Examples Of Self Defense Of Justification

Improved Essays
Defense of justification is when there is imminent danger and police are not there to protect you. For example somebody broke into your home at night with a weapon and you do what you have to do to protect yourself.
Defense of excuse is when someone knows what they did was wrong, but they are not responsible. If the defendant had a mental disease, was just a little kid when the incident took place or acted under duress.
You can use self-defense to prevent death or serious bodily harm, if you are in fear of your life. For example- If you are in your car garage working and someone comes in and starts attacking you, you have the right to defend yourself until the suspect withdraws or decides to flee the scene.
If the
…show more content…
The plain clothes officer did not solicit Jim, he simply came up to him. The officer did not bring up the subject about baseball tickets or money. Jim is the one who engaged the officer about buying baseball tickets.
First of all the getaway driver is an accomplice to the bank robbery and did intent to commit a crime by being a getaway driver to the robbery. He is also present at the time the crime occurred. So he can be charged with robbery, same as the people that went in and robbed the bank.

White collar crimes are generally committed by upper class or wealthy people. You could think of them as business or corporate crimes. White collar crimes do not included any violence such as money laundering, embezzlement, fraud, insider trading just to name a few. Their goal is usually financial gain or to hide money from the government.

I personally could not be convicted. I as an employee was just following orders. The grocery store itself could get in a lot of trouble and be fined. The manager would also get in trouble since it is his job to manage the store and he is responsible for what goes on. I may have to go to court and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    According to Brian Payne’s, White Collar Crime, when the term white-collar offender is used, images of offenders from the economic or technological systems are often thought of (Payne, 2013). Crimes that are found in economic systems are those crimes committed by individuals such as stockbrokers or investors working in investment companies or other exchange markets that make investments, purchase materials and secure goods. Some examples include the Ponzi and pyramid schemes, insider trading or market manipulation. Crimes that are found in the technological systems are computer related actions that can sometimes be criminally illegal or harmful. These include software and internet crimes, virus introduction and unauthorized access to a variety…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As we have learned, white collar crime can be difficult to precisely define and a wide variety of definitions have been looked at in the process. While there is no consensus on one definition, there is agreement among criminologists on the following being indicative of white collar crime including the occurrence of which is in a legitimate context, motivation that is derived from economic gain or occupational success, and a lack of direct, intentional violence (Friedrichs, pg 5). Trust and respectability are also very important terms in relation to white collar crimes that we do not see with conventional crime. An important sociologist, Edwin Sutherland pointed to the violation of trust as an important element of white collar crime and characterized…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A white collar law could be a bribery of a computer company paying a store to sell more of their computers and less of the completer’s computers. An example of a common law crime could be if someone went into a bank and held up the bank until they were given a certain amount of money. 3.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stand Your Ground Law

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduction When it comes to Criminal Defenses and Criminal Punishments, perceptions of others can sometimes vary. Some may agree that the punishment goes with the crime, while others may argue that there are stipulations that can be enacted due to extenuating circumstances for the defendant of the crime. In this body of work, the key points involved in the court determining the lawfulness of the use of force, the fundamental difference between the castle doctrine and the stand your ground law, the overall role in the double jeopardy clause, the basic features of the adversarial system and lastly the authors’ opinion in the speedy trial section of the sixth amendment, if it is necessary or not and the reasons why will be…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When you add the context “Fearfull for one’s Life then you have a reason why many people that shoot someone claim self-defense. Self-defense cases are generated by controversy and stereotypes. Going back to the case of George Zimmerman who fatally shot Trayvon Martin and claimed that he was acting under the guidelines of self-defense. The courts should just believe that when someone uses deadly force that they had a legit reason for why they had to do what they had to do.…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Veyas Animal Cruelty

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I. Question Presented Is Veyas guilty of animal cruelty because she acted in self defense and can she be charged with recklessly discharging a firearm even though she was in an altered state of mind? II. Brief Answer No, Veyas is not guilty of animal cruelty because she believed her life was at risk by the horse, she also is not guilty of recklessly discharging a firearm because of her altered state of mind.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Self Defense In Maryland

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After one defends themselves from an attack, they must then prove to the court that all their actions were justifiable acts of self-defense. If a victim is unable to prove their actions were a result of self-defense they can face criminal charges. Similarly, if the victim claims self-defense the courts must decide which form, so they can be found not guilty. The forms of self-defense are self-defense, defense of others, defense of habitation, and defense of property. Each form has factors that decide whether the victim meets the requirements or…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jean Piaget’s study of the development of reasoning gives us the best insights into how we develop the self. This is best understood by assessing the insights of Cartesian dualism. ‘ Cogito ergo sum’ is Latin for ‘I think, therefore I am’. In contrast, subjective interactionists claim that the “I” is the subjective self, whereas the “me” is objective. The older I get, the better I am at reasoning with my surroundings; even if I consider my body to be part of my environment.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hugo Adam Bedau states that “most of us believe that it is not morally wrong and may even be our moral duty to use violence to prevent aggression” (738.) I firmly agree with this concept. In the case of self defense I would use violence against the individual causing harm to me. Would I go the extent of killing the person who was trying to kill me? The answer to that statement is: I do not know.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the “Stand Your Ground” Law was passed, so many deaths have happened causing people to fear that they may be next. Furthermore, the stand your ground law allows people to use unnecessary deadly force. “It provides that any person may use deadly force when he or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself of another” (Winkler). As Winkler explains, the “Stand Your Ground” Law makes people believe that if there is any reason they feel like they are threatened, use they should use deadly force.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many people who really did defend themselves with self-defense had evidence to show it. Evidence that they used included video surveillance, witnesses, and…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Americans of the United States of America we have the right for self-defense. And nobody shall tell you that you cannot have the right of personal protection.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That excuse could vary from the case sometimes, but not most the time from past situations. Self defense is defined as “the defense of one's person or interests, especially through the use of physical force, which is permitted in certain cases as an answer to a charge of violent crime”. The definition of self-defense does not match the police altercations with the victims. Cases with people dying usually impact the world with an outbreak going around. Protest occurs from state to state relating, due to a young…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    White-collar crime often is conceived as a sort of residual category in criminology, that is, as a form of crime that is unlike traditional forms of street crime. Write an essay in which you accomplish the following tasks:  Identify and discuss the distinguishing features of white-collar type crimes and white-collar offenders. How do white-collar type crimes differ from traditional street crimes in regards to their characteristics and the techniques used by the offenders who engage in them? One of the most important things I learnt from this class, is to specify the definition of the “white-collar crime” first whenever I want to talk about it.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How do you feel about a defense that is made basically to allow a criminal justification over a crime they committed? Well thats the insanity defense for you. It has been around for over two-hundred years and since then it has had several reforms brought to it. It was brought around to help the mentally ill, allowing them to plead not guilty to a crime because they lacked the mental capacity to understand right from wrong or appreciate why what they did was wrong. Basically it states they aren’t criminally responsible for their actions; therefore they are sent to mental facilities to help treat their mental illness and not given prison or jail time.…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays