Essays Against Euthanasia

Improved Essays
Do humans control the way in which they enter into this world? Does the family who has a precious baby born with a disability have the authority to give the child back to his or her creator? Even more so, do the parents have the right to end the child’s life because they foresee the difficulties this child will face? No, they do not have those rights, and neither should anyone else have the right to end his or her life. Euthanasia is a procedure that should be banned from our society.
God controls life and death; no human should try and take this kind of power into his own hands. Playing God is not something that is morally correct; however, people do not want to die as a vegetable. They would like to die with dignity and euthanasia gives them this opportunity. The liberals view medical decisions as the expression of personal autonomy, but the
…show more content…
It would seem to most people yes, but others look at it as an escape. Several participants said assisted dying went against the principles of care, which are “to keep life going” (Tomlinson, Spector, Nurock, Stott 724). The answer to the question of murder is not answered. Why, because euthanasia was created to help people. The process of the once caring drugs are manipulated into the weapons of taking one 's life. “It is for the family of the patient.” One doctor says in the article “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in patients with dementia”. What about the patient? What about the life that is ending? Doctors will tell the patient and family member that PAS/E is like CSD, and that PAS/E is reversible. It is not. CSD is continuous sedation until death, but PAS/E ends one 's life almost instantly (Lipuma 192). It cause the patient to permanently lose consciousness and die a biological death. So society, is this murder? Murder is the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The definition of murder is the unlawful premeditated killing…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin an educated discussion on the issue of Physician-Assisted suicide, one needs to understand what is it. PAS is described as the voluntary termination of one’s own life by the administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect aid of a physician. In the United States, and in most jurisdictions PAD is prohibited with specific statutory provisions or judicial application of more general statutes (Quill & Sussman, 2017). Pain and suffering though complex problems are prima facie treatable. Because of the advancement in technology and the understanding of pain control a movement has begun to push, state-of-the-art palliative care as the standard of care for any end of life suffering.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They then move into a hospital culture where a death, even among aged, is seen as a failure,” (102). In physician assisted suicide, it is imperative to realize that the patient is choosing to die with dignity and on their own terms instead of being deteriorated by sickness. Ultimately, a doctor’s main purpose is to cure their patient, but in extreme cases with no cure, there is nothing one can do except to alleviate suffering. By giving the patient the choice of death, physicians are allowing their patient to die on their own terms and with…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If patients wish to end their life, there are two different methods they can use: physician assisted suicide (PAS) or euthanasia. The ultimate difference between these two methods is that in PAS, the patients are required to commit the last act that will kill them, even though physicians would have to be involved in order to prescribe them the lethal drugs. Thus, the actual killings would be the patients’ work. Euthanasia differs from PAS in that it must only occur when patients would otherwise endure suffering throughout the remainder of their lives.…

    • 2191 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many wonder if euthanasia is right and moral and if it is not what should be done when being faced with this situation. I think the best way to look at physician-assisted euthanasia is through consequentialism and deontology. It’s important we look at the consequences of physician-assisted suicide because they are literally the difference between life and death. A patient that is gravely ill or in a coma may be diagnosed and given a time limit until death, however, some patients have surprised their doctors.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS) is one of the most controversial ethical issues in our society today. Many have speculated about the benefits or dangers of physician assisted suicide. But whether it should be legally approved is a questions with no easy answer. In PAS medical help is provided to enable patients to perform an act that is specifically intended to take his or her own life, for example, overdosing on pills prescribed by the physician for that purpose. PAS should be distinguished from euthanasia, in which it involves the physician performing an act that is specifically intended to end a patient’s life, through for example, lethal injection.…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should euthanasia be legal in the United States? Originating from the Greek terms "eu" (happy or good) and "thantos" (death), euthanasia literally means "happy death" or "good death". It is commonly defined as, “the act of bringing about the death of a hopelessly ill and suffering person in a relatively quick and painless way for reasons of mercy” (LeBaron 1). Assisted suicide is a form of euthanasia, when a person helps commit suicide or provides information of how to do so to another person. A person taking another person 's life without his or her request in order for that person not to have ample suffering is a mercy killing.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) has been a heavily debated topic for more than 100 years. Critics and supporters, both have very strong opinions on the topic. Physician-assisted suicide, formerly known as active or voluntary euthanasia, is defined as purposely committing suicide with the aid of a physician (Fecio McDougall 1). The act is usually performed through a lethal dose of medication. The medication may be administered by the individual or someone other than the physician; however, the physician provides the patient with the means necessary to carry out the act (“Right to Die”).…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dr. Kallfelz PHI 3323 – 01 November 11, 2015 Euthanasia Euthanasia is directly or indirectly bringing about someone’s death for their own sake. There are four different types of euthanasia, such as voluntary euthanasia, non-voluntary euthanasia, passive euthanasia, and active euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia is when the patient or legal guardian agrees or requests euthanasia. Non-voluntary euthanasia is when the legal guardian agrees or requests to euthanasia while the patient is incapacitated or incapable of making the request. Passive euthanasia is withdrawing and withholding action, allowing the patient to die.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While it is often argued that assisted suicide or euthanasia is a right of people to have a choice. One cannot deny that choosing whether you want to die or not is your decision and not the cold blooded type of murder you imagine. Nevertheless, we must make it imperative that assisted suicide is not legal because of the way it is violating the basic tenets of medicine with these purposely lethal drugs. Firstly, as Ira Byock, a writer for Los Angeles Times, informed the public, “People who are disabled or facing life's end can be cared for in ways that allow them to feel respected, worthy and valued.” This declares how prescribing lethal drugs to intentionally end one’s life is not the only option.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    INTRODUCTION Euthanasia in Australia is illegal however this violates our basic rights as humans. Choosing to die supports an Australian’s basic human rights and the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Euthanasia gives humans the opportunity to die with dignity and alleviates any unnecessary suffering. Assisted suicide is already a widespread practice therefore, it is better to have it legalised and regulated so that the people involved can receive the counselling and support needed during what is already a difficult time. This approach works for both the person intending to die and also the families and friends close to the person.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The discussion on physician-assisted death (PAD) and euthanasia has been fenced with controversy whether by the media or in philosophy. Considerably, the arguments that surround this issue has increased periodically due to the fact that health care and medicine has evolved continuously to safeguard not just patients and families, but all health care providers as well. Physician assisted death is “the voluntary termination of one’s own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician” (Westefeld et al., 2013, p. 539). Oftentimes, PAD is erroneously used interchangeably with euthanasia. According to Dieterle, euthanasia occurs when the active instigator of death is the physician.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reasons behind Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted suicide (PAS) claim that terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified, and compassionate death (Should Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide be Legal?). The right to die is every human’s choice. Choosing Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide can provide a terminally ill patient with a good end. It can also make it easier on the patients’ family knowing that they chose that it was their time to go. When choosing Euthanasia, the patient is showing strength and dignity.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To defeat this belief and undermine such closed minded views, I will raise an argument against active euthanasia in hopes to encourage doctors and other individuals to reconsider their current thoughts. Although, one might disagree with Rachels stance, I agree with his argument because there is no significant moral difference between passive and active euthanasia as the person will presume to be deceased after all. Thus, making his argument consistent and the doctrine, active euthanasia, just as justifiable and permissible as passive euthanasia. In some cases, it is permissible to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die, but it is never permissible to take any direct action intended to kill the patient. Not only is this view adopted by most doctors, but it is accepted in the American Medical Association statement: “…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics