Essay On Canadian Constitution

Improved Essays
Canadians live their life with utmost freedom. Many do not know or realize the source that is providing them with the freedom they enjoy and take for granted. The Canadian Constitution sets out the basic principles of the democratic government in Canada, and protects citizens. Within the constitution is the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Charter is what sets out these rights and freedoms in the free democratic society. The Canadian Constitution is an appropriate blueprint for the structure of Canada, proving that it protects us from the government, each other, and provides basic human rights.

If one were to think of the Constitution as a design or plan for the framework of Canada, it can be proven that it is an appropriate plan. Canada’s identity as a country is known to be deeply diverse and culturally rich. The Canadian Constitution reflects that. It protects Canada’s multicultural heritage. It gives equal rights to every citizen, permanent resident, and newcomer.
…show more content…
Section two states the fundamental freedoms. This includes the freedom or religion, the freedom of thought, freedom of peaceful assembly, and freedom of association. The inclusion of this section in the Charter is very significant. To realize its importance one can conceptualize the section not being included. Canadians would not be able to practice their religion, one of the major cultural systems. Not having a major cultural system would result in losing multiculturalism. Losing freedom of thought would also impact the different opinions and beliefs Canadians carry, depriving Canada from diversity. Now, all that has been conceptualized are two parts of a section from the Charter and already we see the effect it will have. It will cost the country to get rid of its diversity and multiculturalism, which is what Canada is known for. Not just this section, but all 34 contain key points which together make up Canada as a

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    He asks the reader to consider the common objections to Charters, explained previously, and then elucidates: “In each case we can see that the criticism is premised on the following critical assumption: Charters aspire to embody fixed points of agreement on and pre-commitment to moral limits on government power .” But what if they weren’t is the unspoken implication that follows it, and that is precisely the point that Waluchow is trying to make . Basing his argument on the previous work of H.L.A. Hart, as well as from the “Persons Case” ― or rather, Edwards v Canada (AG) ― Waluchow describes his conception of a Charter is as a living tree; keeping the benefits of entrenched Charters while avoiding the majority of the criticisms from Waldron . A middle way, then ― a constitutional modesty which uses a common law understanding to give the Charter the freedom and flexibility it requires to grow and adapt to a changing environment, while maintaining the “fixity of entrenched, written law ”.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    “Through the new constitution, Canada codified and affirmed many common-law rights into the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Part I), recognized the treaty rights of aboriginals (Part II), codified equalization (Part III), finally established an indigenous amending formula (Part V), and in the Schedule included some (but not an exhaustive list) of the other Orders-in-Council and Acts of Parliament that form part of the overall Constitution of Canada”. This means that with the new Constitution Act, their have been many parts added to it which give people rights and freedoms. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a guideline to what rights every citizen is allowed. This is important because without these rights, citizens wouldn’t have…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A constitution is the basis of law that may be written or unwritten, to lay the foundations within a political system. This construction is to restrain the people and the government from becoming too powerful and keep order, for the protection from one another, and others. The United States Constitution is the absolute law of the United States of America that defines the rules and principles by which this country is governed, and the Constitution of Texas is the document that details the structure and function of this one state. Although they bear some superficial similarities, the differences between the Us Constitution and the Texas Constitution are pronounced as far as the document and government structure.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Canadian Charter Preamble

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The preamble to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom states, “Canada is grounded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God” (Russell 1999). According to Russell (1999), this can also be considered the “God-clause.” The three articles discuss this notion of stating “the supremacy of God” in the preamble of the Canadian Charter. Although the articles have different views about the preamble, I highly agree with Russell’s (1999) article titled, “The Supremacy of God does not belong in the Constitution”. To begin with, Russell’s (1999) overall argument is that ‘God’ should not be mentioned in the preamble of the Canadian Charter.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The 18th century was a time of change and reform for Americans. Having gained newfound independence from Great Britain, they now faced the task of coming up with an efficient way to govern themselves. After a long process, both the Constitution, and eventually the Bill of Rights, both emerged and both which are still the governing documents of America today. In Jack Rakove’s book, Declaring Rights, he states that “how Americans thought about bills of rights was a function of how they thought about constitutionalism more generally.” He was correct in his statement; Americans views on constitutionalism did directly affect how they viewed bills of rights.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The British North America Act, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms have created a situation in which the legislation to protect the people from the power of the Court is muddled down, and what is left is an oligarchy of people from one singular ethnic background and very similar socializations. The ability of the Court to strike-down legislation written by a democratically elected commons defies the will of the people. Thus subjecting them to live by what another body believes ought to be morally and legally right, showing that this institution challenges the democratic values of Canada, and is operating with an excessive amount of…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Quebec Sovereignty Essay

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If Canada were to allow Quebec special constitutional privileges such as allowing them there own constitutional veto, appointment of supreme court judges, and have them recognized as a distinct society, and allow them the possibility of secession, then other parts of Canada may start to want their own constitutional amendments that could ask for the same thing which could literally destroy national unity and tear our country apart. With the increased threat of Quebec nationalism and a newly elected separatist government, it would be best advised for the rest of Canada to slightly increase the power of the central government to enforce a Canadian nationalism rather than just regional nationalism. It is highly recommended that the federal government control social and cultural policy so that Canada can have a unified social culture. On the other hand, issues like job training, education, health care and social assistance should be controlled by the provinces but allow some federal oversight to make sure that all the provinces are getting adequate government funding to the need of each province. Centralization is important because it ensures that each province is running its government efficiently and that all provinces are getting the same resources…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas State Of Pride

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A constitution is an agreement or proposal of government that signifies, in essence, a deal between the government and the governed. Like any agreement or contract it recognizes mutually settled controls, responsibilities, commitments and boundaries on contracting parties, and creates methods for action, including law-making and citizen-voter involvement. Since constitutions are the main source of democratic governance and political "rules of the game," they manage to be automatically admired by the over-all populace and reasonably valued by political…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms forms the first part of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Charter guarantees civil rights to everyone in Canada and was designed to unify Canadians. The Charter was signed into law by Queen Elizabeth II of Canada on April 17, 1982 along with the rest of the Act. “However, the Bill of Rights is only a federal statute, rather than a constitutional document.” (Wikipedia 04/06/15)…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The entrenchment of the Canadian Charter of Rights and its relation to democracy in Canada has been at the core of many debates throughout the years. A democratic government is one that allows the people to have a direct hand in what goes on in their country and some believe that entrenching the charter of rights in the constitution is a violation of the principles of this democracy. Although the charter of rights is entrenched, the charter of rights is very abstract in its rules and allows for flexibility when decisions are made. Adding to this, section 1 and 33 of the charter of rights is explicit in overcoming the argument that the entrenchment of the charter of rights violates any principles of democracy. Throughout my essay, I will argue…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Charter of Rights and Freedoms was established in 1982 and since its creation it has made a huge impact on the legal and political landscape of Canada. Some believe that the Charter has undermined democracy and put too much power into the hands of the courts that are not elected by the people. Some also contest that the Canadian courts are becoming lawmakers and are becoming activists. However, these claims have little truth when looking at what the Supreme Court has accomplished since the enactment of the Charter. The courts use and distribute their power conservatively because of how it effects the Canadian political landscape.…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The constitution is a set of rules by which a country is run. It can only have changes made to it when the majority of people say yes or else the new rule is not added this is called a referendum. The constitution affect the government and it describes their roles in running Australia. A constitution is a vital part of country because it tells how it should be run.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms can be seen as all-encompassing, and yet, it does not dictate the rules to follow regarding a major component of each person’s life: employment. Or does it? A vast portion of our lives in Canada is spent working, and regardless of the work environment, we interact with other people who may or may not come from the same backgrounds and ideologies as we do. With no specific terminology in the Charter that includes employment law, we must look between the lines and find the connections that lay within. The Charter provides the roadmap for Canadian principles and social values; it lays out the rights and freedoms we have as a people, and promotes the protection of those human rights through its laws.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A constitution is a charter or a plan of government that represents a country and in a sense, is a pact between the government and the governed. Like every other pact or agreement, it identifies all mutually agreed powers, duties and obligations and limitations and also identifying citizen participation in the government (Texas Politics). These provide fundamental law on which legal systems are established. But the government does give power to states to govern its people and still comply under the federal government as a whole. Both U.S and Texas constitutions are similar in many ways, but their difference is the key in how they govern.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the adoption in 1971, the Multiculturalism policy has been greatly debated about it’s expediency in Canadian society. Founded by settler two settler societies, Canada has been built on a foundation on cultural an ethnic diversity. Today, Canada has certainly become a nation of immigrants, but prior to the European colonization of Canada, a predominately homogenous ethnic group occupied Canada, the Aboriginals (or First Nations Peoples). Today after being dominated by Western European culture, Canada in now the home to a vast array of ethnic and culturally diverse peoples. Defining Canadian identity has proved to be a difficult task.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays