Elements Of The Offence Analysis

Improved Essays
R V Campbell (2010) NSWSC 995
Desmond Campbell was found guilty of pushing his wife, Janet Campbell, of six months off a cliff top in the Royal National Park. Desmond pushed Janet from the top of a sheer 50m cliff south of Burning Palms, resulting in her death as she had hit her head on a rick platform below, in March 2005.

Elements Of The Offence
Before a criminal act can be brought to trial, the police and prosecutors need to prove the elements of a particular offence are present. The elements are; actus reus, mens rea and causation. Actus reus, meaning “guilty act”, it refers to the physical act of carrying out the crime. Mens rea, meaning “guilty mind” refers to the mental state of the accused. In order for the prosecution to succeed,
…show more content…
A month before Janet died, Desmond bought an EPIRB (an Emergency Position-Indicating Radio Beacon) and it was on this radio that he called an ambulance after Janet had fallen. At the scene, Janet’s shoe print was identified on the very edge of the cliff on a slope of about 26 degrees. There was damage to a shrub immediately adjacent to the shoe imprint consistent with her attempts to save herself from falling to her death. The imprint established that Janet was upright before falling from cliff edge, which is not consistent with some falling off a cliff, it suggests she was pushed. Mr. Campbell’s behaviour in the days following Janet’s death do not indicate a grieving husband, as on the first business day after Janet’s death, he went on holiday with his girlfriend and proposed to her. On the day of Janet’s funeral, Mr. Campbell paid $79.95 to join a dating website and messaged multiple women.
Role Of The Courts
All criminal cases begin in the Local Court. Summary offences are dealt with in the Local Court; more serious offences are referred to the District or Supreme Court after a committal hearing. There is no jury as matters are tried by a magistrate.
Local Court: Campbell’s committal hearing took place at the Deniliquin Court House where the R v Campbell case was found to have sufficient evidence for a criminal trial. He was also granted
…show more content…
Solicitor for Regina was S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Public Prosecution) and M Bowe Solicitors for the offender.

The Plea
Desmond Campbell pleaded ‘Not Guilty’.

Factors That Affect The Sentencing Decision
There were Aggravating Factors:
Offence: Mr. Campbell pushed Janet off a 50m drop cliff where she fell onto rocks. Evidence proves she struggled before her death and would’ve known her fate.
Victim: She was very vulnerable in the moment as she had a fear of heights and didn’t know her surroundings. Evidence also shows that she was killed for her money.

There were no Mitigating Factors:
Mr. Campbell was not a good character, as multiple people testified that he had used derogatory and distasteful terms when describing his wife and other women. He was cheating on Janet with several women.
The defendant showed no remorse or grief about his wife’s death; he went on holiday with his girlfriend days after she died and did not attend Janet’s funeral.
Janet Campbell was a kind, generous woman who loved her husband and did not provoke him or give him any reason to murder her.

Judge Latham cited many cases during his decision of what time to sentence Mr.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On the 17th of December 1986, Olaf Dietrich arrived in Melbourne from a flight from Thailand and was charged the next day with four counts of drug trafficking. He was alleged to have swallowed 70 grams of heroin in small packets in attempt to smuggle them through customs. Olaf Dietrich was found, in his first trial, guilty by a jury of importing no less than a trafficable amount of heroin as pursuant to section 233B of the Customs Act of 1901. Dietrich at first alleged that the drugs had been planted by the police. He was found guilty of two other counts and sentenced in the Victorian County Court.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, he mentions that in the courts ruling in Commonwealth v. Root, they held that “the tort liability concept of proximate cause has no proper place in prosecutions for criminal homicide and more direct causal connection is required for conviction.” Second, he suggests that, in this ruling, the Court relied on the tort liability concept of proximate cause. Therefore, the Court went against their ruling in Commonwealth v. Root. Comments: It is my opinion that the Court’s ruling that Cheek’s is guilty, of causing a chain reaction of events that lead to Joe Howell’s death, is accurate.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Select a crime and then find a suitable case that interests you. Newspapers are a great place to start researching for a case - Mohammed Haddara faced Melbourne Magistrates’ Court in the committal hearing (a hearing in the local court before the charge is heard in the district court or Supreme Court) over drug possession and vehicle thefts . Identify the court the case would be heard in. Outline the jurisdiction of this court – criminal, civil, original and appellate – This court has been heard in the Melbourne Magistrates court as a committal hearing. The Magistrates court of Victoria is the lowest court in the Victorian system and is a court of summary jurisdiction .…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Houston, Texas, 48-year-old Mary Lou Morris, was found burnt to death in her car only three miles away from her home. Mary’s husband, Jay Morris, had not been able to reach her all day since she left for work earlier that morning. Jay soon found Mary had not made it to work after her supervisor called to see why Mary had not shown up. Mary had a successful career, lots of friends, and no known enemies, which made her death very confusing. Three days later, 39-year-old Mary McGinnis Morris was found dead in her car, not far from where Mary Lou was found.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, in this trial, the implications of an elected versus appointed judge can be seen. Judge Horton did the right thing by overturning the conviction of Haywood Patterson, he did so at great risk. Horton, an elected judge, basically ended his career with this move. It is this situation that leads me to believe that judges should be appointed rather than elected. Not every judge, especially when put in a situation like this, would have the integrity to ignore the political ramifications of their decision.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opinion Ms. Justice Martinez delivers the opinion of the court. Appellant stands convicted of murdering Mr. Thompkins and possession of an illegal firearm. The Supreme Court of New Jersey found the conviction valid based primarily upon the confession unlawfully obtained from the appellant and the evidence brought to the court which was also unlawfully collected at the victim’s home. On December 24, the Ocean County Sherriff’s department was called to a wellness check of Mr. Thompkins.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Tall Man Film Analysis

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tall Man The innocence of the police is questioned when a shocking event happened, an Aboriginal man Cameron Doomadgee was found dead in custody. The Tall Man brings to light the events of his death, writes Natasha Dos Santos. The Tall Man aims to unveil the truth of Cameron Doomadgee’s death in police custody. Director Tony Krawitz, chooses specific techniques and archival footage to justify the reason of his death. Chloe Hooper originally published The Tall Man: Death and Life on Palm Island in 2008.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Savitri Bhama

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plaintiff Savitri Bhama and defendant Rajendra Bhama were married until they got a divorce in 1977, they both are psychiatrists. While married they had two kids together. After the divorce custody of both kids was given to Savitri. Which led to a custody battle between the defendant and the plaintiff. In 1981, custody of both children was given to the defendant.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ross Durant v Spectre is binding on the Queensland Supreme Court because it was a decision reach by a superior court in the same hierarchy: Broome v Cassell & Co Ltd. It is irrelevant that the matter initiated in the New South Wales jurisdiction, as the High Court of Australia is the common apex off all judicial hierarchy, thus requiring the Queensland Supreme Court to be bound by this decision, assuming the question of law be the same: R v Rowland. If there is a majority decision, but the majority have different reasoning’s for the outcome, lower courts are still bound by the decision, however not the reasoning: Re Tyler; Ex parte Foley. In the case of Ross Durant v Spectre a joint judgment was issued, thus a majority decision will create…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, I spent my day observing juvenile detention hearings and a drug court trial in Mercer County, New Jersey. For my first observation, I went to Mercer Family Division in Mercer County, New Jersey. I observed several juvenile detention hearings. I asked one of my previous supervisors if I could sit in with her during her time in court. Overall the process for each child went relatively briefly.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Olaf Dietrich: Case Study

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Olaf Dietrich was accused of a number of drug-related offences. He was unable to afford legal representation and was made to go to trial without counsel. Dietrich had applied to the Legal Aid Commission of Victoria, who rejected his claim on the grounds that he was not willing to plead guilty to the charges. He felt this went against his rights and appealed his case to the High Court of Australia. 3 What role did the individual or group play in taking…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen of the jury. We are here today to decide if the defendant, Mrs. Minnie Wright, is found guilty of the murder of her husband. John Wright, a farmer, who was found dead in his bed by a neighbor, Mr. Hale. Mr. Hale went to see if he could get John Wright to go with him on a party telephone. Mrs. Wright looked queer as she rocked back and forth pleading her apron.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Dobinson Case Study

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The defendant himself is quoted as having said “I just left it”1 implying blatant carelessness in his conduct. This solidifies the fact that his direct actions were the cause of the fire, which would support the prosecutors approach to building the case based on this failure to act. However, the decision to apply case law and create a case on the basis of omission is questionable. Alternatively, the prosecutors could have opted for an alternative and less ambiguous route of recklessness and negligence. By doing so, they could argue based on a positive action, which was him recklessly lighting a cigarette indoors rather than his failure to act.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The impact caused the neighbor to fly 20 feet into an embankment causing her injuries and hurled Elizabeth under the defendant’s vehicle resulting in her death. The husband, Benjamin sustained injuries and ‘mental and emotional’ disturbances. Defendant filed an appeal. Procedural History: Multiple plaintiffs filed 3 different cases against defendant Graham.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mr Jones satisfies the actus reus of murder (OU, 2015c, 2.3). Mens rea follows the need for an intention. Mr Jones failing to keep records of checking the tents, nor leaving the campsite under the command of the two inexperienced employees does not foreseeably lead to death being virtually certain, consequently there was zero desire and zero intention by Mr Jones and the mens rea of murder is left unsatisfied (OU, 2015d, 2.4).…

    • 1560 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics