they correctly report what God commands. Although this point is offered as an objection to the Divine Command Theory, Sober does not think that it shows that the theory is false. He thinks that the theory doesn’t claim to describe how we can find if actions are right or wrong.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    With the divine command theory, it makes someone justify an extremely horrific act by claiming God authorized us to do so. This is explained by the divine perfection argument, which is against the divine command theory. If the divine command theory is true, then a morally perfect God could have created a flawless morality that required us to rape little children. But a morally perfect God could not have issued such commands, anyone who did would be morally imperfect. Therefore, the divine command theory is…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are they right or are they wrong? Moral opinions are different among people and are not any clearer in the Bible. We cannot know for sure on some subjects, which are right or wrong. We can on speculate about them and try to make whichever decision feels better. If God gave us morality we would automatically know what was considered right and what was considered wrong.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Divine Command Theory

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Another issue with Divine Command Theory is that it is impossible to determine whether or not god actually exists, and if he does exist, does he command humanity at all. (Shafer-Landau) Another flaw in Devine command theory is explained by Shafer-Landau thru his description of The Euthyphro Argument. He summarizes the argument by saying that god may or may not have reasons for his moral code. If god has reasons for his moral code, than those reasons are what make actions moral or immoral, which disproves Divine Command Theory.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This suggests that no action can be held as being morally good unless God commands it. However a major problem with this is that Gods commands are seen to be arbitrary. There is no moral reason for Gods will, as he invents morality. This leaves morality with no rational structure. We can exemplify this with the following example; God commands that one should honour and respect their mother and father, and this is morally right.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The strengths of this theory are that some people believe that you can’t separate morality and religion, it provides a moral law and we as people have motivation to follow those laws, it preserves Gods authority. People who believe that religion and morality is inseparable are those that believe that “…religion is the source or basis or morality and that moral precepts are simply what God says should be done… the moral law is the will of God, and the will of God is the moral law” (Vaughn, 9). Without moral reasoning where would our society be? In article “10 Commandments List” by Mike Bennet, list the religious moral rules; “1. You shall have no other gods before me…6.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thirdly, God 's commands are good regardless of what he commands, and he has the freedom to command anything. Fourthly, obedience results in the individual spending eternity with…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays