The North's Role In The Cause Of The Civil War

Improved Essays
Economic differences between the North and the South played a pivotal role in the cause of the Civil War. The North was industrialized, and their work depended on machines and manufacturers. They had long winters, and short summers, making it hard for them to use agriculture as their main source of economy. The North had five times the number of factories than the South, and over ten times the number of factory workers. In addition, 90% of the nation's skilled workers were in the North. (Marc Schulman) With the increase of employment in the North it was obvious that the population started to grow. With more people came a demand for representation in proportion to the size of its population. In the South, however, one-third of the population …show more content…
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was one of the most crucial events leading up to the Civil War. In 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act created territories for both Kansas and Nebraska. This gave a chance for people to move slavery to the Midwest. Also, it allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska the choice whether they wanted to be a free state, or a slave state. The only problem with this was that there was already a compromise to the location of slavery. This was called the Missouri Compromise, it said that there was no slavery North of latitude 36°30’. The point of this compromise was to make sure that the balance in congress was fair between the free and slave states. When the Kansas-Nebraska act was passed through congress on May 30, 1854, the North was stunned. (history-world.org) Stephen A. Douglas, the man who brought the Kansas-Nebraska act to congress was a strong believer in popular sovereignty. Since he felt so strongly about it, he said that popular sovereignty would decide whether or not Kansas and Nebraska would be a free state or slave state. This decision caused a huge disagreement between the North and South because this would allow slavery north of the Mason-Dixon dividing line created in the Missouri Compromise. The fight over slavery was then transferred to the territories of Kansas and Nebraska. Proslavery supporters from the South, and antislavery supporters from the North, rushed into Kansas to try and win the territory as their own. War broke out in the territory of Kansas, as two different legislatures came to life. Eventually the death toll rose, and this is how the fight got the nickname of “Bleeding Kansas”. This fight was known as the war before the civil war, and was an important event that helped to cause the fight of the Civil

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Representative James Tallmadge even tried to propose an amendment which would essentially end slavery, during the time the Missouri request but the effort was defeated. The debate whether Missouri should be a slave or free state occurred for over a year. Northerners argued that Congress than had the power to prohibit slavery while the Southerners said they should have the freedom to choose whether the state should be slave or not. Though after a lot of debate they were soon able to come up with a compromise. The first part of the compromise was Missouri was admitted as a slave state while Maine was a free state.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into two separate parts, free or slave states. Popular sovereignty allowed the states to choose whether or not they would be free. As read in the text, “What then we do insist on, is, not to extend slavery, but that we shall not be prohibited from immigrating with our property, into the Territories of the United States” (Document 8). The South wanted to bring slavery with them and believed they had the right to do so. Although, in the North it was decided that slavery would be abolished and they would all be free states.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an era where slavery was viewed as a profitable and reputable source of wealth, income, power, and an economic driving force, divisions amongst opinions added fuel to the flame for an unavoidable conflict to ignite. The Missouri Compromise came about for views, even within a time with which like-mindedness was prized and raised to the highest of glories on a pedestal, vastly varied on the issue of slavery and its seemingly rather loosely tied boundaries. With two opposing sides, the North for the removal of slavery and the South in favor of its continued existence -- territorial issues were heavy on the mind. Though often revered as being a more verbal form of compromise that laid out specific boundaries within the states, or two states…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, in 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act was signed, Stephen Douglas offered popular sovereignty, making people decide whether to have their territory slave free or not. This act terminated the Missouri Compromise. In addition, to this in…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The North played a really big part in the reconstruction and its downfall. The North became less involved with the South and started focusing on their own political affairs. Document C In the Americans written by Gerald Danzer, he states of the Northern disconnected with the South. He writes, “In the 1870’s northern voters grew indifferent to events in the South.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bleeding Kansas was a series of violent political acts brought on by the anti-slavery citizens and Border Ruffians (pro-slavery activists from Missouri, who crossed the state border into Kansas Territory to force the acceptance of slavery) during the popular sovereignty voting day. Bleeding Kansas consisted of many openly violent acts that threatened to tear the nation apart, including the Charles Sumner-Preston Brooks event. This event highlighted the intensity of the growing split between the North and South views on slavery and was yet another event that seemed to push the divided country even further away. This event consisted of Brooks beating Sumner to death with a cane after Sumner spoke openly about “black power” and the abolition of slavery. Another openly violent attack that attracted much attention was that of John Brown.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act has been called the most significant law ever enacted by the Congress of the United States. It was called the most significant law ever enacted because it allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The law had three major features, which were a larger territory of Nebraska was dissected into two smaller territories, Kanas and Nebraska, the dissolution of the Missouri compromise, and the new territories would determine its slavery status based on popular sovereignty. When the new law went into effect pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed to Kansas, each side hoping to determine the results of the first election. Instead…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the 1850s, slavery, and other political issues between the states, became a sizable issue. Slavery began to dissect people. For example, the Northerners began to begin support free soil and abolition. However, the Southerners disagreed, and tension increased dramatically. Soon, the Southern slaveowners felt that their rights were no longer being illustrated, and felt that they must succeed (secession is the act of withdrawing from an organization, union, military alliance or especially a political entity, to be protected from Northern abuse.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not long afterwards, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 took place. This repealed the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska were both to vote using popular sovereignty to decide on slavery. Both pro-slavery settlers and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the area to gain the upper hand of the states, resulting in absolute chaos. As a result states’ rights and Manifest Destiny played a role in the cause of the Civil War.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Early in the eighteen hundreds, the Missouri Compromise was written to declare which states were to be known as slave states and free states. A line was drawn across the United States at latitude 36°30′ stating that each state to the north of the line and east of the Mississippi River is a free state and each state south of the line and east of the…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passed by Congress in may of 1854, the Kansas Nebraska Act may be the most significant of the Pre-Civil War compromises. It admitted the Kansas and Nebraska as states, but rather than decide whether the territories would become slave or non-slave states based on their location in relation to the 36’ 30° line, they were allowed to choose for themselves. Kansas and Nebraska were not the only ones allowed to decide though, each territory was allowed to choose for itself if it would be a slave or non-slave state. This allowing of territories to choose slave or non-slave is called popular sovereignty. In popular sovereignty the people of the territory vote to decide if they will become a slave state or a non-slave state.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kansas-Nebraska

    • 1339 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While there were many thing going on in the 1840s and 50s that contributed to the North South division, four major events will be identified. The Kansas-Nebraska Act, Bleeding Kansas, the Dred Scott trial and the Panic of 1857 all played a major role in the North South division and unrest leading to the Presidential election of 1860. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 “may have been the most important single event pushing the nation toward civil war” (McPherson 121). Author James McPherson stated that Kansas-Nebraska gave birth to the entirely northern Republican Party (121).…

    • 1339 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The people of the United States believed it was their god given right to expand from the Atlantic Ocean, east to the Pacific Ocean, North to Canadian border, and South to Mexico. This idea of Manifest Destiny fueled the expansion into the West. Big indicators of Manifest Destiny were the use of the Oregon Trail, and the Mexican – American War. Despite Manifest Destiny bringing about an increase in sectionalism and conflict, it also allowed for the expansion of territory and fueled movement into the west. With people moving west into the newly claimed territory, there was controversy whether the territories would become free or slave states.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many different factors that led to the North winning the Civil War. One of those factors is that the North had a larger population and more resources compared to the South. Thus the North had more manpower regardless of those soldiers that died. On the other hand, the South only had a population of 9 million compared to the North’s population of 19 million. The North also had an economic advantage because it has an industrial economy whereas the south has an agricultural economy.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays