Elizabeth Calderon Case Analysis

Improved Essays
Elizabeth Calderon, 39, Salinas, California, and Esther Sanchez, otherwise called Trinidad Carrillo, 54, Salinas, California, were arraigned by an elected excellent jury on charges of documenting false assessment forms, burglary of government stores, exasperated wholesale fraud, putting forth false expressions to governmentally protected establishments, and scheme,

Calderon and Sanchez are accused of scheming to present an advance application to Bank of America that contained false data and was bolstered by forged archives. As per the prosecution, starting approximately November 24, 2010, and proceeding to the present, Calderon has been an expert government form preparer and a large portion of the charges against Calderon emerge from this expense work

Calderon and Sanchez were captured in Salinas and showed up this evening in government court in San Jose before the Honorable Paul S. Grewal, U.S. Officer Judge. Both respondents' next appearance is booked for October 13, 2015 at 9:00 AM before the
…show more content…
§§ 7206(1) and 7206(2). The greatest sentence for burglary of government trusts, infringing upon 18 U.S.C. § 641, is ten years in jail and a fine of $250,000. The greatest punishment for bothered wholesale fraud, disregarding 18 U.S.C. § 1028A, is two years in jail to run back to back with the basic crime and a fine of $250,000. The most extreme sentence for putting forth false expressions to governmentally guaranteed organization, disregarding 18 U.S.C. § 1014, is thirty years in jail and a $1,000,000 fine. The most extreme punishment for connivance, infringing upon 18 U.S.C. § 371, is five years in jail and a $250,000 fine. Extra fines, punishments and regulated discharge additionally may be

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Grande vs. Jennings/McCallum 1 CA-CV 11-0148 The Court of Appeals, State of Arizona 2012 FACTS: The petitioners before the State of Court are Karen Spann Grande (daughter of Robert Spann and the representative of the Spann estate) and Kim Spann (another daughter of Robert Spann). The Respondents before the court are Sarina Jennings and Clinton McCallum, the newest owners of Robert Spann’s estate. Jennings and McCallum hired Trinidad Builders Inc. to do work on the estate. The head of this contracting company is Randy Bueghly and one of the key employees in this case is Rafael Cuen who found the money left behind by Mr. Spann.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inmate Dalerio Case

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On Friday, January 12, 2018 at approximately 1505 hours I was assisting in Department 11 of the Fresno County Superior Courthouse located 1100 Van Ness Blvd, Fresno, CA 93721. Inmate Dalerio (JID#7051330) started to talk back to Judge H. Chittick. Inmate Dalerio said to judge H. Chittick, “You are shady” and “you do not have any power.” There were another eight other inmates in the jury box and the gallery was full of spectators. The judge let inmate Dalerio say her statements and at this point she was walking out the jury box.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Unusual Suspect Cases

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Case Study: The Unusual Suspect According to the case The Unusual Suspect, Diann had committed an embezzlement fraud that she pleaded guilty to embezzling approximately $500,000 from her employer and she was sentenced for 18 months in Florida prison. Diann's fraud scheme is a form of an anti-organizational crime, and she had committed several types of the fraud schemes such as: First, she started to mistakenly pay for her vacation expense through her company’s account, Second, she called the payroll company and told the company to make changes to her salary range. Third, she made duplications of her bonus checks.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Garza v. Farias FACTS Eduardo G. Garza and Uni-Trade Fowarding, L.C., “the plaintiffs” filed a defamation suit against Dr. Hector Farias and Voices in Democratic Actions (VIDA), “the defendants”. This was in result of alleged political ties with Garza and Laredo city council members. This political tie resulted in his companies winning on a bid for the proposed lease. The defamation among Garza was the importance of this case. The defendants then filed a motion to dismiss to the Texas Citizen’s Participation Act, and the appeal followed.…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cases of Fernando and Elizabeth Key: A Note on the Status of Blacks in Seventeenth-Century Virginia discusses the two court cases of Fernando and Elizabeth Key. Warren Billings begins by stating Alden T. Vaughn’s note on the Africans who arrived in Virginia between 1619 and 1630 as those who are the origins of chattel slavery and racial prejudice. The two court cases of the blacks reveal how being a Christian in this time can affect your status as a slave and how the Christian black status soon deteriorated.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Minimum penalties are $10,000 per violation with repeat offenders getting $25,000 annually. The maximum penalty is $50,000 with again a $1.5 million maximum for repeat offenders. The final category involves willful neglect, knowingly committing the act, and not completing corrections within the allowed time frame. The minimum and maximum for this is $50,000 per violation with repeat offenders getting as much as $1.5 million per…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is my belief Parks should have been charged if he was aware of the conditions the warehouse being operated under. Whether or not he was actually working at the warehouse he has some type of responsibility in maintaining its sanitation and abiding by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which he failed to do himself as well as his "dependable subordinates" (dynamic business law, 166). Additionally, after receiving a warning he continuously ignored illegal protocols in the warehouse that he knew could potentially affect a consumer’s health so he most certainly should be held responsible. He may not have intended to cause harm directly to anyone but he is more than aware that rodent contaminated food that has been ruled toxic by the FFDCA could potentially hurt a consumer, therefore he should be convicted though a light charge should be given to him.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    La Alianza Case Summary

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of this case policy analysis is to identify the absence of actions that could have been taken by the Department of Social Services and La Alianza that contributed to the outcomes of the children reported in the case study High Stakes and Frightening Lapses. Additionally, the recommended stance of the Commissioner of DSS at the end of the case study will be to implement new contracts with nonprofit agencies while increasing communication between the agencies to prevent additional neglect of the children to occur. The deontological perspective will support the need to provide required services regardless of the situational factors due to a moral obligation. Case Policy Analysis & Recommendation In the analysis of the Department…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gundecking In The Navy

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Punishments by court martial are but not limited to: (1) "Reprimand. A court-martial shall not specify the terms or wording of a reprimand. A reprimand, if approved, shall be issued, in writing, by the convening authority " (2) "Foifeiture of pay and allowances. Unless a total forfeiture is adjudged, a sentence to forfeiture shall state the exact amount in whole dollars to be forfeited each month and the number of months the forfeitures will last."…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment You have asked me to research the Padilla claim to determine whether our client, Piotr Budziszewski, had ineffective assistance of counsel because they failed to let him know that he would face deportation if plead guilty to one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell. Legal Issue When counsel fails to notify their client of the immigration consequences that would come from pleading guilty, are they guilty of ineffective counsel thus violating the client’s rights guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment? Facts Piotr Budziszewski, a Polish man and lawful permanent resident of United States plead guilty to one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell, an aggravated felony. He was originally charged with two counts of selling narcotics by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b), and two counts of possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a).…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fernando Tejeda responded “ when I heard the price of the new phone; it was nonsense. The first phone costs more than a car or our dinner. Who would want to pay a phone that cost $4,000 I would not, I rather instead buy a car than a phone. Now this day, you can buy a phone with low price or a good…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fraud matters, and control frauds pose unique risks. It is important to understand fraud mechanisms. Economists grossly underestimate its prevalence and impact, and prosecutors have difficulties finding it, even without the political pressure from politicians who receive campaign contributions from the banking industry Control fraud can occur in waves created by poorly designed deregulation that creates a criminogenic environment. Waves of control fraud cause immense damage Control frauds convert conventional restraints on abuse into aids to fraud Conflicts of interest matter.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First off, let me just say that I take all responsibility for what I did. In fact, I’m actually quite proud of it, I mean actually who can steal $17 billion dollars in the space of less than a year, let alone half of a year. I suppose that you want to know why I did it, and to that I have no better answer than that I wanted to see if I could do it. Marvin will try to tell you that I was bullied, and exploited, but honestly I thought that it was quite fun mooching off of those rich jerks who thought I would act as a good bodyguard. As for the bullying I didn’t really care, to me the bullies are microscopic parasites,…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction The case study involves Hernandez versus Texas this was a Mexican – American civil right case which was recorded as the first one. The case was listened by States Supreme Court this was after the Second World War. Historically it was around 1950. The case was involved murder the named Pete Hernandez who was a cotton picker was accused of killing Joe Espinosa. They were no Mexican who has served on the jury for more than twenty-five years.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Bribery Illegal

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bribing public officials is not only illegal it is a crime. Throughout history, bribery and the government have gone hand and hand. Bribery is when someone accepts something of value for an act that they would not have otherwise been done. There are laws in place for the United States government and Military to deter bribery but due to the lightness of the punishments it continues to happen. Heavier punishments, however, will better deter and eventually stop bribes from this happening.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays