Doors And People Test Essay

The Doors and People Test was conducted by MacPherson, Bozzali, Cipolotti, and Shallice, and was approved by the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery and Institute of Neurology Joint Research Ethics Committee. The experiment aimed to test and compare the cognitive abilities of those who had frontal lobe lesions to those who did not. The study involved four tests; two tests measured ability of recall, and two tests measured ability of recognition. The experimental group consisted of patients from the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, and the control group consisted of men and women with medical histories devoid of head injury, stroke, major neurolgical illness, psychiatric illness, and alcohol abuse. The experimental and control groups conducted the verbal recall (people subtest), visual recall (shapes subtest), verbal recognition (names subtest), and visual recognition (doors subtest) subtests of The Doors and People Test to determine whether or not any significant differences between the two existed. When the scores of the two groups were compiled and fixed to accommodate age, the …show more content…
The Doors and People Test supports the idea that cognitive impairment is faced by frontal lesion patients, and will help caretakers to better understand the difficulties faced by frontal lesion patients. This difference suggests that there are different mental processes for visual and verbal recall. This helps to better illustrate the differences between visual and verbal recall, and how it is affected by certain types of cognitive disabilities. The study also showed that recall is more affected than recognition in frontal lobe lesion patients. Recall being affected more than recognition is not a surprising discovery because recognition is simply recall aided by clues, usually making recognition easier than