Realism Vs Liberalism

Improved Essays
Liberalism is the theoretical idea that plurality of actors in the are very important in the international arena. Actors such as private, non-governmental, businesses, and individual leaders shape a state’s foreign policy and have become an important role in the global economy. Liberal’s concentrate on economic freedom like free markets and capitalism as well as democracy as a political system. These freedoms are seen as cooperation and interdependence amongst the international arena. Their personal characteristics is influenced by their decision making and for the individual to create a just society based on reason. “Liberalism argues that all levels of analysis matter in order to understand what is happening in international politics” …show more content…
Liberalism also reinforces political and economic freedom for a peaceful world order. This is a very different contrast from realism who relies on conflict and security domain that is argued. There are many differences between these two theories of thought. Unlike neorealism which perceives the state as the primary actor, liberalism sees individual acts as crucial to the international arena. Liberalism does agree with realism about the sole importance of a sovereign state. “The structure of democratic government limits and constrains the types of conflicts over which democratic leaders can mobilize society” (Haupt 2016, T2L2, 10). Ikenberry describes that there are various strands of liberalism. One strand is that “free trade and economic openness both create and reinforce democracy, because open markets support more open and less autocratic regimes” (America’s Grand Liberal Strategy p. 48). Liberalism’s logic believes free trade will give rise to a state’s well-being, which will create more peace amongst the state. Ikenberry asserts that “The liberal international order has succeeded over the decades because its rules and institutions have not just enshrined open trade and free markets but also provided tools for governments to …show more content…
It is essential to cooperate to provide negotiations among other nations, create rules for trade and international law. It is essential for self interested states to cooperate for the best of its state. Along with Neorealism, Neoliberalism acknowledges the existence of international anarchy, but recognizes that cooperation and working with one another is beneficial to both parties. Like the United Nations, intergovernmental institutions work to gather nations to voice their opinions and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism is a political philosophy or way of thinking based on the ideas of liberty and equality for all in society. With this theory or political policy in place, it is ideal for the people of the society to have the majority of the power in regards to decision making in the community. Meaning that the people have the power to vote for the people in government, freedom of press, freedom to practice any religion, and keep any civil or natural right reserved no matter what transpires in the government. Liberalism also has a strong support in a person being an individual first before being a component in a society.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism is the International Relations (IR) theory best reflected in the 2015 NSS. One key tenant of the Obama Administration’s foreign policy formulation is global economic prosperity and independence. American economic prosperity and interdependence with other state actors are critical drivers of global leadership, reflecting fundamental United States (U.S.) interests and values, and accentuates economic exchange with allies.1 (Walt, p.2) The stratagem recognizes a critical need for global competitiveness, sustained economic development, creating good jobs and raising incomes to influence American prosperity.2 (NSS, p. 15) In that, the plan accentuates the U.S. leadership role in oil and gas production, calls for the generation of high…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Liberalism, is the want for your own self right and have the freedom to make your own choice by no persuasion of others. Liberalism was brought into light by John Locke who believed that individuals should have the right to choose what they wanted to do as long as they did not hurt anyone else. With this they should not be forced by others including the government or “The Crown”. Liberalism rose during the Industrial Revolution. Locke believed that by nature, men, were all free, equal, and independent (Locke, pg. 52).…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism is a legal theory that emphasizes individual rights and freedoms over utilitarianism. John Locke is known as one of the key figures in liberalism, and he describes a social contract that would ensure individual rights and an equal relationship between citizens and the government. There are four main themes that are outlines by Brian Tamanaha. Firstly; “the individual is free to the extent that the laws are created democratically. Citizens have thereby consented to, indeed authored, the rules they are obligated to follow.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The political beliefs of the American people in the year 2016 can be characterized as reform liberalism. Although the American political culture contains numerous core ideals and values as all American share different views, the vast majority of people support general ideas including equality, liberty, and order. America allows each individual to have their own personal beliefs within the political sphere. Different generations live through different experiences which significantly shapes the thinking of individuals. Political beliefs and ideologies form due to the resolutions regarding different conflicts.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1914, Europe erupted into a conflict now referred to as World War I, which led to the deaths of over 38 million soldiers and civilians and becoming the ninth most deadliest conflict thus far in human history. With such death and destruction seen through this 4 year international conflict, a variety of international relation theories have arose trying to determine the causation of the war; of the theories that have arose, Neorealism and Neoliberalism seem the best at explaining the conflict. Of these two theories, I believe that Neorealism best explains the war aspirations of both the Allied and Central Powers. Beginning on the theory of Neoliberalism; it begins with a theory in which states are self interested players willing to cooperate…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Snyder generalizes liberalism and therefore contradicts Doyle’s breakdown of the theory. While Doyle’s list allows room for explanation of the periodic necessity of war, Snyder’s description assumes that liberal states fail to realize that necessity and the reasoning behind war. Snyder also states that liberalism cannot accurately explain why the U.S. has failed to work with some other democracies, especially through international organizations (Snyder 2004, 59). However, while Doyle seems to acknowledge that liberal states distrust non-liberal states, he also seems to suggest that, in the case of liberal imperialism, people still seek to dominate others out of fear. This could provide a partial explanation for the lack of cooperation between the U.S. and other…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Liberal War

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tenet that I would like to discuss in this Conceptual Response is ‘Liberal Wars have a distinct relationship to territory insomuch as spatiality is firmly bound to active living space’ (Evans, 2011, p.750-751). Liberalism, understanding by most people, is the ideology based on the ideas of equality and freedom. However, in ‘The Liberal War Thesis’, the author Brad Evans illustrates that liberalism is not simply a set of principles, but ‘a regime of power that wages the destiny of the species on the success of its own political strategies’ (Evans, 2011, p.748). Although liberalism has always been associated with the idea of peace and security, it does not equal to pacifism since it was usually realized through violence and wars. Moreover, as we discussed in class, the liberal way of war is to ‘make war on life for the purpose of making life live’, which means that the liberals are using war as a tool to end…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Charter Of Rights Analysis

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. Liberalism is a legal theory uses utilitarianism to accentuate individual rights and freedoms. Brian Tamanha analyzes four main themes; “the individual is free to the extent that the laws are created democratically, “the…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Applying the theory of liberalism in the process of seizing power. Which the Liberalism theory is a concept that prioritizes the interests of the individual which is the main subject of this understanding. Liberalism bring the concept of freedom to live, think, act and work. In liberalism, the State must still ensure the freedom of the individual, and for the human jointly rule the country. Liberalism believes that it is not with violence, anarchism and coercion to obtain self-interest.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism And The Cold War

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To clarify, liberalism is, as explained by Moravcsik, “foreign policy preferences of governments… directly influenced by the formal representative institutions that link state and society” ("Liberalism", (n.d.)) which includes “political parties, electoral systems, and bureaucracies.” ("Liberalism", (n.d.)). Because of the nature of communism, which has no political parties or electoral systems, the war for democracy was also a war for…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism emphasizes freedom, liberty, and individuality particularly in democracies where property ownership, civil rights, religion, and individual liberty came into play. Liberalist favored the idea of democracies as opposed to societies with aristocracies and a monarchy that limited liberty and freedom. Liberalism, according to Mill allows “each person [to] becomes more valuable to himself, and is therefore capable of being more valuable to others.” This philosophy focuses on the individual, and how the individual implicates their own role in society, this is evident when Mill claims, “works partake the character of those who do them, by the same process human life also becomes rich, diversified, and animating…making the race infinitely better worth belonging to.”…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism are all three important theories in the world of International Relations and while there are many differences between the three perspectives, there is still one main similarity. Realism and Liberalism are well-known theories, while Constructivism happens to fall into the category of alternative views. Anarchy is a condition of International Relations that requires states to rely on their own power(Shiraev and Zubok.41). Each theory provides strong arguments as to how much cooperation is possible under anarchy, but in my honest opinion, I believe that Liberalism is the theory that provides the strongest argument as to how cooperation is possible under anarchy.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    States want to join different institutions because it is in their owns states best interests and states people are required to look for their nations national security. States people feel obligated to do what’s best for their nations interests and that they are fully responsible for their own countries. Political obligations which regard the state- whether it is formed by social contract, by historical evolution, by conquest or by any other method- as self-contained political community that is morally prior to any international associations it may subsequently join (Jackson and Sorenson, 147). International organizations offer power and security to nations, which is one of the main components to every realist. Meanwhile, liberals join to uphold and defend justice.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oxford Dictionary online (2016) defines international relations as “the way in which two or more nations interact with and regard each other, especially in the context of political, economic, or cultural relationships”. However, what to include and exclude in the definition is a controversial topic and there is still no decisive answer of what international relations means. Scholars have been suggesting various definitions, for instance, one source stated that International Relations (i.e. the study of international relations, referred to as IR) is defined as “the study of interactions among the various actors that participate in international politics including states, international organizations…and individuals” (Mingst et al. 2014: 2)…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays