Considering all these analyses, it can be concluded with certainty that the information presented herein by Dr. Cheng is quite legitimate and trustworthy, due mainly to his proficient use of ethos and logos as well as his small inclusion of pathos. It is interesting to note that this document, although scholarly in nature, still completes many of the objectives of writing, which can be generalized into informing people of a certain subject, and persuading them to take a stance for it. In Dr. Cheng’s case, his balanced use of data and discussions, coupled with word choice, all while being encompassed by his own knowledge and credibility on the topic, result in a well thought and well versed scholarly journal that can be deemed exceptional for
