Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Does The Internet Make You Dumb'

Improved Essays
Logos, or the means of persuasion by use of reasoning, is a very effective rhetorical strategy that appeals to the reader’s logic. Not only is logos Aristotle’s favorite form of rhetoric but, it is the most widely used rhetorical form. Logos is composed of both inductive and deductive reasoning and in “Does the internet make you dumb” Nicholas car uses both to prove his thesis that the internet is turning us into “superficial and scatterbrained thinkers
(Carr 218). He believes the internet is a huge distraction and is being overused. In “Does the internet make you dumb” Nicholas car uses Inductive reasoning. According to Evan Heit and Caren Rotello, “Research on inductive reasoning has examined the effects of varying the number of premises
…show more content…
Deductive reasoning, according to Handley in his article “Fluency And Belief Bias In Deductive Reasoning: New Indices For Old Effects”, is when the writer of the essay provides a “logical argument”(Handley) for the readers. The first premise Carr uses is that we can only learn something when we are one hundred percent focused. Carr writes “Only when we pay deep attention to a new piece of information are we able to associate it meaningfully and systematically ‘with knowledge already established in memory”(Carr 217). Carr uses deductive reasoning leading the reader think about his conclusion that the internet is making us dumber. This is because if people are constantly being distracted they can never truly learn material because they are not dedicating all of their brain space to it. The second Premise that Carr uses is the fact that our brain can rewire itself overtime according to incoming stimuli. Carr cites an experiment where a primate’s neural circuits are changed in response to experience. This premise is deductive reasoning because it leads the reader to come to the conclusion that the brain would rewire itself after long hours using the internet systematically making large portions of the world who use the internet more scattered brained. Lastly, Carr used the premise of the innate bias of the human brain to help lead to his main argument. Carr suggests that the innate

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introduction: Jay Heinrichs in the introduction to Thank You for Arguing “Open Your Eyes”, emphasizes how inescapable rhetoric is in everyday life as he proves the importance of rhetoric in daily livelihood. He supports his argument by observing that “We live in a dark world of persuasions.” (9). To further prove his point Heinrichs journals a his attempt of a day without persuasion of which he records that he could not even make it out of bed without being persuade to by his alarm clock. Hendricks further points out the effects of seduction in making a decision.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Section One, Intro/Offense: Jay Heinrichs points out how rhetoric is an incredibly useful skill that dates all the way back to being started by the ancient Greeks and perfected by the Romans. As time progressed in about the 19th century rhetoric increasingly became less popular and has not been a large part of education. Heinrichs would like to show to people just how important rhetoric truly is. Rhetorical arguments are all around us, as the author notices the company that makes his wrist watch uses a form of marketing called “argument from strength”, simply meaning if something works in the rough it will work in the smooth. Heinrichs leads into a vey important part of a rhetorical argument, persuasion.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yemisrach Reta ENG 121-340 Professor Ashley Waterman 2 May 2017 Rhetorical Analysis of the Essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid” In “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr uses some evidences in his argument in order to convince the idea of the other people . I believe Carr’s argument is effective because he starts explaining how he feels when he is reading a book and immersing himself in a book.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Jay Heinrichs, an established content and editorial consultant for companies such as Southwest Airlines and NASA, has developed into a persuasion master. Studying the works of the ancient Greeks and Romans, including Aristotle and Cicero, Heinrichs has produced a rhetoric guide used by high schools and universities around the world. Thank You For Arguing, a New York Times Best Seller, is one of the top ten books assigned at Harvard. Heinrichs does a superb job of showing his readers the art of persuasion.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ted Talks’ speaker and journalist Stephanie Busria is able to capture the audience’s attention in “How Fake News Does Real Harm” by delivering a true cautionary tale on the effects of fake news has society. The speaker’s strategic rhetoric allows the audience to be taken up enough to listen to her story. This then leads to believing the story and acting on it. Busria’s rhetoric follows the same script. She uses certain phrases in her statement to established credibility with the audience, which is ethos.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Case For Rhetoric Debate and argument are a pinnacle foundation of speech in the world. Jay Heinrichs Thank You For Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us About the Art of Persuasion, is like the bible of rhetoric and argument. Heinrichs is a former editor of many different publishers including: Rodale Inc., and Dartmouth Alumni Magazine. His book, is the leading book in the introduction to rhetoric, and is used in thousands of classrooms every year.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Not only is it not sufficient on its own, but it is no more important than either of the two other pillars. He argued that all three persuasive appeals are necessary. Is he right? What do you think?…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the last few months, I have read and annotated Thank You For Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson can teach us about the Art of Persuasion by Jay Heinrichs. After being a journalist and publishing executive for 25 years, Heinrichs is now the professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Middlebury College in Vermont and travels the world as a presenter and persuasion expert. Published in 12 languages and 3 editions, Thank You For Arguing is a New York Times bestseller, along with being one of the top ten books assigned at Harvard. My analysis of Thank You For Arguing made me uncover the lost art of rhetoric, the steps in creating an excellent persuasive speech, and identifying the three methods of persuasion in everyday arguments.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the first few weeks of ENG 1301, we’ve learned the significance of learning rhetorical skills while writing; specifically, the rhetorical triangle - also known as ethos, pathos, and logos appeals. Whether you need to beg your parents for more gas money, or you want to receive a raise from that revolting fast food chain you’re forced to work at to pay college tuition, these appeals are the foundation of persuasion and can move an audience in any which way the author pleases to do so. In order to be accepted into a community, one must deeply understand the overall purpose and interests of the group. Once this happens, you’ll be able to intuitively understand the discourse community’s way of communicating and interacting with one another.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Thank You for Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us about the Art of Persuasion” made me realize how imperative arguing is to our everyday life. The book has been utilized in schools across the U.S for many years due to many readers, including myself finding Jay Heinrich’s cleverness and passion for rhetoric as an intriguing portal to the world of literature. Heinrichs has even been named “Professor of the Practice of Rhetoric and Oratory” at Middlebury College, and his book is also said to be one of the top ten books assigned at Harvard University. Throughout “Thank You for Arguing” Heinrichs effectively describes and demonstrates the different ways in which argument by character, logic, and emotion can act as powerful tools of persuasion, it is very well shown in chapter 4 and made me recognize how vital rhetoric is for us and our future generations.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The essay, “Does the Internet Make You Dumber?” written by Nicholas Carr, addresses the negative impact that the internet has on us. He uses experiments from highly recognized universities and people to support his view. He emphasizes that the use of technology and multitasking distracts us which leads to lack of focus, “turning us into scatter superficial thinkers.” Carr conveys that while we may think we are good multitaskers, we need to focus to meaningfully understand and retain knowledge. He expresses how negative the loss of mental discipline and strength can affect our lives with the use of a hyperbole.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Inductive detection like anything has pros and cons and is used by many people all the time. Whether we enjoy using inductive or deductive reasoning, the process of inductive thinking is one of the most used ways we form ideas about things. I believe for a detective to be successful, he must become a master at inductive detection.. Sherlock holmes is the best example of how a detective can use deductive or inductive detection to their benefit. Sherlock holmes is a special kind of detective, he uses both deductive and…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Carr (2010), reasoning has been fundamentally altered by the Internet into superficial thought processes through skimming, diversions, and facile learning. The research confirms that the ‘mental calisthenics’ involved in surfing the Internet, consequently puts even more of a strain on the brain, which then results in the lack of comprehension (Carr 2010, p. 3). For example, navigating Wikipedia, where there are numerous links to other sub-topics, have been found to considerably increase distractibility and oversimplified thinking because of the countless information the brain is inundated with, such as advertisements, formats, and others. In essence, screen technology through the loss of focus and depth of thought has radically changed cognition, which is pernicious to an intellectual…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the century innovation has changed humans critical thinking. From the manual type writer to the computer the utilization of the technology, is part of our everyday activity. In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” by Nicholas Carr, Carr tried to express his concern, how the internet changing our lives and the thinking ability and the way our brain processes the information differently than it used to in the past. Carr explain how we don’t think and depend on quick searches, rather than taking our time to do critical thinking and researches. He tells us how our brain is malleable, and it is changing every day.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although depending on the internet may not seem to be as bad as it is thought to be, it takes away from the notion of thinking for ourselves. “We no longer take responsibility for our own beliefs, and we lack the capacity to see how bits of facts fit into a larger whole.” (7, Lepore) By referring back to the internet to justify our facts and get answers, we fail to understand how these answers are related to one another and how this knowledge fits together. However, Lynch believes it’s not the internet to blame but the paradox that “reason can’t defend itself without reason”.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays