Ever wondered if each one of us accept others as human beings? There's plenty of possibilities that people may or may not accept us. In the articles "Texas vs Johnson" by William J. Brennan, "American Flag Stands for Tolerance" by Ronald J. Allen, and the trailer " My so called enemy" all of them explain how we accept each other and our opinions. These articles and trailers will explain how we as human beings must be willing to accept people and give opinions that are different from ourselves .…
The book A Conflict of Visions: Origins of Political Struggles by Thomas Sowell centers around the idea of understanding the roots of differing political visions which he refers to as "our sense of how the world works." (Sowell) Consequently, there is no means of reconciliation and/or compromise between these two contradicting political concepts he presents as the constrained and unconstrained visions. On the other hand, Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think by George Lakoff presents an argument towards the contradiction between Liberals' and Conservatives' worldviews through cognitive linguistics or "The subfield most concerned with issues of worldview, that is, with everyday conceptualization, reasoning, and language." (Lakoff)…
Stefan Babich in his article, “The Fall of The Female Protagonist in Kids’ Movies” writes about the idea of a female protagonist dying in the “animation war” (n. pag.). He writes about how in recent days animation movies do not have a female protagonist who isn’t the cookie cutter princess. This is very similar to the view in Amanda Marcotte’s article titled, “The Shocking Radicalism of ‘Brave’” where she talks about how “Brave” is a movie that seemed to try to fall out of the algorithm but eventually is from the same mold of movies that the Disney movies come from (Marcotte n. pag.). Although both Babich and Marcotte have similar views on the topic, Marcotte’s article seems to focus on women 's role in society (which does account for a…
Professor Alan Taylor’s topic in the first page of the essay is how the founding fathers, like many Americans at the time, clashed on many issues. He uses combative diction to not only suggest, but to force readers to understand that the parties clashed. He denounced the “mythic” misconception of the unity of the founding fathers to “violent” “enemies” in order to show his readers how cutthroat politics were back then. The way he would quote people would only include their party affiliation, which further deepens the gorge that divides the parties at the time.…
In the United States, our government is made up of people with different political ideologies and assertions. Our association with certain political parties is an example of our differences. Republicans and Democrats throughout history have represented the interests of their supporters rightfully. Conservatives have contrasting views upon the economy, social issues, and international policy. Liberals uphold democracy to its highest standards and support an equal political community.…
The supremacy of federal power must be maintained by a popular majority, and the individual must participate in that popular majority is the central theme Webster’s response to Calhoun’s suppositions that freedoms are in danger from a strong federal authority. Webster asserts that the authority of the federal government is derived from the power the people have placed in it from the constitution, and in turn to each other. Webster further explains that Calhoun’s argument cannot stand based upon his false premises from which the authority of a government is derived. Webster’s argument is that an individual serves his fellow countryman by granting power to the government to serve interests of the people as whole without prejudice or favoritism over the individual.…
In the United States, people are given many liberties, rights, and freedoms. Since the country’s founding, it’s been a democratic government; valuing the voices and rights of its citizens. However, during times of national crisis, United States presidents have made controversial decisions affecting civil liberties. Many of these decisions, such as Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s order to relocate Japanese Americans, and George W. Bush’s signing of the USA Patriot, are still heavily debated over today. Different historians and ordinary citizens argue for or against the aforementioned orders.…
The language of the United States changed drastically once the Vietnam War began. At the start of the Cold War, the United States' society was caught in an age of consensus. During this time period, the people of the United States conformed to a certain normality which was widespread because of the Cold War. However, once the generation born in the age of consensus came of age, the age of dissent began. Through expanded education and literary works from the Left, the youth began to rebel against conformity.…
Throughout the course of American history, the United States has been transformed from the once idealist union into a society at the brink of division. As a result of opposing ideals and American necessities, current society has continuously crafted the notion of social discord amongst all of parties. From opposing teams in the realm of sports to the ever-growing conflict found in the world of politics, the nation is falling further apart. However, at what cost? Due to the GOP's long-standing need to produce the perception of the common-man, anti-intellectualism has risen amongst the red party and in turn created an estrangement in current political culture.…
Rhetorical Analysis I will be analyzing, "The Supreme Court Says Again: Juveniles Are Different”, a 7 paragraph article written by the Editorial Board and published to the New York Times on January 25, 2016. In discussions of The Supreme Court’s repeated ruling over the last decade, it has become a controversial issue that it is morally and constitutionally wrong to equate offenses committed by emotionally undeveloped adolescents with crimes carried out by adults. While some argue that no matter what age, if a person where to do something so cruel, for example, kill someone, they should be entitled to life in prison.…
According to the passage written by Lincoln Steffens, he and other muckrakers pointed out that there was a serious flaw in voting for the government. This political attack on the government speaks of the city of Philadelphia, and how flawed the “political machines” were. This was not just going on in Philadelphia, but every across the nation. When it comes to voting in America, it was flawed then, and is still flawed now. With this information, the question arose: Is America truly a democracy?…
Riot is a term used to define and encompass various types of behaviors that are viewed as disorderly, including violence, destruction of property and clashes with those who enforce law and order. (Andrews, 2014, p. 288). Ideologies such as “conservatism” and “radicalism” hold opposing views as to how they perceive “riots” and their effect on society,. We can look at riots from particular perspectives by examining social order and disorder through “riots” and their relationship to the political ideologies of “conservatism” and “radicalism”. These two ideologies have decidedly different viewpoints of the causes and meanings of riots and the effect they have in promoting change, or as a result , the “strengthening” of social order.…
Americans shared a set of three core beliefs in the 1950s known as the Liberal Consensus. Firstly, all social problems can be solved through economic growth under capitalism because everyone will benefit. Secondly, it is the duty of the United States as a democratic society to stop the spread of communism. Finally, pluralism prevents authoritarian government takeover. Several circumstances reinforced these attitudes: The Baby Boom of the 1940s and a subsequent increase in GNP; the spread of McCarthyism; the peaceful protests of the early Civil Rights movement; and the early Kennedy presidency.…
Thomas Frank in the essay, Commodify Your Dissent, argues that American culture has become dependent on rebellion. Frank supports his argument by illustrating the social norms in America during the 1950s with the suburban correctness. For example, he discusses how society respected authority, a mass majority of people attended church, and sexual repression (Frank 152). Then Frank dives into the social rebellion following countercultural ideas. Thomas quotes Jerry Rubin stating “Amerika says: Don’t!…
Gordon S. Wood is an eminent historian who got his masters and Ph.D. degrees from Harvard University in 1959 and 1964 respectively. He is a professor of History Emeritus at Brown University and also an Alva O. Way University Professor (Brown Affiliations). Wood has worked wholeheartedly towards combining the everchanging social and political ideas and how they are currently being projected from the early American Republic. The theme of his writing is mostly guided by the idea that the revolution was the most radical incident in the American History (Dallek, Matthew). The writing of Wood reflects his beliefs that the revolution played a tremendous part in defining the future of American politics based on egalitarian principals.…