Both authors emphasize the childhood adversities that put individuals at risk for eating psychopathology. However, that is as far as the results can go. Such adversities can increase an individual's likelihood of developing an eating disorder, but there is no concrete evidence to prove causation. This is supported by the reality that there are some children who show resilience to their adverse environments; even though they experience adversity at a young age, not every child displays a psychopathic disorder. This is shown through Beato-Fernández’s and Johnson’s studies; of their initial sample, every single child whose social environments were assessed didn’t not develop eating psychopathic behaviours later in life. Therefore, demonstrating that adverse social and familial variables are not the only causes of eating
Both authors emphasize the childhood adversities that put individuals at risk for eating psychopathology. However, that is as far as the results can go. Such adversities can increase an individual's likelihood of developing an eating disorder, but there is no concrete evidence to prove causation. This is supported by the reality that there are some children who show resilience to their adverse environments; even though they experience adversity at a young age, not every child displays a psychopathic disorder. This is shown through Beato-Fernández’s and Johnson’s studies; of their initial sample, every single child whose social environments were assessed didn’t not develop eating psychopathic behaviours later in life. Therefore, demonstrating that adverse social and familial variables are not the only causes of eating